Miscellaneous NHL Discussion XC: Stoppage Time Not Required

Status
Not open for further replies.

LegionOfDoom91

Registered User
Jan 25, 2013
83,359
143,384
Philadelphia, PA


does this mean we can bring back rivalry night?


They should have never got rid of the baseball like style schedules to begin with.

It never really made sense to me. You did this essentially for the big market Eastern based teams to go out west to play each team once. Was that one night of potentially boosted ticket sales really worth it? Especially when chopping off games of eastern vs. eastern based to do so?

Like the Flyers went from playing the Rangers, Pens, etc. 6 times a year. The Bruins, Habs, Maple Leafs, etc. 4 times a year. All to playing these teams like anywhere from 2-4 times year now & filling those dates with more games against like the Ducks, Coyotes, Kraken, Kings, etc.

I get it sucks if you’re a fan of an eastern based team out in the western part of the continent you might end up not seeing a team live for years with that style of scheduling. But is it really worth it business wise to cater that?
 

FlyerNutter

In the forest, a man learns what it means to live
Jun 22, 2018
12,919
29,401
Winnipeg
They should have never got rid of the baseball like style schedules to begin with.

It never really made sense to me. You did this essentially for the big market Eastern based teams to go out west to play each team once. Was that one night of potentially boosted ticket sales really worth it? Especially when chopping off games of eastern vs. eastern based to do so?

Like the Flyers went from playing the Rangers, Pens, etc. 6 times a year. The Bruins, Habs, Maple Leafs, etc. 4 times a year. All to playing these teams like anywhere from 2-4 times year now & filling those dates with more games against like the Ducks, Coyotes, Kraken, Kings, etc.

I get it sucks if you’re a fan of an eastern based team out in the western part of the continent you might end up not seeing a team live for years with that style of scheduling. But is it really worth it business wise to cater that?

Yes
 

VladDrag

Registered User
Feb 6, 2018
6,341
16,156
Reaves looked to be aiming for the chest but that's hard to hit first when the guy you're hitting is leaning forward and also not paying any attention at all.

I loathe blaming the guy getting hit, but Hronek almost hit himself on that play. There is no way it's a good idea to skate into the NZ while looking behind you.
I tend to agree for the most part. I don't think it's worth a suspension. I think hockey is too fast a sport to believe that you're going to remove all head contact. And Hronek was almost as responsible as Reaves.

With that being said, I do think that any head contact needs to be penalized. Concussions are so dangerous and have life altering damages. I think a minimum two minute penalty for this play is reasonable...More reasonable than a 4 min double minor for arbitrary bleeding from a high stick.
 

CanadianFlyer88

Knublin' PPs
Feb 12, 2004
44,017
53,572
Van City
I get it sucks if you’re a fan of an eastern based team out in the western part of the continent you might end up not seeing a team live for years with that style of scheduling. But is it really worth it business wise to cater that?
I'd obviously like to see the Flyers every year out here, but the biggest issue, IMO, is not having stars come through every year with the old schedule.

McDavid (for example) in Philly every three years isn't the way to promote your stars.
 

LegionOfDoom91

Registered User
Jan 25, 2013
83,359
143,384
Philadelphia, PA
I'd obviously like to see the Flyers every year out here, but the biggest issue, IMO, is not having stars come through every year with the old schedule.

McDavid (for example) in Philly every three years isn't the way to promote your stars.

Obviously the Flyers are horrible currently so that’s the main overriding issue but I don’t think McDavid was as a big of a draw when he came to Philadelphia over their eastern team counterparts. Like the highest re-sale prices here are generally the Penguins, Rangers, Capitals, Bruins, Maple Leafs, Canadiens, etc.

I don’t think the NHL is great by any means but when it comes to the US market it’s weighing the pros & cons amongst an ultimately niche audience. McDavid is with a team that ultimately no one really cares about in the US with Edmonton. The big eastern market vs. eastern market probably draws them more money than that. But when you add a star like Crosby to a Philadelphia-New York-Washington vs. Pittsburgh matchup that’s the most profitable in the US.

Essentially hockey in the US is very niche & regional based. You want to grow the game but at the same time you don’t want to get away from your bread & butter. You have to find a line to straddle that makes everything work.
 
Last edited:

Magua

Entirely Palatable Product
Apr 25, 2016
38,648
160,975
Huron of the Lakes



uDokv0Cs_400x400.jpg
 

Captain Dave Poulin

Imaginary Cat
Sponsor
Apr 30, 2015
68,591
201,338
Tokyo, JP
They should have never got rid of the baseball like style schedules to begin with.

It never really made sense to me. You did this essentially for the big market Eastern based teams to go out west to play each team once. Was that one night of potentially boosted ticket sales really worth it? Especially when chopping off games of eastern vs. eastern based to do so?

Like the Flyers went from playing the Rangers, Pens, etc. 6 times a year. The Bruins, Habs, Maple Leafs, etc. 4 times a year. All to playing these teams like anywhere from 2-4 times year now & filling those dates with more games against like the Ducks, Coyotes, Kraken, Kings, etc.

I get it sucks if you’re a fan of an eastern based team out in the western part of the continent you might end up not seeing a team live for years with that style of scheduling. But is it really worth it business wise to cater that?

It blows my mind that anyone would want to see MORE games against the f***ing Islanders, the f***ing Devils, the f***ing Rangers, and the f***ing Penguins. It makes no sense to me.

Reaves looked to be aiming for the chest but that's hard to hit first when the guy you're hitting is leaning forward and also not paying any attention at all.

I loathe blaming the guy getting hit, but Hronek almost hit himself on that play. There is no way it's a good idea to skate into the NZ while looking behind you.

 

LegionOfDoom91

Registered User
Jan 25, 2013
83,359
143,384
Philadelphia, PA
It blows my mind that anyone would want to see MORE games against the f***ing Islanders, the f***ing Devils, the f***ing Rangers, and the f***ing Penguins. It makes no sense to me.

@Hollywood Cannon & other STH that sells some of their tickets are probably hoping it comes to fruition. Those teams are where you make your money. Not just for fans of the Flyers but a lot of out town fans of those teams.

I haven’t been to a game in like 5+ years. So it was before they went completely to shit. The fanbase was still at least moderately interested in the Flyers. But I went to games against the Maple Leafs & Canadiens. There had to be at least 25% or more of the building in those two team’s apparel. It’s always been that way with like the Rangers, Pens, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Captain Dave Poulin

Cody Webster

Registered User
Jul 18, 2014
26,311
24,793
NHL feel bad for buffalo and just letting them start the game up 1-0?
Screenshot_20221215-212059.png




does this mean we can bring back rivalry night?

Unfortunately, I guess this means the playoff format is never going to change back to what it used to be



does this mean we can bring back rivalry night?

Unfortunately, I guess this means the playoff format is never going to change back to what it used to be
 

Hollywood Cannon

I'm Away From My Desk
Jul 17, 2007
88,248
160,495
South Jersey
@Hollywood Cannon & other STH that sells some of their tickets are probably hoping it comes to fruition. Those teams are where you make your money. Not just for fans of the Flyers but a lot of out town fans of those teams.

I haven’t been to a game in like 5+ years. So it was before they went completely to shit. The fanbase was still at least moderately interested in the Flyers. But I went to games against the Maple Leafs & Canadiens. There had to be at least 25% or more of the building in those two team’s apparel. It’s always been that way with like the Rangers, Pens, etc.
With where the team currently is i'd prefer for the WC teams to come here every year. Seeing those teams are the only reason that i'm going to any games this year.

With that said though, the fact that the Pittsburgh Penguins only come to Philadelphia once this year and it was on Black Friday is a god damn disgrace but a team like the Sabres are coming twice. There has to be a way for the NHL to have their cake and eat it too if they switch the divisions around a little bit more. There's no reason that they should be playing teams from the other EC division more than the ones in their own division.

As it stands currently the Rangers games have a pretty good resale market and then weekend games are your only hope of making any money back. The rest? Woooooooof unless you're creative with how you move them. If they're going to be bad though it's probably better to have more games against local teams because they may have fans that will travel to Philly. I suspect the Rangers fans come here because it's cheaper then MSG.
 

Ironmanrulez

#nEvErrEbUiLd #nEvErpLaYyOuTh #nEverpLaYsKiLL
Jul 1, 2010
3,502
5,184
Cologne, Germany
Obviously the Flyers are horrible currently so that’s the main overriding issue but I don’t think McDavid was as a big of a draw when he came to Philadelphia over their eastern team counterparts. Like the highest re-sale prices here are generally the Penguins, Rangers, Capitals, Bruins, Maple Leafs, Canadiens, etc.

I don’t think the NHL is great by any means but when it comes to the US market it’s weighing the pros & cons amongst an ultimately niche audience. McDavid is with a team that ultimately no one really cares about in the US with Edmonton. The big eastern market vs. eastern market probably draws them more money than that. But when you add a star like Crosby to a Philadelphia-New York-Washington vs. Pittsburgh matchup that’s the most profitable in the US.

Essentially hockey in the US is very niche & regional based. You want to grow the game but at the same time you don’t want to get away from your bread & butter. You have to find a line to straddle that makes everything work.
Philly needs a Superstar for hockey to grow. BEDARD TO PHILLY FOR HOCKEY! Commissioner make it happen!
 
Last edited:

CanadianFlyer88

Knublin' PPs
Feb 12, 2004
44,017
53,572
Van City
Obviously the Flyers are horrible currently so that’s the main overriding issue but I don’t think McDavid was as a big of a draw when he came to Philadelphia over their eastern team counterparts. Like the highest re-sale prices here are generally the Penguins, Rangers, Capitals, Bruins, Maple Leafs, Canadiens, etc.

I don’t think the NHL is great by any means but when it comes to the US market it’s weighing the pros & cons amongst an ultimately niche audience. McDavid is with a team that ultimately no one really cares about in the US with Edmonton. The big eastern market vs. eastern market probably draws them more money than that. But when you add a star like Crosby to a Philadelphia-New York-Washington vs. Pittsburgh matchup that’s the most profitable in the US.

Essentially hockey in the US is very niche & regional based. You want to grow the game but at the same time you don’t want to get away from your bread & butter. You have to find a line to straddle that makes everything work.
Philly happens to be in the geographical region with the longest serving fan bases, and also happens to be accessible by car, train, or short plane ride for many other NHL cities with these longstanding fan bases. Plus, the Metro has two generational players amongst a plethora or recent top 3 draft picks, so there are draws for "local" opponents. It won't always be this way; I bet the Caps and Pens start to become after thoughts without Crosby and Ovechkin, barring another generational kid ending up there... they'll fit in well with the Flyers. :laugh:

McDavid was just one example, but say he played for Chicago, or another prominent western conference hockey market. Under the old model, he'd still only make it to Philly every three years. Not that there is a direct correlation, but the NHL has always lagged behind the other sports in making household names out of its stars. They've really only ever had one guy transcend the sport: Gretzky. That's shameful.

The two newest franchises are already massive draws in their cities. It would be disappointing if those cities only got looks at Matthews, Crosby, Hughes, Tage Thompson ( :naughty: ), etc. every three years.

The MLB saw the value in getting all teams to all ballparks. It was always a huge deal when Jordan came to the PNW. It's obviously not possible for NFL teams to play everyone else each season... But, I'm all for hockey keeping to a schedule that allows for kids to see the top players in person more than every three years. :laugh:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad