Proposal: MTL & SJ

Status
Not open for further replies.

Topcheese31

Registered User
Nov 21, 2023
79
98
Ya change the pieces to Hage and SJ adds a late pick, then it’s better than this proposal, in which Grier passes easily.
The main piece is the SJ piece in the current proposal.
Why would the Habs trade Hage vs Chernyshov + late pick ? i do not think grier would have passes easily on that trade if it was the case.

In any case, Chernyshov is worth more than Bogdan + Strubble. I do not see a team trade a player that they draft two month ago.

Obviously not by himself. It would be a package including Chernyshov.
You're so far of the value. Chernyshov would not be the main piece of the package.
 

Topcheese31

Registered User
Nov 21, 2023
79
98
Show me where I said Chernyshov would be the main piece of the package, please.
No where.

I just do see why somebody would name a player that is not the main peace in a trade.

I would like Habs to trade for Matthews. Jake Evans would be in the package
 
  • Like
Reactions: viceroy

Juxtaposer

Outro: Divina Comedia
Dec 21, 2009
50,177
24,016
Bay Area
No where.

I just do see why somebody would name a player that is not the main peace in a trade.

I would like Habs to trade for Matthews. Jake Evans would be in the package
People say "I would only trade player X in a package for player Y" literally all the time on this forum.

I think you know that.
 

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
71,622
15,325
Folsom
I think the point was that Chernyshov doesn't bring you a Dobson level prospect/player.
Which is entirely beside the point of the post that poster was responding to. Nobody said Chernyshov would bring in a Dobson-level prospect/player. All that has been said is that's the only type of asset that they would make him available for. That's a completely different thing to say and not an insane thing as that person claimed.
 

Spearmint Rhino

Registered User
Sep 17, 2013
9,332
9,352
Sharks would be dumb not to make this trade

Habs track record trading D for F is abysmal and you get 2 chances to burn us :sarcasm:
 

Lockin17

Registered User
Jul 31, 2018
3,841
2,994
The point is Bodgan and Struble are NHL ready and would make the team this year easily top 4 for SJ.
Chernyshov is a project that could take 3 years to make the NHL, Might end up better might not.
Not saying the Chernyshov dosen't have the potentiel but Bogdan is twice the player playing in the same league at the moment.
And you guy's calling for Hage lolll jezzz get lost
 

The Devilish Buffoon

Registered User
Dec 24, 2018
12,714
11,505
While SJ wont trade a prospect drafted so recently, and the value is still a little off anyways, the “superior forward prospect for two inferior D prospects” dynamic makes some sense for both teams. There are issues with the proposal but the thought behind it shows some insight into team need from both ends
 

Xirik

Registered User
Sep 24, 2014
10,007
14,822
Alberta
The point is Bodgan and Struble are NHL ready and would make the team this year easily top 4 for SJ.
Chernyshov is a project that could take 3 years to make the NHL, Might end up better might not.
Not saying the Chernyshov dosen't have the potentiel but Bogdan is twice the player playing in the same league at the moment.
And you guy's calling for Hage lolll jezzz get lost
1. Why is SJ needing NHL ready players right away? are they aiming to make the playoffs next season?
2. Chernyshov is one of the closest to ready players in this last draft.

3.



45. Chernyshov
72. Hage

Bogdan where?
 

hohosaregood

Banned
Sep 1, 2011
33,158
13,800
The point is Bodgan and Struble are NHL ready and would make the team this year easily top 4 for SJ.
Chernyshov is a project that could take 3 years to make the NHL, Might end up better might not.
Not saying the Chernyshov dosen't have the potentiel but Bogdan is twice the player playing in the same league at the moment.
And you guy's calling for Hage lolll jezzz get lost
So why would the Habs want a lesser prospect like Chernyshov when you have 2 NHL ready top 4 defensemen?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grinner

CanadienShark

Registered User
Dec 18, 2012
40,076
14,772
While SJ wont trade a prospect drafted so recently, and the value is still a little off anyways, the “superior forward prospect for two inferior D prospects” dynamic makes some sense for both teams. There are issues with the proposal but the thought behind it shows some insight into team need from both ends
No it doesn't. This post shows you don't have insight into the Sharks needs. We need a high end RHD. The Habs have two prospects in that vein and they're obviously not available.
 

Lockin17

Registered User
Jul 31, 2018
3,841
2,994
So why would the Habs want a lesser prospect like Chernyshov when you have 2 NHL ready top 4 defensemen?
Not easy to understand i get it,,, but these guys are not what the Habs need right now but SJ could sure use them right now.

Chernyshov might be a unicor or a burst we don't know.

So Habs are taking a chance giving decent prospects for a *Unicorne*.
OR You guy's think Chenyshov is a God,, allright keep him.
 

Grinner

Registered User
May 31, 2022
1,888
1,477
Not easy to understand i get it,,, but these guys are not what the Habs need right now but SJ could sure use them right now.

Chernyshov might be a unicor or a burst we don't know.

So Habs are taking a chance giving decent prospects for a *Unicorne*.
OR You guy's think Chenyshov is a God,, allright keep him.
Get lost indeed
 
  • Like
Reactions: thefutures

Xirik

Registered User
Sep 24, 2014
10,007
14,822
Alberta
Not easy to understand i get it,,, but these guys are not what the Habs need right now but SJ could sure use them right now.

Chernyshov might be a unicor or a burst we don't know.

So Habs are taking a chance giving decent prospects for a *Unicorne*.
OR You guy's think Chenyshov is a God,, allright keep him.
chernyshov.jpg
 

The Devilish Buffoon

Registered User
Dec 24, 2018
12,714
11,505
No it doesn't. This post shows you don't have insight into the Sharks needs. We need a high end RHD. The Habs have two prospects in that vein and they're obviously not available.
Hey, fair enough. I agree that the Sharks primarily need is a high end RD and that they are not going to get one from MTL without giving up a legit top fwd prospect.

That said, I still view SJ’s forward pool better than their D pool as whole. The Habs have an embarassment of riches on the back end and can probably parlay two lesser D into a very good forward prospect. SJ seemed like a team who could potentially take advantage of that, but I’ll tale your word for it that I’m off
about that
 
  • Like
Reactions: CanadienShark

Stewie Griffin

What the deuce
May 9, 2019
5,331
8,705
Canada
The sharks D pool sucks but it's full of lefties, especially bottom pairing ones like Struble. There is absolutely 0 need for us to make this trade.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad