Gorton violated the Bruins last deadline.Guy's on pace for 41 goals
The great Beleskey is even outscoring Rick Nash this season!

Gorton violated the Bruins last deadline.Guy's on pace for 41 goals
He’s a good prospect to many people, which I can understand, but I disagree completely with anyone thinking he’s better than just good. For me, he’s not even that. I think he’s a pretty good prospect, but that was a bad pick. Not a terrible pick, not a franchise-destroying pick, but a bad pick nonetheless. Especially when Liljegren, Mittelstadt, and Brannstrom were all still there. And those are only the players I wanted at the time.He's a very good prospect and I don't really understand anyone who can argue that much with the pick.
Agreed.I always shake my head at Staal jumping up, but that was a decent play. Good chance.
So is our penalty killKoffing is like the worst Pokémon.
It’s basically a purple fart
I’ll believer McLord gets sent down when I believe itI hope Cody McLeod likes Connecticut.
Belesky is a clear upgrade owing to the fact he can actually hockey.
This will take time though for him to start scoring moreAgain there’s evidence of Lias’ quick release, still needs to use his shot much more
So weird NHL.com has him listed as having assist according to team stats but not under box score lolReally? It changed for me just recently.
He’s a good prospect to many people, which I can understand, but I disagree completely with anyone thinking he’s better than just good. For me, he’s not even that. I think he’s a pretty good prospect, but that was a bad pick. Not a terrible pick, not a franchise-destroying pick, but a bad pick nonetheless. Especially when Liljegren, Mittelstadt, and Brannstrom were all still there.
Liljegren and Branstrom are awesome prospects but are playing in a league where lias preformed at near ppg. As for Mittlesdat hes extremly overrated imho. If the Rangers are gonna regret taking someone its Suzuki but you’re underselling liasHe’s a good prospect to many people, which I can understand, but I disagree completely with anyone thinking he’s better than just good. For me, he’s not even that. I think he’s a pretty good prospect, but that was a bad pick. Not a terrible pick, not a franchise-destroying pick, but a bad pick nonetheless. Especially when Liljegren, Mittelstadt, and Brannstrom were all still there.
Liljegren and Branstrom are awesome prospects but are playing in a league where lias preformed at ppg. As for Mittlesdat hes extremly overrated imho. If the Rangers are gonna regret taking someone its Suzuki but you’re underselling lias
He’s really not. I just don’t see it. I’ve seen him do well in other leagues, fine. However, there have been many players that got over a point per game in lower leagues, including the AHL, and could never translate it to the NHL. I understand why people like Lias, but I see him as an excellent 3rd liner (maybe a below average 2nd liner) at best. I also value prospects with high ceilings (and low floors) much more than prospects with high floors (and low ceilings).Lias has had multiple good games in nearly every league hes played in which is why he was a top 10 pick, so yes he is a really good prospect
He’s really not. I just don’t see it. I’ve seen him do well in other leagues, fine. However, there have been many players that got over a point per game in lower leagues, including the AHL, and could never translate it to the NHL. I understand why people like Lias, but I see him as an excellent 3rd liner (maybe a below average 2nd liner) at best. I also value prospects with high ceilings (and low floors) much more than prospects with high floors (and low ceilings).
I have a huge bias in favor of offensive, puck-moving Swedish d-men. And Liljegren was projected to be a top 5 pick before he fell. And I always loved Brannstrom.I'm sorry, but this is just an insane argument to me. Who had Liljegren or Brannstrom that high? Only you? Mittelstadt I can understand, although I haven't been impressed with his development and don't really think it was that shocking a team could prefer Lias over him.
It sounds like you just have some ingrained bias against him and regardless of how he develops you won't accept that he is a very good prospect.
Maybe not, but it works for me. I don’t completely discount “safe” prospects, but I prefer to take a gamble on prospects who can potentially become game-changing players.I mean, that's fine and it's good you recognize that, but it's not a good way to value prospects at all.