Antropovsky said:
Haha how wrong I was about his playoff stats?
You first cherry picked goals to downplay a playmaker, after a game you admitted you barely watched, where Marner played well. Worse, you then focused in on primary assist generation in an attempt to continue to discredit Marner (one of the best primary assist generators in the league), and in doing so, made a completely false statement about his primary assists. When I pointed out to you that your statement was incorrect, you decided to deny the facts, double down, and throw around false accusations. You then had multiple people correct you, and I linked you to the NHL.com page to prove you were wrong. No response from you.
I said he had one primary assist but he had two? OMG what a catastrophic mistake...
It's not a "mistake" when you repeatedly refuse to accept the facts. He did have two primary assists this series (now 3), though your statement was even more wrong than that. You falsely claimed he had 1 primary assist in his "previous 8 postseason points". In his previous 8 postseason points, he actually had 4 primary assists. Even if you had meant his previous 8
games instead of points, he had 3. Catastrophic or not, it's good to admit when you were wrong, especially after being so hostile to those who are sharing the actual truth.
My takes are bad but yours are better?
Now we're getting somewhere. My takes are at least supported.
... I watched enough of the games to come to a decision that Marner was not playing good enough.
You watched bits and pieces of games with a heavily biased eye, ignored the data and statistics, and even ignored the overwhelming opinion of the broadcasters you yourself referenced. Clearly you did not watch enough, as you arrived at the wrong conclusion, and didn't know simple things like how many primary assists he's had.
Looks like many people agree with my "take".
Actually, they made their own statements separate from yours, and this is a fan board on the internet after a playoff loss, so rational reactions aren't exactly abundant. Pointing at others doesn't change the fact that you were wrong.
I have to ask how much of the games are you watching because you were saying Marner has been the Leafs "best player"?
1. I have watched every single second of every single game.
2. I didn't say Marner has been the Leaf's "best player" at all. Do not misrepresent me and the things I have said.
Can't say that I'm surprised that when a bunch of posters entered into this thread saying Marner hasn't been good enough you put your tail between your legs..yet you were in full attack mode when there were just a couple.
What are you even talking about? First off, I haven't attacked anybody. Second, I didn't go anywhere - still here replying the whole time. I'm not going to start a discussion with every single person who makes a comment, especially when I have already had discussions with many of those individuals you are referencing many times in the past. It's after a playoff loss, and I understand that people are venting.
That's not the same as what you did. You have been doing this for years, and were doing it in this thread after playoff wins, and games where Marner played well. You were tagging people and making snarky comments. You were posting misleading or flat-out incorrect statistics and statements, while ignoring the facts that were being presented to you. You were being incredibly hostile towards others, and throwing around false accusations. You were doing all of this while not even watching the majority of games, by your own admission.
Other people being wrong does not justify what you did.