Big Carl
Registered User
- Nov 24, 2021
- 154
- 270
We could kill two birds with one stone; hire Mike Keenan as our GM and HC.
We could kill two birds with one stone; hire Mike Keenan as our GM and HC.
Bear in mind that there are far more knowledgeable hockey fans here than myself (I don't post here often for that reason), but here's a theory:
Based on the notion of "fake left, go right", is there a slight possibility that Wheeler and Scheifele, while publicly praising Paul Maurice in the past, have been (though, if true, they'll never admit it) deliberately dogging it for the last 2 or 3 seasons to help get him canned, and now, subsequently, get Dave Lowry (and Huddy, etc) the ol' pink slip, for being a continuation of PoMo's failed coaching strategies? I find it difficult to believe they're really that blind to the fact that Maurice/Lowry/etc. (and the systems they employed) were/are ill-suited to move this team forward. I mean, Scheifele and Wheeler seem to be the two biggest underachievers on the team, i.e. we all know they've proved in the past that they are capable of contributing much more, and have been underperforming for some time now (or have they?) Again, an admittedly far-fetched theory (again, what the H do i know?) but hey, stranger things have happened. (yeah, yeah, I know, it's a conspiracy theory! My username is no accident!) Thoughts?
Well... In support of your theory, in Scheifele and Wheeler, we have two shooters...
It's an interesting idea, but I doubt it.. Wheeler loved the guy. Scheifele, maybe not so much, especially after that benching, but they must know that no other coach will gift them the keys to the car and the credit card to pay for it like Maurice did -- unless it's on the explicit instructions of management, I guess.
I expect that someday we will hear Wheeler talk a bit more about the trauma of the Maurice resignation, but I doubt they or anyone was plotting from within. His systems and man-management has begun to fail him, the team was losing hard and clearly was disgruntled and apathetic, and eventually so was he. I'm not sure that a coach who had the rope he did and who was making that much coin gets to jump ship when the going gets really tough without a succession plan in place, but I don't cut his cheques.
Well he has collected an NHL paycheck for 42 years.....Still waiting for the Jets to announce Huddy as the new head coach this summer.
I can get behind this.I'm on the Claude Julien bandwagon, proven winner, a Torts-lite if you will. Not a great shelf life but can get things headed in the right direction and takes no crap from the players.
This outlines everything wrong with Maurice's approach - or maybe right in terms of job security - he was buddies with Wheeler - as a result, intentionally or not, there are different standards held for different players.Well... In support of your theory, in Scheifele and Wheeler, we have two shooters...
It's an interesting idea, but I doubt it.. Wheeler loved the guy. Scheifele, maybe not so much, especially after that benching, but they must know that no other coach will gift them the keys to the car and the credit card to pay for it like Maurice did -- unless it's on the explicit instructions of management, I guess.
I expect that someday we will hear Wheeler talk a bit more about the trauma of the Maurice resignation, but I doubt they or anyone was plotting from within. His systems, tactics and evenman-management has begun to fail him, the team was losing hard and clearly was disgruntled and apathetic, and eventually so was he. I'm not sure that a coach who had the rope he did and who was making that much coin gets to jump ship when the going gets really tough without a succession plan in place, but I don't cut his cheques.
I'd like Barry Trotz or Bruce Boudreau for the experience. John Stevens as the hard ass coach. Or maybe Ted Nolan (he has won the Jack Adam's award before).
Yeah no, I would like to see us 'win' games in the post-season.Elliott Friedman said something interesting in the latest 32 thoughts podcast.
Apparently it's not 100 percent certain Boudreau will be back with the Canucks next year. Something about a clause in his contract leaving the possibility of an exit at season's end. Friedman was very surprised in hearing this possibility.
If he does leave, Jets should be all over this.
This may seem oversimplistic , but I think all we need is a coach that will substantially improve the Jets in limiting high danger scoring opportunities against. There's no guarentee a inexperienced coach can do this. We need a coach with a track record in this area.Yeah no, I would like to see us 'win' games in the post-season.
Boudreau imo is a better coach for a team in the latter-half of a rebuild. Able to get a team back to being contenders.
Jets can't hire Boudreau - you've seen the pictures of him behind the Wild bench - with the high blood pressure tomato head. Trying to coach the Jets could literally kill him!Elliott Friedman said something interesting in the latest 32 thoughts podcast.
Apparently it's not 100 percent certain Boudreau will be back with the Canucks next year. Something about a clause in his contract leaving the possibility of an exit at season's end. Friedman was very surprised in hearing this possibility.
If he does leave, Jets should be all over this.
It could be Chevy has drafting mostly soft perimeter players. That don’t take the body and wait for other players to do the hard work to get points.Ken Wiebe:
Mistakes happen and the game happens at an incredibly high pace, which only heightens the importance of making the smart and sometimes safer play.
When it comes to defending, it’s hard to draw any other conclusion than the collective group simply not being committed enough.
Could the Jets benefit from some structural changes or tweaks to the system? Sure. But checking effectively often comes down to one characteristic that is highly controllable: Will.
***
Whomever is behind the bench next season has to figure out how to make some guys play with more will. Just not trying should not be an acceptable norm.
This article has been written every single year of Jets 2.0... sounds crazy but bringing in a coach with an actual system - instead of tweaking the system - could be the most obvious answer.Ken Wiebe:
Mistakes happen and the game happens at an incredibly high pace, which only heightens the importance of making the smart and sometimes safer play.
When it comes to defending, it’s hard to draw any other conclusion than the collective group simply not being committed enough.
Could the Jets benefit from some structural changes or tweaks to the system? Sure. But checking effectively often comes down to one characteristic that is highly controllable: Will.
***
Whomever is behind the bench next season has to figure out how to make some guys play with more will. Just not trying should not be an acceptable norm.