Fogelhund
Registered User
- Sep 15, 2007
- 23,320
- 27,463
They still have the power to strip a player of the captaincy and play the player wherever they want in the lineup to the point of healthy scratch. Marner above all wants money in a new deal and it would affect future earnings if he/Tavares played all of next year on the 4th line and scratched if they bitch or underperform. No PP, no PK and stapled to the bench when the other team pulls their goalie. Mitch won't get 11-12M from any team if he only gets 30-40 regular season points.
That's a nice theory, but it has never happened in the history of the league, and would never happen. Coaches and players want to win, so they'll give themselves the best chance to do so.
Edit - it wouldn't shock me that Marner wants to move on anyway. Too much pressure on him here (internal and external), and he folds every playoffs due to it... the guy is a Toronto kid through and through, and he wants to win, but it just seems to be too much for him... he's probably better off elsewhere, with less pressure.
The announcement that Shanahan will be at the PR on Friday, isn't giving me confidence that there will be the changes that many of us hope for. If he was gone, why pre-announce his participation?Ownership missed the boat for massive changes last year, and I think that's going to cost Shanahan his job. Kind of hard to have these "massive changes" when you no longer have any power on the player due to NMC, MLSE no longer has the power to do anything if the players doesn't want to move on.
I would imagine Shanahan is fired and so is Keefe and Treliving is left waiting for a new boss to be hired.