http://www.dispatch.com/content/sto...ino-tax-money-may-help-keep-jackets-here.html
Here's what I'd like to know.
The issue has been the lease since the team's dicey financial situation hit the public consciousness a couple years ago. The lease is primarily with Nationwide (90% owners of the arena), yet the solutions put forth seem to revolve around public financing. So...
Help me understand the revenue generated by the lease and by the real estate development that has taken place in the Arena District. I would think Nationwide would have a substantial interest in maintaining the CBJ as primary tenant in the centerpiece of its development, but that hasn't materialized (yea, I know they've let the team forego payments, etc.). Why not? Maybe Nationwide does not (somehow) stand to lose a significant amount of money should the team move. Maybe Nationwide is holding out that public money will save it from having to renegotiate the lease.
http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/sports/2011/08/07/arace-redo.html
That's pretty nebulous.
This sounds like a game of chicken between public officials and Nationwide as to who's going to cave first to commit money to aid the CBJ.
That's the same problem I have, DSL. Yes, the city and all of those who support what the CBJ has meant to it stand to lose greatly, but doesn't Nationwide stand to lose even more? Surely the money they get from the burdensome lease is a drop in the bucket compared to what they potentially could lose in revenue and prestige if the Arena sits empty in the District? I'm sure that the development of condos and offices in the area has been profitable; but are they, and all the restaurants and bars that have cropped up in the area, to a point of self-sufficiency without the traffic and activity generated by forty (+?) nights of hockey over six months? It's the Arena and the CBJ that have made that the thriving development that has put big bucks in Nationwide's corporate pockets, and it's Nationwide that should make the greatest concessions to keep the Jackets healthy and in Columbus. I have no problem with some casino dollars flowing the Jackets way (hell, I've always voted for the tax initiatives, too!), but not until Nationwide redoes the lease to relieve the pressure on the team and give it the revenue flow that every other team in the league enjoys. If the city provides the total solution, Nationwide will happily sit back and continue to reap the blessings of a one-sided lease that benefits them to the exclusion of all others. Let the landlord make the first, and most significant, contribution to solving the problems, then allow the city to graciously chime in to help resolve the situation. Ultimately, all will benefit.