landsbergfan
Registered User
- Jun 20, 2018
- 6,813
- 24,262
does this mean we can bring back rivalry night?
does this mean we can bring back rivalry night?
does this mean we can bring back rivalry night?
They're their own rivals.shame this Org. just a joke... not a true rival for anyone.
just easy points
They should have never got rid of the baseball like style schedules to begin with.
It never really made sense to me. You did this essentially for the big market Eastern based teams to go out west to play each team once. Was that one night of potentially boosted ticket sales really worth it? Especially when chopping off games of eastern vs. eastern based to do so?
Like the Flyers went from playing the Rangers, Pens, etc. 6 times a year. The Bruins, Habs, Maple Leafs, etc. 4 times a year. All to playing these teams like anywhere from 2-4 times year now & filling those dates with more games against like the Ducks, Coyotes, Kraken, Kings, etc.
I get it sucks if you’re a fan of an eastern based team out in the western part of the continent you might end up not seeing a team live for years with that style of scheduling. But is it really worth it business wise to cater that?
I tend to agree for the most part. I don't think it's worth a suspension. I think hockey is too fast a sport to believe that you're going to remove all head contact. And Hronek was almost as responsible as Reaves.Reaves looked to be aiming for the chest but that's hard to hit first when the guy you're hitting is leaning forward and also not paying any attention at all.
I loathe blaming the guy getting hit, but Hronek almost hit himself on that play. There is no way it's a good idea to skate into the NZ while looking behind you.
I'd obviously like to see the Flyers every year out here, but the biggest issue, IMO, is not having stars come through every year with the old schedule.I get it sucks if you’re a fan of an eastern based team out in the western part of the continent you might end up not seeing a team live for years with that style of scheduling. But is it really worth it business wise to cater that?
I'd obviously like to see the Flyers every year out here, but the biggest issue, IMO, is not having stars come through every year with the old schedule.
McDavid (for example) in Philly every three years isn't the way to promote your stars.
They should have never got rid of the baseball like style schedules to begin with.
It never really made sense to me. You did this essentially for the big market Eastern based teams to go out west to play each team once. Was that one night of potentially boosted ticket sales really worth it? Especially when chopping off games of eastern vs. eastern based to do so?
Like the Flyers went from playing the Rangers, Pens, etc. 6 times a year. The Bruins, Habs, Maple Leafs, etc. 4 times a year. All to playing these teams like anywhere from 2-4 times year now & filling those dates with more games against like the Ducks, Coyotes, Kraken, Kings, etc.
I get it sucks if you’re a fan of an eastern based team out in the western part of the continent you might end up not seeing a team live for years with that style of scheduling. But is it really worth it business wise to cater that?
Reaves looked to be aiming for the chest but that's hard to hit first when the guy you're hitting is leaning forward and also not paying any attention at all.
I loathe blaming the guy getting hit, but Hronek almost hit himself on that play. There is no way it's a good idea to skate into the NZ while looking behind you.
It blows my mind that anyone would want to see MORE games against the f***ing Islanders, the f***ing Devils, the f***ing Rangers, and the f***ing Penguins. It makes no sense to me.
I hated when we played NJ and Carolina 8 times per season.I'm in the minority but I vastly prefer the varied schedule. It probably stems from following the lower travel budget AHL and being subjected to 12-14 games a year each against Wilkes Barre and Lehigh Valley, which is boring as ****.
does this mean we can bring back rivalry night?
does this mean we can bring back rivalry night?
With where the team currently is i'd prefer for the WC teams to come here every year. Seeing those teams are the only reason that i'm going to any games this year.@Hollywood Cannon & other STH that sells some of their tickets are probably hoping it comes to fruition. Those teams are where you make your money. Not just for fans of the Flyers but a lot of out town fans of those teams.
I haven’t been to a game in like 5+ years. So it was before they went completely to shit. The fanbase was still at least moderately interested in the Flyers. But I went to games against the Maple Leafs & Canadiens. There had to be at least 25% or more of the building in those two team’s apparel. It’s always been that way with like the Rangers, Pens, etc.
Philly needs a Superstar for hockey to grow. BEDARD TO PHILLY FOR HOCKEY! Commissioner make it happen!Obviously the Flyers are horrible currently so that’s the main overriding issue but I don’t think McDavid was as a big of a draw when he came to Philadelphia over their eastern team counterparts. Like the highest re-sale prices here are generally the Penguins, Rangers, Capitals, Bruins, Maple Leafs, Canadiens, etc.
I don’t think the NHL is great by any means but when it comes to the US market it’s weighing the pros & cons amongst an ultimately niche audience. McDavid is with a team that ultimately no one really cares about in the US with Edmonton. The big eastern market vs. eastern market probably draws them more money than that. But when you add a star like Crosby to a Philadelphia-New York-Washington vs. Pittsburgh matchup that’s the most profitable in the US.
Essentially hockey in the US is very niche & regional based. You want to grow the game but at the same time you don’t want to get away from your bread & butter. You have to find a line to straddle that makes everything work.
Philly needs a Superstar for hockey to grow. BEDARD TO PHILLY FOR HOCKEY! Commissioner male it happen!
Ghost doesn’t have 60 points…60 pts in 31 games for the greatest to ever do it. Imagine the mental gymnastics required to not give him MVP this season lol
Philly happens to be in the geographical region with the longest serving fan bases, and also happens to be accessible by car, train, or short plane ride for many other NHL cities with these longstanding fan bases. Plus, the Metro has two generational players amongst a plethora or recent top 3 draft picks, so there are draws for "local" opponents. It won't always be this way; I bet the Caps and Pens start to become after thoughts without Crosby and Ovechkin, barring another generational kid ending up there... they'll fit in well with the Flyers.Obviously the Flyers are horrible currently so that’s the main overriding issue but I don’t think McDavid was as a big of a draw when he came to Philadelphia over their eastern team counterparts. Like the highest re-sale prices here are generally the Penguins, Rangers, Capitals, Bruins, Maple Leafs, Canadiens, etc.
I don’t think the NHL is great by any means but when it comes to the US market it’s weighing the pros & cons amongst an ultimately niche audience. McDavid is with a team that ultimately no one really cares about in the US with Edmonton. The big eastern market vs. eastern market probably draws them more money than that. But when you add a star like Crosby to a Philadelphia-New York-Washington vs. Pittsburgh matchup that’s the most profitable in the US.
Essentially hockey in the US is very niche & regional based. You want to grow the game but at the same time you don’t want to get away from your bread & butter. You have to find a line to straddle that makes everything work.