Player Discussion Mitch Marner, Continued

Divine

Registered User
Dec 18, 2010
19,256
13,478
He had a career high of 30 goals when he got that contract. 40 goals did not factor into that contract. And you were given quite a few examples of players that never hit 40.

He won the Hart, eh? Sounds like hockey people don't dismiss playmaking like you're trying to.

Who said hockey people dismiss playmaking?

If Marner wins the Hart or Art Ross, he’d be asking for 15M.

Is Marner a good player? Yes.
Is he worth 12M? No.
Is saying he’s not a 12M dollar player dismissing all passers in the league? No.

Stop the strawman.
 
  • Like
Reactions: myleafs

lipstickjunkie

Registered User
Jan 5, 2017
649
779
Laughable, absolutely laughable analysis. I honestly don't know how you keep going when literally everyone else is applauding his performance. Even those who don't want to re-sign him are acknowledging how well he's playing right now.
Guys, Antroputz is right. Marner had zero impact on that McMann goal. Not only that, but he had nothing to do with the overtime winner, either.
 

leafs in five

Registered User
Feb 4, 2007
5,279
1,045
engelland
imo Berube should send him out as a lone forward every once in a while even if we're supposed to be even strength, force him be the play driver. my prediction (backed up by some of the data posted itt) is that he would struggle to drive play in this scenario. which is pretty damning really
 
  • Like
Reactions: francis246

Dekes For Days

Registered User
Sep 24, 2018
21,341
16,023
Who said hockey people dismiss playmaking?
You did, when you pretended that players need to hit some arbitrary goal mark to get paid, despite a long history of that not being true.
Is Marner a good player?
Yes, obviously.
Is he worth 12M?
Yes, obviously.
Is saying he’s not a 12M dollar player dismissing all passers in the league?
No, but your multiple posts dismissing playmaking impacts to overemphasize goals and create weird goal-related criteria and imaginary cap limits for playmakers is very dismissive of playmaking.
 

ZEBROA

Registered User
Dec 21, 2017
3,853
2,418
You did, when you pretended that players need to hit some arbitrary goal mark to get paid, despite a long history of that not being true.

Yes, obviously.

Yes, obviously.

No, but your multiple posts dismissing playmaking impacts to overemphasize goals and create weird goal-related criteria and imaginary cap limits for playmakers is very dismissive of playmaking.
Why will Matthews get more pesos then Marner is it
A his playmaking ability
B His shoting ability.
C His overall ability.

I would guess B. And C... being a center that is. If they are somewhat equal on D etc. It must be the sniper skills that get u the extra money.

Only good at sniping or playmaking and not D, is another topic.
 

Divine

Registered User
Dec 18, 2010
19,256
13,478
You did, when you pretended that players need to hit some arbitrary goal mark to get paid, despite a long history of that not being true.

Yes, obviously.

Yes, obviously.

No, but your multiple posts dismissing playmaking impacts to overemphasize goals and create weird goal-related criteria and imaginary cap limits for playmakers is very dismissive of playmaking.

That’s because he’s not a 12M dollar player. He can’t score at a high enough rate. He needs other players to score for him. I would prefer a player who can generate himself.. as would most.
 

Dekes For Days

Registered User
Sep 24, 2018
21,341
16,023
Why will Matthews get more pesos then Marner
We don't know what Marner will get, but it's going to come down to his relative quality and overall impact, not his playstyle.
That’s because he’s not a 12M dollar player.
He is though. There's really no argument otherwise. There is no goal total or playstyle criteria to be paid like that. Playmaking is valuable, whether you want to admit it or not, and plenty of playmakers have made the equivalent and more without hitting 40 goals.
I would prefer a player who can generate himself.
He does generate himself. There's more to generating goals than who last touched the puck.
 

thusk

Registered User
Jul 15, 2011
4,466
2,338
Chicoutimi
That’s because he’s not a 12M dollar player. He can’t score at a high enough rate. He needs other players to score for him. I would prefer a player who can generate himself.. as would most.

You know Marner since hes in the NHal producing goal at the same rate g/game than Stone, Larkin, Meier, miller, hyman, pavelski,

higher rate than Svechnikov, strutzle, keller, konecny, oreilly, kopitar, hischier, gaudreau
 

Divine

Registered User
Dec 18, 2010
19,256
13,478
You know Marner since hes in the NHal producing goal at the same rate g/game than Stone, Larkin, Meier, miller, hyman, pavelski,

higher rate than Svechnikov, strutzle, keller, konecny, oreilly, kopitar, hischier, gaudreau

Great - can we get him at the cap hit as one of those players too?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nineteen67

GoonieFace

Registered User
Jun 24, 2013
7,972
8,256
The Matrix
Just going to throw some 5v5 stats from this year.

I’ve heard a lot of Marner is carrying this team and AINEC

Goals - 2 193rd
Points - 9 60th
Primary assists - 3 93rd
Takeaways - 9 30th
XG/60 - .59 288th
Points per 60 - 1.99 127th
SOG/60 - 5.96 256th
Created x Goals - 1.8 241st
Assists/60 - 1.55 68th
 
  • Like
Reactions: ToneDog

thewave

Registered User
Jun 17, 2011
42,050
12,460
Just going to throw some 5v5 stats from this year.

I’ve heard a lot of Marner is carrying this team and AINEC

Goals - 2 193rd
Points - 9 60th
Primary assists - 3 93rd
Takeaways - 9 30th
XG/60 - .59 288th
Points per 60 - 1.99 127th
SOG/60 - 5.96 256th
Created x Goals - 1.8 241st
Assists/60 - 1.55 68th

Ya he is way down the list. Nylander is bagging his lunch or something like that.
 

Mess

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
87,815
13,485
Leafs Home Board
PLAYOFFS

Nate MacKinnon an elite #1C makes $12.6 mil AAV which is similar to what Mitch Marner is seeking.

In the past 8 seasons Nate is #1 in playoff goals scored with 46 goals and points at 1.28 P/GP.

1731944360077.png


Mitch Marner career playoff GOAL results in direct comparison and others that score at similar rates..

1731944992022.png


Which player MacKinnon or Marner would you rather be paying $12.6 mil AAV based on being a TRUE playoff performer?

Only a select few Leaf Fans believe the Leafs are getting similar Return on Investment that they would pay Marner what MacKinnon makes.
 

francis246

Registered User
Nov 16, 2007
14,537
17,991
One SOG 5v5 since Matty went on IR.

5 and 1 record, since Matty went on IR and leads the team in scoring.

Just gonna leave this here so you understand no cares if he has one SOG on 5v5. It’s not affecting the overall outcomes of the games. It’s just something being thrown out there to distract and diminish what he has been doing well. Grasping at straws.

PLAYOFFS

Nate MacKinnon an elite #1C makes $12.6 mil AAV which is similar to what Mitch Marner is seeking.

In the past 8 seasons Nate is #1 in playoff goals scored with 46 goals and points at 1.28 P/GP.

View attachment 932198

Mitch Marner career playoff GOAL results in direct comparison and others that score at similar rates..

View attachment 932201

Which player MacKinnon or Marner would you rather be paying $12.6 mil AAV based on being a TRUE playoff performer?

No one here knows what Marner is asking. His agent hasn’t leaked anything and the team hasn’t leaked anything. This is just more speculative nonsense.
 

Antropovsky

Registered User
Jun 2, 2007
15,433
7,148
5 and 1 record, since Matty went on IR and leads the team in scoring.

Just gonna leave this here so you understand no cares if he has one SOG on 5v5. It’s not affecting the overall outcomes of the games. It’s just something being thrown out there to distract and diminish what he has been doing well. Grasping at straws.



No one here knows what Marner is asking. His agent hasn’t leaked anything and the team hasn’t leaked anything. This is just more speculative nonsense.
@ToneDog dont listen to this poster. The only people who dont care are the Marner Only Fans.

1 5v5 shot in 6 games is abysmal.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

  • HV 71 @ Lulea Hockey
    HV 71 @ Lulea Hockey
    Wagers: 5
    Staked: $613.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Croatia vs Portugal
    Croatia vs Portugal
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $150.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Luxembourg vs Northern Ireland
    Luxembourg vs Northern Ireland
    Wagers: 6
    Staked: $52,170.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Poland vs Scotland
    Poland vs Scotland
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $150.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Serbia vs Denmark
    Serbia vs Denmark
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $155.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad