Player Discussion Morgan Rielly

nuck

Schrodingers Cat
Aug 18, 2005
11,637
2,676
I don't think the trade would be crazy

Detroit - Compher
Seattle - Oleksiak
Calgary - Weegar? We'd need to add to Rielly or maybe Coleman
Vancouver - Garland and/or Soucy
Los Angeles - Not sure what the deal looks
I don't think he waves for Detroit and Compher doesn't really make them a better club.

Weegar is the same age but better and cheaper so I can't see any Calgary interest. If the Flames finish strong maybe they look at adding to their D this summer so perhaps a Coleman. The Flames like him a lot but he is a winger and their real need is at C.

I don't think Van would move their 3rd leading scorer and Soucy looks bad this year but I think Rielly would waive to go there. If they value Mo enough they actually have room for an LD. I am not sure how much better Garland makes them because they have wingers coming up but he has value and only 1 more year on his deal.

I don't think LA has any cap space once they are healthy but if they want to move Gavrikov that could be a start. However their roster core has a lot of age so would they want to add Mo into his senior years?

Seattle does seem like a place he might waive for but I don't know what they would give up. Oleksiak is not the popular guy of a couple of years ago but he would be more attractive if he was a righty.

For sure its possible but I find it difficult to imagine solving any of their weaknesses if they find a taker he would waive for. The big thing would be if they recognize the value of getting out from under that $7.5M for the next 5 years. We know they are going to get raunched by Marners agent this summer so it could have needed long term cap benefits. But are Shanny and Tre taking the long view now or is it survival? Another short playoff would generate a real shakeup from the Prez on down so who knows?
 
  • Like
Reactions: arso40

WTFMAN99

Registered User
Jun 17, 2009
34,327
12,488
I don't think he waves for Detroit and Compher doesn't really make them a better club.

Weegar is the same age but better and cheaper so I can't see any Calgary interest. If the Flames finish strong maybe they look at adding to their D this summer so perhaps a Coleman. The Flames like him a lot but he is a winger and their real need is at C.

I don't think Van would move their 3rd leading scorer and Soucy looks bad this year but I think Rielly would waive to go there. If they value Mo enough they actually have room for an LD. I am not sure how much better Garland makes them because they have wingers coming up but he has value and only 1 more year on his deal.

I don't think LA has any cap space once they are healthy but if they want to move Gavrikov that could be a start. However their roster core has a lot of age so would they want to add Mo into his senior years?

Seattle does seem like a place he might waive for but I don't know what they would give up. Oleksiak is not the popular guy of a couple of years ago but he would be more attractive if he was a righty.

For sure its possible but I find it difficult to imagine solving any of their weaknesses if they find a taker he would waive for. The big thing would be if they recognize the value of getting out from under that $7.5M for the next 5 years. We know they are going to get raunched by Marners agent this summer so it could have needed long term cap benefits. But are Shanny and Tre taking the long view now or is it survival? Another short playoff would generate a real shakeup from the Prez on down so who knows?

AC pointed out that Rielly's wife is from the Michigan / Windsor area (forget) so that might make the Detroit one more viable. Compher is a right shot centre that could likely work as our 3C.

Vancouver would be the one Rielly likely wants the most, Garland is pretty good but it frees up money long term.

LAK is a hard fit to imagine.

Oleksiak has historically played on his off side as a left shot but he's older now, might be hard with his skating.

Calgary...we'd need to add for Weegar 100%, no way around it but they actually have Andersson, Pachal and Mirondov as right shot D. Weegar plays LD for them but their LD otherwise is Bean and Bahl so Rielly would be a big upgrade as a natural left shot but we would need to add something else that is attractive to them. I'd need to think on what that actually is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arso40

Stephen

Moderator
Feb 28, 2002
82,209
60,524
Most likely, Rielly is staying put for the duration of the contract and it's going to be a slog.

If cap space permits I almost wouldn't mind just investing in a higher end number one D and just moving Rielly and his cap hit to LW or something like that. His tunnel vision rushing and remaining speed isn't bad and can be shifted away from a more critical position on the blueline. Alleviate him of the defensive responsibilities he's not really great at handling in the first place.
 

JT AM da real deal

Registered User
Oct 4, 2018
12,382
7,791
Most likely, Rielly is staying put for the duration of the contract and it's going to be a slog.

If cap space permits I almost wouldn't mind just investing in a higher end number one D and just moving Rielly and his cap hit to LW or something like that. His tunnel vision rushing and remaining speed isn't bad and can be shifted away from a more critical position on the blueline. Alleviate him of the defensive responsibilities he's not really great at handling in the first place.
It might work but he would be an expensive 4th line LWer .. he couldn't produce offensively on 1st 3 lines and he doesn't hit so 4th line might be a bad fit .. to me 4th line C is more likely
 
  • Like
Reactions: arso40

sunstersun

Registered User
May 12, 2017
897
1,318
He's value sunk. Albatross contract.

We just have to hope he can play out of it, but I'm not optimistic.

The speed is gone and what's left?
 

Leafsfan74

Registered User
Jul 2, 2018
5,538
5,936
The time to move on was when Petrioangelo was available. I made my plea on here but Leafs as usual kept their core. Handing out NMCs like candy.

An average fan shouldn't be more accurate than an entire scouting and management staff.

Reilly needs a fresh start. Sometimes a player just becomes too complacent after years in the same city and with a secure contract. One can surmise that if it were a UFA year, he'd be playing better and with more focus. He brings passion once in awhile but for a team lacking so much passion, it's only for a fleeting moment.
 
Last edited:

DitchMarner

TheGlitchintheSwitch
Jul 21, 2017
11,344
8,424
Brampton, ON
Sure, by itself plus/minus isn't a great stat, but Rielly's plus/minus this year relative to the numbers of the other defensemen on the team sticks out in a bad way.

1735766268925.png


He's minus eight while the other defensive regulars are plus players. Hopefully he'll have a better second-half than first.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arso40

Stephen

Moderator
Feb 28, 2002
82,209
60,524
Crazy he gets in the foot race given he's behind the net making the pass while Marner and Willy give up on the play

I only watched the highlight and not the full PP sequence, but Rielly (only defenseman out there) setting up in Wayne Gretzky's office behind the net. Marner didn't see to be all there on that play.
 

ACC1224

Super Elite, Passing ALL Tests since 2002
Aug 19, 2002
77,345
44,313
Crazy he gets in the foot race given he's behind the net making the pass while Marner and Willy give up on the play
I think they misjudged the clearing and thought the puck was going down the ice. Brain dead plays by both regardless.
You could see Marner was mad at himself afterwards.
 

BrannigansLaw

Grown Man
Sponsor
Sep 3, 2006
12,763
12,681
Boston, MA
Most likely, Rielly is staying put for the duration of the contract and it's going to be a slog.

If cap space permits I almost wouldn't mind just investing in a higher end number one D and just moving Rielly and his cap hit to LW or something like that. His tunnel vision rushing and remaining speed isn't bad and can be shifted away from a more critical position on the blueline. Alleviate him of the defensive responsibilities he's not really great at handling in the first place.

Team badly needs some talent on the backend. We have too many one dimensional defensive dmen who can’t contribute offensively and struggle to make a good first pass hemming us in our zone.

Jealous of teams with mobile, all around blue liners.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arso40

BraveCanadian

Registered User
Jun 30, 2010
15,608
5,051
He's minus eight while the other defensive regulars are plus players. Hopefully he'll have a better second-half than first.

Did he happen to be out for the -4 the Leafs took with the goalie pulled while on the PP the one game a couple weeks back? Even if he was, still not a good look for Rielly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arso40

Budz

Registered User
Jan 28, 2013
2,298
2,919
He does not fit Berube’s system super well.
I admittedly have never been a huge fan of his, despite him being a great teammate and representative of the Leafs off the ice. We need more of a shooting PP QB, and that is not Morgan.

My wish is that we could move on from him.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 29Potvin

Skullz

Registered User
Jul 5, 2013
732
1,051
Sure, by itself plus/minus isn't a great stat, but Rielly's plus/minus this year relative to the numbers of the other defensemen on the team sticks out in a bad way.

View attachment 954535

He's minus eight while the other defensive regulars are plus players. Hopefully he'll have a better second-half than first.
I think this is partly to do with always being the defencemen for ENG, but he has been very disappointing, I agree.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad