Sorry missed this.I think Tomasino should pan out better than Novak, and that Fabbro is a really good player... but... they are all in the "soft-ish" category of player. Skilled enough that both forwards can be top-6 complementary options, and Fabbro has been a great partner for Josi even though he's not flashy enough for Josi to like him, but... they need a certain kind of coach/system in order to flourish.
That coach/system does not currently exist in Nashville, which is why we here list them as "expendable". But it's also a coach/system which doesn't seem especially common elsewhere in the NHL either, nor particularly aligned with the current playoff trends for heavy/nasty players in support roles. So YMMV on those guys. I'm not sure a contending team like the Leafs, which thus far might have had specific issues in those areas, is really going to be the best place to get the most out of those players? They're good/skilled. But they might almost need to go to more of a building/non-contender type of team to improve their odds of breaking out?
Yeah. It's not a slam dunk win, but I like said- I like the upside, though I've switched to preferring Tomasino.
Would really come down to the Leafs pro-scouting/ Tre / Berube. If they think Fabbro can be their Forsling/Montour and that a bridge deal Tomasino take a step and get the job done with Matthews for the next three years- giddy up. Those are two big pieces of the puzzle.
But if they don't believe in the upside in the specific players I think it any deal would be DOA for the stylistic reasons you mention.