New Accusations Edmonton Oilers owner Daryl Katz paid for sex with a teenager.

Status
Not open for further replies.

CantHaveTkachev

Cap Space > NHL players
Nov 30, 2004
52,699
34,851
St. OILbert, AB
So can you explain the following then:

1) If it was for a film project, why did he tell her not to tell anyone else?

2) Further, why was he concerned about about the age gap between them when it came to such a payment?

3) Third and most importantly, if it was for a film, why did he tell her it would be put on a debit card so she could spend it on “herself”?
who knows, but you're speculating

and sorry, but that ain't evidence
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Rodgerwilco

dasaybz

da saybz
Aug 2, 2005
2,767
1,983
716
Holy shit that's f***ing disgusting. What a vile putrid piece of crap. Dude, your in your 50s, and you want to play the hokey pokey with a teenager? Someone who's the age of maybe a grand daughter? Sickening.
 

Sinistril

Registered User
Oct 26, 2008
1,741
1,111
So can you explain the following then:

1) If it was for a film project, why did he tell her not to tell anyone else?

2) Further, why was he concerned about about the age gap between them when it came to such a payment?

3) Third and most importantly, if it was for a film, why did he tell her it would be put on a debit card so she could spend it on “herself”?

Why are the girls suing another couple for sexual assault and not Katz? And why is the couple being sued the ones bringing forward the allegation? Ah to make sure the women who are suing them look like liars. Way to play into sexual abusers hands
 

Hockeylife2018

Registered User
Nov 21, 2011
901
1,203
So can you explain the following then:

1) If it was for a film project, why did he tell her not to tell anyone else?

2) Further, why was he concerned about about the age gap between them when it came to such a payment?

3) Third and most importantly, if it was for a film, why did he tell her it would be put on a debit card so she could spend it on “herself”?
All really good questions, if we had more messages we may be able to connect those dots...but at this time both the girl and Katz deny anything happened between them....anything beyond that is nothing more then a guess
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dieseloil

nammerus

Registered User
Mar 9, 2003
6,232
4,545
Visit site
imagine invoking your “lord and savior’s” name to defend a sleazy billionaire who sollicited sex from a 17 year old

all in the typical days work of a good old Christian!

They’ve had plenty of practice defending their own pastors and ministers for similar offences.
 

PostBradMalone

Registered User
Mar 19, 2022
2,883
6,256
who knows, but you're speculating

and sorry, but that ain't evidence

Why are the girls suing another couple for sexual assault and not Katz? And why is the couple being sued the ones bringing forward the allegation? Ah to make sure the women who are suing them look like liars. Way to play into sexual abusers hands

All really good questions, if we had more messages we may be able to connect those dots...but at this time both the girl and Katz deny anything happened between them....anything beyond that is nothing more then a guess

So no answers from any of you to some very simple questions then. If you’re going to make (or support) declarative statements like “the money was totally for a movie bro!!1!!!” you should be able to provide explanations for three common sense lines of inquiry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rodgerwilco

saintunspecified

Registered User
Nov 30, 2017
6,364
4,592
I have more questions than comments here. Foremost is, how did Katz meet SH? Was it through the Buttons? And in what context? Was a relationship with the buttons previously established?

My read on this is that the buttons sound like prototypical abusers - abusing power/ influence in a elite athletic field to abuse the vulnerable. If Katz had a relationship with them, possibly extending to one of the button's victims, that's damning from a public opinion pov, regardless of what else may be proven.
 

Rodgerwilco

Entertainment boards w/ some Hockey mixed in.
Feb 6, 2014
8,089
7,643
I love how literally no one believes in the basis of western judicial systems anymore, innocent until proven guilty.
Innocent until proven guilty relates to criminical prosecution and detention.

It has absolutely nothing to do with people forming their own opinions about guilt or innocence based on their experience and available evidence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kodoshin and orby

OG Eberle

Registered User
Aug 25, 2011
1,572
1,980
A lot of people here clearly didn't read the article and assume guilt immediately ?because he's rich/old white man/others have done it/power/etc...

Some things to note here before you go all "hurr durr, old white man gonna be a creep; not surprising":

- The opposing counsel isn't exactly known for representing the most upstanding of characters (Alex Jones, neo nazis, racists)
- The plaintiff hasn't said anything about Katz, nor even mentioned anything about any encounters such as that
- The plaintiff's lawyers have essentially said the claim against Katz isn't true
- The people making the accusation against Katz (seemingly out of thin air) are the ones being accused of sexual misconduct/abuse by several women

I don't know about you, but there seem to be a lot of question marks here regarding the validity and the source of these claims. One would think that Katz would've been mentioned or named by the actual plaintiffs if this was true, but again, complex situation. Don't hear what I'm not saying either; this isn't minimizing what these girls have brought forward. But it is acknowledging all of the information infront of us and where it's coming from in regards to Katz. If he has done something like this, it is deplorable without a doubt.

All I'm saying is we need A LOT more information before making any judgements one way or the other about Katz's involvement.
 

CantHaveTkachev

Cap Space > NHL players
Nov 30, 2004
52,699
34,851
St. OILbert, AB
So no answers from any of you to some very simple questions then. If you’re going to make (or support) declarative statements like “the money was totally for a movie bro!!1!!!” you should be able to provide explanations for three common sense lines of inquiry.
who said that?

Are you really comparing this to getting a rub n tug at a massage parlor or am I missing something else he did…?
I'm saying people with billions of dollars are gross
Robert Kraft, Bill Gates and Epstein Island
 

HanSolo

DJ Crazy Times
Apr 7, 2008
99,470
35,862
Las Vegas
Now that it's public, there's no way Katz can settle it now and essentially admit guilt.
Settlement agreements are almost universally contingent on a clause that the the Defendant makes no admission of liability. I know that's not always how the public views it, but sometimes people just settle to expedite making the claims go away rather than spend years fighting said claims.

I'm not saying Katz didn't do it but a settlement agreement shouldn't be viewed as proof of liability or guilt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Silky Johnson

saintunspecified

Registered User
Nov 30, 2017
6,364
4,592
But it is acknowledging all of the information infront of us and where it's
All I'm saying is we need A LOT more information before making any judgements one way or the other about Katz's involvement.
I agree. One shouldn't trust text messages that were in the possession of Sage Humphries' alleged abusers. They could be edited/taken out of context or whatever to make it look bad. I mean, I think the fact that they had those text messages looks pretty bad for *them". I mean, if SH got paid for sex, and they had the texts, what does it make them?

But the point remains - why was Katz even involved with such people? Could it be a coincidence, or bad luck? Could it be he was a victim of a possible blackmail scheme? Could it be that he's the sort of person who knows people who traffic girls or women of particular sorts? And the last possibility is damning.
 

Rodgerwilco

Entertainment boards w/ some Hockey mixed in.
Feb 6, 2014
8,089
7,643
So no answers from any of you to some very simple questions then. If you’re going to make (or support) declarative statements like “the money was totally for a movie bro!!1!!!” you should be able to provide explanations for three common sense lines of inquiry.
The one guy literally replied "Who knows?"

lol.
 

GirardSpinorama

Registered User
Aug 20, 2004
21,872
10,848
Settlement agreements are almost universally contingent on a clause that the the Defendant makes no admission of liability. I know that's not always how the public views it, but sometimes people just settle to expedite making the claims go away rather than spend years fighting said claims.

I'm not saying Katz didn't do it but a settlement agreement shouldn't be viewed as proof of liability or guilt.
Oh I mean admitting guilt in the public eye, not in the court of law. For a public figure, that's all that matters.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad