Draft
Registered User
- Jan 23, 2013
- 8,439
- 5,132
That first line would be an absolute disaster defensively. Maybe on the PP it would be interesting, but not at even strength lining up against first or second lines.
GDT: Montreal Canadiens vs. Los Angeles Kings 10/18/17 10:30pm EST RDS, TSN2, NBCSN
- Thread starter donghabs98
- Start date
- Status
That first line would be an absolute disaster defensively. Maybe on the PP it would be interesting, but not at even strength lining up against first or second lines.
BigHabs
#11
- Aug 3, 2009
- 6,778
- 703
I agree, but the defense is already suspect and our scoring is barely there. Something needs to be done to jumpstart the offence. Then if it works maybe tinker a winger on each line maybe. I think Drouin and Galchenyuk could work well setting up goals.
Binary Code
How do I change that
- Jun 24, 2012
- 84,608
- 153,403
Thanks so much. I couldn't find it.
I can't get used to the new tabs, they're meaningless and the search function is not working.
CauZuki
Registered User
- Feb 19, 2008
- 12,341
- 12,175
Yeah, whatever man. There's no point in continuing this conversation.
Man do you understand how dumb this sounds?
You're implying that they're intentionally screwing this kid...
I am not implying, I am outright saying this caveman management has ruined a potentially excellent player. Whether it be from playing him at 18 years old after an iniury the year prior, while consistently moving him around the lineup at the detriment of his chemistry with multiple players. Especially when they stated outright that he wouldn't be playing C after the coach earlier mentioned he would give him a fresh start. It just doesn't make sense when he had recent success at C in 2015-2016 and pre-injury 2016-2017. Why judge him over the 30 games after his injury vs the 100+ beforehand?
Neglect doesn't have to be with intent it can just be blind ignorance.
Last edited:
Draft
Registered User
- Jan 23, 2013
- 8,439
- 5,132
Pacioretty-Danault-Galchenyuk
Lehkonen-Drouin-Gallagher
Byron-Plekanec-Hudon
Mitchell-DeLaRose-Shaw
I think that's what I'd like to see happen. Play Galchenyuk in Radulov's spot, see if Drouin can get Gallagher going and allow Lehkonen to play on his natural side, have a good two-way line, and a solid checking/shut down line.
Lehkonen-Drouin-Gallagher
Byron-Plekanec-Hudon
Mitchell-DeLaRose-Shaw
I think that's what I'd like to see happen. Play Galchenyuk in Radulov's spot, see if Drouin can get Gallagher going and allow Lehkonen to play on his natural side, have a good two-way line, and a solid checking/shut down line.
Lebowski
El Duderino
- Dec 5, 2010
- 17,588
- 5,225
Lebowski
El Duderino
- Dec 5, 2010
- 17,588
- 5,225
I'd go Pacioretty - Danault - Gallagher. Pacioretty doesn't need a passer, he needs hustlers. He can produce with anyone, that's probably his biggest asset at this point.
I think Drouin and Galchenyuk are made to play together. Just like Galchenyuk and Radulov were a great match.
didimentionlarseller
Snipers are a dying bread in the NHL
Habs Icing
Formerly Onice
Phil Parent
Sorel, 'fant d'chienne!
Pacioretty - Drouin - Galchenyuk is a thing tonight per 98,5FM
Byron - Danault - ?
Hemsky - Plekanec - Lehkonen
Gallagher - De La Rose - ?
Didn't catch some names.
Byron - Danault - ?
Hemsky - Plekanec - Lehkonen
Gallagher - De La Rose - ?
Didn't catch some names.
Le Tricolore
Boo! BOOOO!
Well, let's get this started. Maybe I'll get to bed earlier today than yesterday. I'm an idiot, so I assume I'll stay up the whole game.
IcemanTBI
Registered User
Habs Icing
Formerly Onice
Le Tricolore
Boo! BOOOO!
Simarino
Registered User
- Oct 21, 2009
- 3,698
- 3,511
Le Tricolore
Boo! BOOOO!
I like the lines. Hemsky hasn't "earned" a spot on the second, but Pacioretty hasn't earned his spot on the first. Nothing is working now, may as well try this.
- Status
