Just a tip for everyone. You should probably never defend someone with the argument that they're "not technically a pedophile". That's not gonna make you look very smart.
Even in a case where all parties (according to reports at least) are and have been above the general legal age of content, and the p-word doesn't really factor in anyhow?
In that kind of case, people insisting on using the word 'pedophile' seem to do that just to invoke the stigma and outrage the word carries. If money and power wasn't involved, the alleged Katz/Humpries encounter would be a legal act of sex under the Canadian law.
Katz' alleged actions are predatory and fall under the protection that a young person at the age of 16-17 has against such, but probably not pedophilia where non-predatory action wouldn't be. (And yes, IMO 50 years old shouldn't be doing none with 16-17 year olds)