VanillaCoke
Registered User
- Oct 30, 2013
- 25,943
- 12,602
Is Vancouver trading us their first to take him?Welcome back to Buffalo Tyler Myers
You don't ever want to find yourself in Middlestadt in the middle of the night...It's a bad place after dark....Middlestadt sounds like a city center or downtown... middle of stadt
That is a good point but it comes down to his role on this team, what this team needs and how much he is going to cost to retain.Why are we trading Mitts right as he’s becoming a good player for us? I’d rather trade some of the magic beans in our prospect pool to shore up our D (not Kulich, Savoie, or Levi, but anyone else is fair game)
GET BACK YOU HEATHENS, stay away from my baby boy
I think what the response to your original post was gettig at is that 50-60 points for a bottom 6 player is insanely good and is very seldomly seen. If he is a 50-60 poimt player and is neimg utilized in the bottom 6 (bottom 6 icetime ) … its hard to believe that both are true . True bottom 6 minutes while producing 50-60 points.Yup. He’s in between that 50-60 points this year while getting the 5th most ice time on the team for forwards. But only a minute above rookies Quinn and Peterka who will likely surpass him in ice time next year (putting Mitts in the bottom six forwards for ice time). This will hurt his points a little bit, but I expect better line mates and some growth and he’ll still be in that 50-60 point range.
I have a baby boy from multiple different mothers. One on the big club, one signed to a contract but not on the big club and one not signed to a dealI thought Huglen was your baby boy?
He's fine defensively. The entire team sucks in their own end. You would trade a core piece because you're worried his agent will want him to be paid fairly? With so much other capital? A notion that has gotten more moldy as the season has progressed. Really man, some of the worst logic I've seen around here.That is a good point but it comes down to his role on this team, what this team needs and how much he is going to cost to retain.
He plays mostly on the 3rd line but is capable of being a 2nd line center which I am sure his agent knows and will ask for that going rate after next season.
This team needs to get better defensively and defense is not his strong suit.
Trading him now for defensive help fills a need and allows a spot for one of our glut of forward prospects.
Regarding the #4, I think the thought for most Sabres fans is we have 2 glaring holes, goalie and #2 RHD. We have way too many valuable assets that aren’t being spent wisely if we don’t spend it on a top tier RHD. Too many young kids with potential that will need a shot as forwards and Dahlin Samuelsson Power locked in long term in D. Just getting someone serviceable in that role would be a waste.Everyone says they want a #4 Dman, and when they are offered one, they say, "oh, he's not good enough."
That's what a #4 is. He is in the bottom half of all Dmen in the league. He will have flaws, maybe big ones, but will be able to play 18-20 minutes/night regardless.
If i was the Sabres I wouldn't trade Mittelstadt for anything less than a really good #4 on a good contract. Middleton has been mentioned...he might be just about perfect... defensively minded, tough, 2M and change AAV. I don't think he will be traded, but maybe a player like him?
In general, though, I wouldn't be in a hurry to trade CM until the young prospects prove that they are good enough to take his place. Sabres cannot screw around for another year and not make the playoffs. They would be better off trading one of their prospects and a pick, IMO.
An alternative would be to simply overpay for a UFA Dman on a short term deal, and hope that the rest of the D mature in the meantime, and maybe someone like Johnson is ready in a year or two.
Keep Mittlestadt. If he reverts to meh next year then you don't re-sign him.
You have cap space, right? Just give Dumba a 3 year, 18M contract. That's an overpay, IMO, but you are doing it so he will go away after three years. Not the offensive force that he was a few years ago, but he can still really skate, is tough, and has some puck moving skill. Makes some mistakes, but makes up for it with his athleticism, usually. More of a 3D than a 4D....not a plodder.Regarding the #4, I think the thought for most Sabres fans is we have 2 glaring holes, goalie and #2 RHD. We have way too many valuable assets that aren’t being spent wisely if we don’t spend it on a top tier RHD. Too many young kids with potential that will need a shot as forwards and Dahlin Samuelsson Power locked in long term in D. Just getting someone serviceable in that role would be a waste.
He's fine defensively. The entire team sucks in their own end. You would trade a core piece because you're worried his agent will want him to be paid fairly? With so much other capital? A notion that has gotten more moldy as the season has progressed. Really man, some of the worst logic I've seen around here.
GET BACK YOU HEATHENS, stay away from my baby boy
Judging by your font, you are indeed not sure what "fine" means.I am not sure what you mean by “fine”? Not worst on the team? Because he is not good defensively.
Simple HF posters may not think about his next contract but I guarantee you Adams is and rightfully so.
It's full size lolI have this image of you swinging around a Kevin Sundher autographed mini stick as you fend off potential claimants. It makes me chuckle.
he is pretty good defensively what a terrible take playing with Olofsson for most of the season tanked his +/- a stat that tells you nothing.I am not sure what you mean by “fine”? Not worst on the team? Because he is not good defensively.
Simple HF posters may not think about his next contract but I guarantee you Adams is and rightfully so.
If he was “pretty good” defensively you’d think our coaching staff would recognize that and put him on the PK as we’ve had historically bad penalty kill all season.he is pretty good defensively what a terrible take playing with Olofsson for most of the season tanked his +/- a stat that tells you nothing.