Player Discussion: Neal Pionk Part 2

Bob E

Registered User
Aug 20, 2011
8,180
2,687
Winnerpeg
If Pionk continues to put up 50+ point seasons, what is his next contract going to be?

I'm not sure I pay Pionk $6.5M per, though that likely becomes his market value.

The change to Pionk and Trouba’s analytics since the trade has me wondering about Rasmus Ristolainen again. Could a change of scenery and new partner have a profound impact to his analytics?

Not sure RR has the hockey IQ to be successful but he may surprise and be a steal for someone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GNP

Whileee

Registered User
May 29, 2010
46,538
34,962
If Pionk continues to put up 50+ point seasons, what is his next contract going to be?

I'm not sure I pay Pionk $6.5M per, though that likely becomes his market value.

The change to Pionk and Trouba’s analytics since the trade has me wondering about Rasmus Ristolainen again. Could a change of scenery and new partner have a profound impact to his analytics?

Not sure RR has the hockey IQ to be successful but he may surprise and be a steal for someone.
I remain skeptical of the metrics for players in tough roles on really bad teams, especially defensemen. Look at Doughty's shot metrics. He's fallen off a cliff since the Kings went into a nosedive - worse than Ristolainen in the past two seasons. That said, Pionk's metrics with the Rangers were over just a couple of years, and Risto's numbers have been problematic for a longer period.

But I wouldn't be shocked if Risto had better metrics if he moved to a better team and environment.
 

Adam da bomb

Registered User
May 1, 2016
13,169
10,198
If Pionk continues to put up 50+ point seasons, what is his next contract going to be?

I'm not sure I pay Pionk $6.5M per, though that likely becomes his market value.

The change to Pionk and Trouba’s analytics since the trade has me wondering about Rasmus Ristolainen again. Could a change of scenery and new partner have a profound impact to his analytics?

Not sure RR has the hockey IQ to be successful but he may surprise and be a steal for someone.
If Pionk is the 2nd best D after Samberg and Heinola arrive what's wrong with paying him 6.5? You don't need 4 top wingers after Wheeler's deal ends you shift money to paying your top 2 D well. You can alocate the money from little to Little's replacement and the money from Perrault and and what Laine is earning right now goes to Laine's next deal. Then you have a younger cheaper guy like Apple/Harkins/Roslo complete your top 6 who are cheaper. If they price themselves out you have someone else in your pool who goes from prospect to 2nd line.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kellhunter and Jet

Bob E

Registered User
Aug 20, 2011
8,180
2,687
Winnerpeg
I remain skeptical of the metrics for players in tough roles on really bad teams, especially defensemen. Look at Doughty's shot metrics. He's fallen off a cliff since the Kings went into a nosedive - worse than Ristolainen in the past two seasons. That said, Pionk's metrics with the Rangers were over just a couple of years, and Risto's numbers have been problematic for a longer period.

But I wouldn't be shocked if Risto had better metrics if he moved to a better team and environment.
How about with the Jets?

Morrissey-Ristolainen (Trade)
Samberg-Pionk
Edmundson (FA)-DeMelo
Poolman

I think Hamonic or Edmundson signs with Jets this summer, which may mean there’s no need for Risto. But if not, Risto adds size, physicality and offence to the d corps.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: GNP

Bob E

Registered User
Aug 20, 2011
8,180
2,687
Winnerpeg
If Pionk is the 2nd best D after Samberg and Heinola arrive what's wrong with paying him 6.5? You don't need 4 top wingers after Wheeler's deal ends you shift money to paying your top 2 D well. You can alocate the money from little to Little's replacement and the money from Perrault and and what Laine is earning right now goes to Laine's next deal. Then you have a younger cheaper guy like Apple/Harkins/Roslo complete your top 6 who are cheaper. If they price themselves out you have someone else in your pool who goes from prospect to 2nd line.
I suppose. If Pionk is putting up 50+ points a year, with solid defensive play, why not pay him.
 

Upperdeckjet

Registered User
Dec 14, 2011
830
1,207
Re-signing Pionk is going to be an interesting conversation as we end the year and go through the summer. No doubt he is a very good NHL defenseman. I'm thinking if we commit to Pionk and Morrissey as our 1a/1b, we need to have a real strong supporting cast along with them. By strong, I do mean physically strong.

I would move on from Niku and hope that Heinola matures. I am really counting on Samberg. Tucker Poolman as a 7th would be fine for me. I have also come around on Kulikov as a number 6 for the right price if he would be happy playing both sides as needed for a few years. I would be looking for a stud horse # 2 right side defenseman. I think Chevy, Maurice and our captain know exactly what changes are needed on our defense. I think a physical presence on your back end is a requirement to be successful in the NHL down the stretch and during the playoffs.

I simply do not see a spot / role for Niku if we commit to Pionk while at the same time, maintain high hopes for Heinola.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: GNP and hn777

DRW204

Registered User
Dec 26, 2010
23,082
28,586
I think anything over 6m for Pionk is to much. Imo I don't think he is all that great defensively, and he's benefitting immensely from high PP TOI and points (secondary assists), he has already far surpassed the amount of pp1 time that Trouba got last year when he hit 50 pts. Yeah he's racking up points on the PP but IMO he is not that great of a distributor or a shooter and he's been part of the reason it has been underwhelming this year. His 5v5 scoring is not all that great either despite a player who does have some solid offensive tools.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Farmboy Patty

Adam da bomb

Registered User
May 1, 2016
13,169
10,198
I think anything over 6m for Pionk is to much. Imo I don't think he is all that great defensively, and he's benefitting immensely from high PP TOI and points (secondary assists), he has already far surpassed the amount of pp1 time that Trouba got last year when he hit 50 pts. Yeah he's racking up points on the PP but IMO he is not that great of a distributor or a shooter and he's been part of the reason it has been underwhelming this year. His 5v5 scoring is not all that great either despite a player who does have some solid offensive tools.
Agree to disagree. His gap control against Caps was a thing of beauty. He gets his shot through a lot more than Trouba.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kellhunter and Jet

GNP

Here Comes the Jets -look out hockey world !!!
Oct 11, 2016
9,483
13,706
Winnipeg
If Pionk continues to put up 50+ point seasons, what is his next contract going to be?

I'm not sure I pay Pionk $6.5M per, though that likely becomes his market value.

The change to Pionk and Trouba’s analytics since the trade has me wondering about Rasmus Ristolainen again. Could a change of scenery and new partner have a profound impact to his analytics?

Not sure RR has the hockey IQ to be successful but he may surprise and be a steal for someone.
_________________________________________________

I don't know how good Risto is ? but if he's above average, Chevy should take a run at him. I like his size and physicality but can he play ?
 

KingBogo

Admitted Homer
Nov 29, 2011
32,739
43,589
Winnipeg
I'm continually impressed with his defensive work as an offensive leaning guy. He'll be just over 200 NHL games after this season so he still has some improvement there too. I pay him 6.5 for sure
Yeah I'm hoping for something in the Morrissey range. And I'd really like to see Chevy lock him up this summer. I'm really hoping he feels like he has landed in a good spot and wants to stay long term.
 

Duke749

Savannah Ghost Pirates
Apr 6, 2010
48,276
23,844
Canton, Georgia
I'm continually impressed with his defensive work as an offensive leaning guy. He'll be just over 200 NHL games after this season so he still has some improvement there too. I pay him 6.5 for sure

I’m hoping he doesn’t cost that much but if so, so be it. Think we still get good value in that contract with the improvement we’ve seen alone this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jet

Whileee

Registered User
May 29, 2010
46,538
34,962
Poink 6-38 = 44 points +11
Trouba 7-20= 27 points - 12
Differential of 23 goals for and against Pretty high I would think
Plus/minus isn't a reliable metric. But Pionk is considerably better than Trouba on just about every performance metric this season.

It's to the point that I'm a bit concerned about Pionk's next contract. It could be too rich.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kellhunter

Adam da bomb

Registered User
May 1, 2016
13,169
10,198
Plus/minus isn't a reliable metric. But Pionk is considerably better than Trouba on just about every performance metric this season.

It's to the point that I'm a bit concerned about Pionk's next contract. It could be too rich.
While don't we have him for another season still? If his contract is too rich and the Jets can't afford him they can trade him at the trade deadline for a 1st and a great prospect.
 

Daximus

Wow, what a terrific audience.
Sponsor
Oct 11, 2014
39,895
26,913
Five Hills
While don't we have him for another season still? If his contract is too rich and the Jets can't afford him they can trade him at the trade deadline for a 1st and a great prospect.

No keep him. I'd pay $7 right now pretty easily. If we can get MoJo and Pionk bigger more physical linemates we can be a good team. Samberg might be the answer to Pionk if he signs. Heinola could also work well in a 2 pairing role.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kellhunter

DEANYOUNGBLOOD17

Registered User
May 10, 2011
3,521
1,535
No keep him. I'd pay $7 right now pretty easily. If we can get MoJo and Pionk bigger more physical linemates we can be a good team. Samberg might be the answer to Pionk if he signs. Heinola could also work well in a 2 pairing role.
$7 is below the $650,000 minimum ..... just buy a reduced beer $7 bud lite at the next Jets game....

We have him for one more year on his current contract at team friendly rate..... He will then be a RFA owing us 1 more year b4 he gets to UFA....

That will be when Chevy can do his sweet thing and get him on a Morrissey type contract.

If he does not want to sign a team friendly contract we can do a 1 year arbitration awarded deal and trade him at the tdl
 

DRW204

Registered User
Dec 26, 2010
23,082
28,586
Agree to disagree. His gap control against Caps was a thing of beauty. He gets his shot through a lot more than Trouba.

if you are noticing pionk shoot more on the PP that's a problem. he should not be shooting, it should be going to Laine. However, Pionk is crap at setting Laine up for the One-T and has to throw it on net or go back to Wheeler.

i am fully anticipating Pionk to get more $ than Morrissey. Total Points and TOI are usually the drivers for Dmen salaries, and Pionk leads the Jets in both. He is one of the most reliant Dmen in the league on PP for point production (2nd among Dmen in the top 50 for PP points to total points ratio). He should be grateful he's a RHD and has that role on the PP to individually bank points, but his presence on there has been one of the reasons the PP has been underwhelming this year after 2 years of being top 5
 

Adam da bomb

Registered User
May 1, 2016
13,169
10,198
if you are noticing pionk shoot more on the PP that's a problem. he should not be shooting, it should be going to Laine. However, Pionk is crap at setting Laine up for the One-T and has to throw it on net or go back to Wheeler.

i am fully anticipating Pionk to get more $ than Morrissey. Total Points and TOI are usually the drivers for Dmen salaries, and Pionk leads the Jets in both. He is one of the most reliant Dmen in the league on PP for point production (2nd among Dmen in the top 50 for PP points to total points ratio). He should be grateful he's a RHD and has that role on the PP to individually bank points, but his presence on there has been one of the reasons the PP has been underwhelming this year after 2 years of being top 5
That’s how Connor gets his pts is deflections on pp. If all Laine can do is one t and has no other shoots that’s a problem with a capital P.
Pp has dried up because of predictability. It is the exact same for last 3 yrs.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: snowkiddin

DRW204

Registered User
Dec 26, 2010
23,082
28,586
That’s how Connor gets his pts is deflections on pp. If all Laine can do is one t and has no other shoots that’s a problem with a capital P.
Pp has dried up because of predictability. It is the exact same for last 3 yrs.
Connor doesn't have a single pp goal in which it deflected off a pionk shot where pionk would be the 1A

There's other shots other than Laine of course however it's due to Pionks inadequacy at setting up Laine is why you are noticing Pionk shooting more. Pionk should probably be the very last option on the pp1 to shoot

Maurice shares some blame for the pp struggles for sure I never said pionk was the sole reason, however, you cannot tell me from watching the games that Pionk is elevating that PP, I'd say he's holding it back due to his inefficiency of setting up Laine.
 

Adam da bomb

Registered User
May 1, 2016
13,169
10,198
Connor doesn't have a single pp goal in which it deflected off a pionk shot where pionk would be the 1A

There's other shots other than Laine of course however it's due to Pionks inadequacy at setting up Laine is why you are noticing Pionk shooting more. Pionk should probably be the very last option on the pp1 to shoot

Maurice shares some blame for the pp struggles for sure I never said pionk was the sole reason, however, you cannot tell me from watching the games that Pionk is elevating that PP, I'd say he's holding it back due to his inefficiency of setting up Laine.
Buff hardly ever set up Laine it was usually Wheeler. I also think Wheeler is the last person who should be shooting on pp. pionk is good at holding puck in their zone. His shot doesn’t get blocked as much as Trouba’s did and he doesn’t always try and shoot it. Maybe Niku would have been better at it if he could figure out the D thing. Maybe Heinola will be better.
pionk rarely makes bad turnovers virtually perfect compared to Tuba. His gaps are great. He has been one of our best D defensively.
 
  • Like
Reactions: snowkiddin

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad