- Dec 12, 2017
- 26,014
- 12,456
Why not get rid of bothWhat a shitshow!
Rather keep Miky than that hobbit Kerfoot.
Why not get rid of bothWhat a shitshow!
Rather keep Miky than that hobbit Kerfoot.
Even if we had 50 million in cap space I wouldn't sign himi guess this is Dubies way of telling the fans Mik won't work for the peanuts we can offer .
Maybe I'm wrong about this, but wouldn't the Hyman deal have required a great deaL of trust in Holland?Was referring to Dubas’ craftiness in not taking a pick from Edmonton
Maybe I'm wrong about this, but wouldn't the Hyman deal have required a great deaL of trust in Holland?
My understanding is that the deal wasn't simply Edmonton trading a pick to Toronto for Hyman's negotiating rights. If that had been the deal, then yes, Dubas should have just taken the 6th rounder and run. Instead, from I've read, the deal was for Toronto to sign Hyman to a 8 year $5M deal and then trade him to Edmonto for a draft pick.
So, the contract needs to be done before the trade can take place. And I'm pretty sure that Edmonton could still decide to back out of the deal, leaving Toronto with Hyman at $5M for 8 years jand having to find a way to move him since they couldn't afford to keep him at that price.. As a result, Dubas asked for a higher pick to take the risk.
Ot at least that's my take on the situation. And again, I could be wrong.
going about you being a Dubas kiss a**What? What are you going on about. BTW are you going to change your name.
Not sure. Has this scenario ever happened before ? Hard to see GM going back on his word.Maybe I'm wrong about this, but wouldn't the Hyman deal have required a great deaL of trust in Holland?
My understanding is that the deal wasn't simply Edmonton trading a pick to Toronto for Hyman's negotiating rights. If that had been the deal, then yes, Dubas should have just taken the 6th rounder and run. Instead, from I've read, the deal was for Toronto to sign Hyman to a 8 year $5M deal and then trade him to Edmonto for a draft pick.
So, the contract needs to be done before the trade can take place. And I'm pretty sure that Edmonton could still decide to back out of the deal, leaving Toronto with Hyman at $5M for 8 years jand having to find a way to move him since they couldn't afford to keep him at that price.. As a result, Dubas asked for a higher pick to take the risk.
Ot at least that's my take on the situation. And again, I could be wrong.
I am pretty sure he’s being sarcastic. Lol.I don't know if your being sarcastic but Dubas was the GM who signed Tavares not Lou, but I do think regardless of GM he was coming home...you don't say no to talent like that coming for free, even if in retrospect now, it hasn't panned out.
I think this story of a sign and trade is just bunk to cover up the fact that he was offered a 6th and wanted a higher pick and didn't get it. Why would this scenario happen? Think about it logically....it doesn't make any sense. You can just send the rights to Edmonton and they can do what they want. Why would they want you to sign him and then trade him. It's just hocus pocus to cover up the fact we got nothing for him because Dubas wanted to front being a tough negotiator all of a sudden.Not sure. Has this scenario ever happened before ? Hard to see GM going back on his word.
I don't think we tried to trade Hyman's rights. There was an offer for a sign and trade but Edmonton refused to pay for that.
Who would trade for his rights?
Leafs were the only team that could sign Hyman to 8 years, and Edmonton could only offer max 7 in a trade.I think this story of a sign and trade is just bunk to cover up the fact that he was offered a 6th and wanted a higher pick and didn't get it. Why would this scenario happen? Think about it logically....it doesn't make any sense. You can just send the rights to Edmonton and they can do what they want. Why would they want you to sign him and then trade him. It's just hocus pocus to cover up the fact we got nothing for him because Dubas wanted to front being a tough negotiator all of a sudden.
Honestly don't mind this. If we can get rid of Kerfoot and Holl's salary as well and fill the middle 6 with Marlies as well, I would be content. Liljegren is primed for a top 4 spot as a starter and Holl shouldn't sniff that area anymore if this is to be a serious team. I think Abruzzeze and other Marlies who have high compete levels are more than serviceable for third and fourth line duties and I would like to see Robertson and or Knies tried out first in a top 6 role.
I get that part...but if the Leafs traded him to Edmonton before he becomes a UFA...then he is an Oiler and can now sign for 8yrs. The 8yrs thing is not just for an original team....its for anyone under contract with that team when he becomes a UFA.Leafs were the only team that could sign Hyman to 8 years, and Edmonton could only offer max 7 in a trade.
The key to the sign and trade was that with the 8th year the AAV would come down for Edmonton, which was their desire,
Dubas thought the 8th year and lower AAV to Edmonton was worth more than a 6th and wanted a higher draft pick IIRC a 2nd was the ask.
A sign and traded happens and is a legal move, however it was the compensation that both sides could not agree on, so Leafs got no pick for Hyman rights and Edmonton got to sign Zach to only 7 years as UFA.
I think this story of a sign and trade is just bunk to cover up the fact that he was offered a 6th and wanted a higher pick and didn't get it. Why would this scenario happen? Think about it logically....it doesn't make any sense. You can just send the rights to Edmonton and they can do what they want. Why would they want you to sign him and then trade him. It's just hocus pocus to cover up the fact we got nothing for him because Dubas wanted to front being a tough negotiator all of a sudden.
That's how it was explained at the time maybe it was a massive gaslight. It makes more sense in the NBA as trading in some cases somehow allows you to go over the capI get that part...but if the Leafs traded him to Edmonton before he becomes a UFA...then he is an Oiler and can now sign for 8yrs. The 8yrs thing is not just for an original team....its for anyone under contract with that team when he becomes a UFA.
I get that part...but if the Leafs traded him to Edmonton before he becomes a UFA...then he is an Oiler and can now sign for 8yrs. The 8yrs thing is not just for an original team....its for anyone under contract with that team when he becomes a UFA.
I understand WHY Dubas wanted the higher pick...but it wasn't because he had to take the risk of signing Hyman and then trading him. It was simply for the Cap savings he was offering them with the 8th year. Which BTW like you mentioned is going to be troublesome for him when he is trying to dump Mrazek on someone for sure. If he thought a 2/3rd pick was the value of $500k over 7yrs...what is he going to do about Mrazek and is $7.6M owed for 2yrs?They would have gotten the extra year basically for 500k less aav. There was no way they were going to agree to it and then back out however considering they played him on the first or second line lol
The argument from Dubas was that 500k was worth a 2/3. If we buy out mrazek we should remember that argument when we're sitting on 1.4 mil of dead cap
That's how it was explained at the time maybe it was a massive gaslight. It makes more sense in the NBA as trading in some cases somehow allows you to go over the cap
Why not get rid of both
But he’s just a guy. He’s not signing an 8 yr deal, so he’s not worth an asset unless someone can somehow fool Dubas.A sign and trade and trading for rights are basically the same thing.
The only difference in this case is that we refused to take a pick to arguably let the oilers give Zach a better contract. I'd rather pay 500k more a year then have him for the 8th year of that deal
This will virtually be the same thing the team trading for rights will have spoken to his agent and seen ball parks before they puck him up. If not there some won't be any offers for him.
Hyman and the oilers were basically willing to pay a little to do a minor favor and Dubas decided somehow that this was worth a high pick
If you know the number he wants why not it'll save you from bidding and one team going insane with the offer we will probably get a 6/7 for it if we're lucky
![]()
Insider Trading: Habs remain undecided on No. 1 pick - TSN.ca
TSN Hockey Insiders Chris Johnson, Pierre LeBrun and Darren Dreger joing host Kate Beirness to discuss some major topics of interest as the NHL Entry Draft and start of the free agency period are just around the corner.www.tsn.ca
It appears the Leafs are moving on from [unrestricted free agent] Ilya Mikheyev as they have informed teams they are willing to trade his rights, correct?
Johnston: That's right. What's interesting here is obviously before sending out that note, there was nothing worked out with any teams when it comes to Ilya Mikheyev, but the fact it has gone out is indicative of the interest that I believe will be here for this player. There are some that believe that as many as half the teams in the league will show some interest in him as a free agent. It's not to say the Leafs will necessarily be able to make a trade for his rights because I think Mikheyev himself is curious to see what's out there for him on the open market. This is going to be someone of high interest as we get closer to July 13th. He's looking for a contract somewhere in the $4-million range or even above.
Trading for a player's negotiating rights provides a team with exclusive access to signing that player prior to him reaching UFA and being able to talk with any other interested teams. I also feel that most of the teams which trade for a player's rights do end up reaching an agreement with said player more often than not.But he’s just a guy. He’s not signing an 8 yr deal, so he’s not worth an asset unless someone can somehow fool Dubas.