Antropovsky
Registered User
- Jun 2, 2007
- 15,994
- 7,832
What teams would realistically afford Marner and he would make sense on their roster?
He's barely a 100 point player while playing with a top 3 center in this league. He would be wise to agree to a sign and trade and secure an 8 year contract for 12 million. Then he basically has an entire career of being paid like an elite player, all thanks to playing with two of the absolute top centers of their eras in their primes. Had he went to Phoenix instead, I bet he has earnngs similar to Ehlers.How's he going to do that when we don't play him on Matthews line at all. Who is going to score the 69 goals for him?
This thread now has an official theme song:
We xertainly dont want Dubois. Dubois is a player with questionable passion from what ive read anyhow (havent minded his willingness to play dirty vs Toronto though myself).Marner and Tavares for Dubois (2.5m retained), Doughty, and Clarke. Who says no?
I know, I know, Dubois sucks. It's true. But he might not suck THAT bad for 6 mil.
The real get here is Clarke, but we definitely overhaul the D and our identity in one fell swoop.
LA gets off the Dubois mistake (mostly) and swap three years x 11 mil of Doughty for one year x 11 mil of Tavares. They also get a superstar to play with Byfield.
Domi-Matthews-(Cowan or FA)
Knies-Dubois-Nylander
McMann-(Minten?)-Jarnkrok
Dewar-Kampf-Reaves
Rielly-Doughty
McCabe-(Roy?)
Benoit-Clarke
Robertson and Liljegren can be traded for picks or futures
Obviously a trade of that magnitude would never happen, but I don't hate it.
From LA, Kempe. No to Dubois.We certainly don't want Dubois...
He's barely a 100 point player while playing with a top 3 center in this league. He would be wise to agree to a sign and trade and secure an 8 year contract for 12 million. Then he basically has an entire career of being paid like an elite player, all thanks to playing with two of the absolute top centers of their eras in their primes. Had he went to Phoenix instead, I bet he has earnngs similar to Ehlers.
Not all God's are loved.Mitch just said the fans in Toronto view the Leaf players as Gods lol.
Bringing Mitch back is the literal definition of insanityHe has literally milked the Leafs franchise for as much as he could while giving little back in the playoffs...there is no other franchise where he makes this kind of money and receives all these endorsements for the type of player he is.
He's not waiving for Utah.
It's all in the players hands. You can guess however you want and sure its fun BUT the players will decide when and where they want to play. Speaking of the whipping boy Marner.
I hope we are done with the Marner god angle. He was only saying that it is very tough when the fans put you on a pedestal and you fail to live up to their expectations. As much as I am disappointed by his playoff performance, the abuse he has taken for that comment is unwarranted.
I hope we are done with the Marner god angle. He was only saying that it is very tough when the fans put you on a pedestal and you fail to live up to their expectations. As much as I am disappointed by his playoff performance, the abuse he has taken for that comment is unwarranted.
Bringing Mitch back is the literal definition of insanity
He'll have the audacity after that interview to ask for a raise after an already-gaudy $11 mill AAV price tag.
If he really wanted to be here and win .. he'd take it down a notch on his next deal. Take a 2 year deal at $8 mill Mitch, show your worth when it counts, and cash in on your next deal. At 27, a short deal could prime himself for a 7-8 year deal into his mid-30's.
But in all seriousness, he needs a change of scenery. Likely lights it up somewhere else, because we're the Leafs and we're cursed.