Cody Webster
Registered User
- Jul 18, 2014
- 26,594
- 25,222
he tried to gamble on himself in contract negotiations and GMs hate thatAre they preparing for an appeal? How can they not say what he gambled on?
Are they preparing for an appeal? How can they not say what he gambled on?
This shit is weird. He supposedly didn't bet on NHL games and to my knowledge NHL players are allowed to bet on other sports. So what is it?
It sounds like the NHL has some third party keep track of the accounts, the third party group noticed some suspicious activity on his United States based account and they then alerted the NHLMaybe they know he did it and he admitted it, but they just don't have any physical (electronic?) proof?
The way Ottawa is imploding, welcome home G for the SC run when Michkov comes over.Wait, Peter Chiarelli could be next GM of Ottawa?
Giroux can't catch a break
Sens, zero cap room, Korpisalo and Forsberg in goal, Chabot injured, Brannstrom injured, Norris with questionable shoulder.Sens imploding: 6 pts
Flyers playing great: 9pts
Yeah they should have foreseen these injuries and Pinto gambling, 2 years ago. DummiesSens, zero cap room, Korpisalo and Forsberg in goal, Chabot injured, Brannstrom injured, Norris with questionable shoulder.
Good example of a team that ended their rebuild two years early.
'Are they preparing for an appeal? How can they not say what he gambled on?
Gee, I wonder.'
Why would the NHL have to say anything? They are a private organization.
Shane Pinto could gladly say whatever it was but he's chosen not to. The NHLPA isn't pushing the issue either. So figure whatever he did wasn't good.
You can wonder, but clear to me they aren't going to admonish players. I wonder if this forum has any level of EQ.Gee, I wonder.