Porter Stoutheart
Seen Stamkos?
- Jun 14, 2017
- 16,047
- 12,484
We can split the rookie camp/showcase and the main camp into separate threads, right? Sure...
Next game is Friday. Maybe another day or two but they should have the first waive before Thursday so the coaching staff can start turning their attention towards the main team and closer to NHL prospects.I was thinking based on the schedule that today would be a logical "first cuts" day... ?
I was thinking based on the schedule that today would be a logical "first cuts" day... ?
Pretty minor cuts. Basically all the CHL kids minus the camp standouts. Ultimately, theyll all likely be sent down but theyve earned a bit more time.
Big body with a shot. Never have enough of those!Definitely points to the idea that Gosjic is separating from himself from the pack of recent non first round draft picks. Almost no chance he ultimately makes the roster but has definitely moved into a prospect to keep a close eye on this coming season.
Then who gets cuts/demoted?Frankly if you do well in camp you should get rewarded in some way. If they continue to play well they should continue to be here.
Well, normally you send junior guys back early, since their seasons are already started. Which is what just happened. Then we have a boatload of AHL-contract/AHL-only players who I guess there is no point in sending back until Milwaukee's camp opens? Which I read is still not until Oct. 1? But I would pretty much mass demote everybody who is not in the running by Sept. 30... all the AHL guys can go back on that day, aside from half a dozen or so who may be at least remotely in the running here.Then who gets cuts/demoted?
Whoever isn't playing well. See that's the great thing about having young players and depth, you don't need to keep the old or not so great players around once they get passed up. Schenn, Lauzon, Carrier or Fabbro can all go as far as I'm concerned.Then who gets cuts/demoted?
I feel the same about McCarron, Jankowski and Smith.Whoever isn't playing well. See that's the great thing about having young players and depth, you don't need to keep the old or not so great players around once they get passed up. Schenn, Lauzon, Carrier or Fabbro can all go as far as I'm concerned.
Yep same thing there. As long as you have replacements move them on out if someone is outplaying them. If you waive them and someone picks them up, tell them thank you and move on.I feel the same about McCarron, Jankowski and Smith.
I'd love to see that happen this year but I believe the young guys will push them out next year.Yep same thing there. As long as you have replacements move them on out if someone is outplaying them. If you waive them and someone picks them up, tell them thank you and move on.
I probably would have gone Smith ahead of McCarron? But anyway, lots of teams have some very generic 4th liners employed at minimal salaries, I don't think those are necessarily the roles we even want our better young prospects to aspire to?In that vein, when you list McCarron, Jankowski and Smith, I would say McCarron has done more to carve out a role than the other two.
The irony for me is that I think Fabbro is probably, secretly, the best of these 4. But we'll never know it. He'll go somewhere else next year and hopefully prove it.Similarly, when you list Schenn, Lauzon, Carrier and Fabbro, I would say Carrier is a class above and Lauzon has carved out a specific role.
It's all good until it displaces Tomasino or Parsnip. Then there will be much weeping and gnashing of teeth around here.Frankly if you do well in camp you should get rewarded in some way. If they continue to play well they should continue to be here.
The gnashing happens when some guys like that DON'T outplay Tomasino or Parsnip, yet displace them anyway.It's all good until it displaces Tomasino or Parsnip. Then there will be much weeping and gnashing of teeth around here.
Ehhh, I'm desperate so I'll watchDoes it really count if it’s an intra squad game?