A lot of people here clearly didn't read the article and assume guilt immediately ?because he's rich/old white man/others have done it/power/etc...
Some things to note here before you go all "hurr durr, old white man gonna be a creep; not surprising":
- The opposing counsel isn't exactly known for representing the most upstanding of characters (Alex Jones, neo nazis, racists)
- The plaintiff hasn't said anything about Katz, nor even mentioned anything about any encounters such as that
- The plaintiff's lawyers have essentially said the claim against Katz isn't true
- The people making the accusation against Katz (seemingly out of thin air) are the ones being accused of sexual misconduct/abuse by several women
I don't know about you, but there seem to be a lot of question marks here regarding the validity and the source of these claims. One would think that Katz would've been mentioned or named by the actual plaintiffs if this was true, but again, complex situation. Don't hear what I'm not saying either; this isn't minimizing what these girls have brought forward. But it is acknowledging all of the information infront of us and where it's coming from in regards to Katz. If he has done something like this, it is deplorable without a doubt.
All I'm saying is we need A LOT more information before making any judgements one way or the other about Katz's involvement.