freakydallas13
Registered User
We can't give you a list until we agree what you mean when you say "tanking".In the last ten years, which SC Winners were the product of "tanking."
We can't give you a list until we agree what you mean when you say "tanking".In the last ten years, which SC Winners were the product of "tanking."
Washington? Florida? Having one top player from a high pick (Ovechkin, Barkov) does not a tank make.Last 10 years? TB, Pitt, Colorado, Washington, Florida all come to mind. The Blues and Vegas featured prominent tank-acquired players other teams gave up on.
Which winning teams in the last 35 years have featured zero players drafted in the tank areas of the draft?
Washington? Florida? Having one top player from a high pick (Ovechkin, Barkov) does not a tank make.
Ekblad may have been #1, but he's a run of the mill top 4 D-man, in ten years, highest Norris vote was #6.
Basically, TB, Pitt, and Colorado. TB had only Hedman for one Cup (with Stamkos injured).
So basically you're saying if Michkov turns out to be an elite forward, that's all we need out of a tank?
See, this is why I asked. You ask for a list of teams that tanked and won, then use your own definition of "tanked" to arbitrarily exclude valid answers.Washington? Florida? Having one top player from a high pick (Ovechkin, Barkov) does not a tank make.
Ekblad may have been #1, but he's a run of the mill top 4 D-man, in ten years, highest Norris vote was #6.
Basically, TB, Pitt, and Colorado. TB had only Hedman for one Cup (with Stamkos injured).
So basically you're saying if Michkov turns out to be an elite forward, that's all we need out of a tank?