Nucker42
Registered User
- Nov 27, 2011
- 2,580
- 1,850
Maybe, but some bad money has already moved and there’s still PK upside.buyout in 3...2...
Based on the Sharks claiming Goodrow for nothing, I honestly wonder if the cost of getting out of bad deals is going to be minimal going forward. It was obviously pricey with a flat cap, but the cap is going up by a lot this summer and projects to absolutely skyrocket. If you look at pre-COVID costs to get out of bad deals, they tended to be more mild for the most part (Marleau dump being the notable exception).
The Canucks may be able to get out of Mikheyev's deal for little to no assets.
Goodrow is a gritty veteran that wears a letter. There was an organizational culture component to that decision that doesn’t apply here.
Sure, but there’s also higher upside with Mikheyev. Seen Connor Brown’s speed return now given it’s been two years since.Goodrow is a gritty veteran that wears a letter. There was an organizational culture component to that decision that doesn’t apply here.
Based on the Sharks claiming Goodrow for nothing, I honestly wonder if the cost of getting out of bad deals is going to be minimal going forward. It was obviously pricey with a flat cap, but the cap is going up by a lot this summer and projects to absolutely skyrocket. If you look at pre-COVID costs to get out of bad deals, they tended to be more mild for the most part (Marleau dump being the notable exception).
The Canucks may be able to get out of Mikheyev's deal for little to no assets.
I could see a swap for some RFA rights. Like Mikheyev for Luke Kunin's RFA rights.It was a no brainer for the Sharks to claim him, IMO.
I could see a swap for some RFA rights. Like Mikheyev for Luke Kunin's RFA rights.
There's as much upside with Mikheyev as there was with Goodrow. Free NHL roster players who have a modicum of competency. Both players are good at what their role should be. Problem is that both are overpaid. No one would care about either of them if they were making $2mil. If you have a team like the Sharks who need to get to the floor, you're either buying similar players in FA or you can claim/trade for this one.I don’t think there’s much upside for San Jose there.
I imagine at this point, Mikheyev has already "waived" the NTC and would be willing to go nearly anywhere.like goodrow, mikheyev has a limited ntc. this move might be a courtesy precursor to waiving him so a team on that list can grab him.
I mean, it's easy to say that now before anything happens.
I just think people are ignoring that the significant rise in cap may have an impact on these negative value players, and would take the "negative value" more towards pre-COVID levels than flat cap COVID levels.
Sure, but there’s also higher upside with Mikheyev. Seen Connor Brown’s speed return now given it’s been two years since.
VAN radio was saying the pushback from other teams isn’t as much about the injury given the realization that the recovery does really need close to two years, but more so about his confidence being totally shot.
… and I kind of agree. VAN should absolutely have to pay something to get out of this but I think he’s got much more upside than someone like Beauvillier who they didn’t have to pay to move.
Yeah, I’m aware. That’s why I said VAN needs to pay. But, I’m also saying that I think Mikheyev offers more utility than Goodrow or Beauvillier who were taken for free.Fair argument, but I think the wrong player to use it on.
If Mikheyev was a UFA this Summer, would he get $4.75 mil x 2 and a partial-NTC (relevant for a bottom feeder that would try to flip him deadline 2026)? I’m skeptical to say the least.
Beauvillier was an expiring contract. The extra year here is an issue.