Value of: Mike Hoffman

c_mak

Registered User
Jan 15, 2004
1,090
179
Waterloo
You literally wrote : below average teammate :laugh:
He finished his contract with both St.Louis and Florida. Very disingenuous to say "they wanted him outta town after 70pts season" or "didn't last long in St.Louis".
Of course Kane is a better hockey player then Hoffman right now. The point was, even if he was a locker room problem, it's not an issue to a lot of teams. Proofs : Kane with Oilers, Hamonic with your very own Senators, heck, Hoffman to Floride, St.Louis and Montreal haha
Disingenuous, maybe I don't know. I definitely have negative slant on Hoffman. Locker room stuff aside, I think Hoffman is one dimensional player, which was partly the point as well. This was not just a locker room guy conversation My belief is he is a me first guy not a teamfirst guy. Some teams can absorb that some cannot. I would not want Mike Hoffman on my team period full stop.
Hamonic is a little different, there is medical stuff there and family concerns not really the same as Hoffman. Similar in he has a reputation for being a "different cat" but not really the same thing.
 

Habs Halifax

Loyal Habs Fan
Jul 11, 2016
70,792
27,847
East Coast
Funny how Hoffman looks like Drouin with the Habs. These soft turnover kings need great centers in order for them to put up points. Hoffman's value to me is low. Not impossible to move but the Habs won't get valuable futures and we will have to take a contract back.

Letting Danault walk and signing Hoffman, Savard, and Armia. Some of you who put the hate on Danault need to eat crow today. Suzuki/Danault was a great 1/2 punch. All Bergevin had to do was not sign Hoffman and just pay Danault. Then he didn't really have to trade for Dvorak after the KK offer sheet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: c_mak and jfhabs

FerrisRox

"Wanna go, Prettyboy?"
Sep 17, 2003
20,883
14,161
Toronto, Ontario
Letting Danault walk and signing Hoffman, Savard, and Armia. Some of you who put the hate on Danault need to eat crow today. Suzuki/Danault was a great 1/2 punch. All Bergevin had to do was not sign Hoffman and just pay Danault.

This is a weird take, because in order for it to hold together, you have to pretend that Danault left because Armia, Hoffman and Savard were signed.

Danault left because of the term he was looking for and the expectation that Montreal would move forward with Suzuki and Kotkaniemi as their top six centres.

Hoffman was signed to replace the departing Tatar, Savard was signed to replace Weber and Armia was renewed.

The scenario you are presenting is, at best, a re-imagining of what actually happened.
 
  • Like
Reactions: murrough and jfhabs

HuGo Sham

MR. CLEAN-up ©Runner77
Apr 7, 2010
28,611
20,944
Montreal
If anybody offers us something like that where we don't take a contract dump back, I think we accept it. Habs are looking for cap flexibility and moving Hoffman is one way to do it.
in what universe do habs give away guhle to rid themselves of Hoffman? is that what i'm actually reading? seriously ?
 

Goal Caufield50

Registered User
Jul 13, 2007
934
327
This is a weird take, because in order for it to hold together, you have to pretend that Danault left because Armia, Hoffman and Savard were signed.

Danault left because of the term he was looking for and the expectation that Montreal would move forward with Suzuki and Kotkaniemi as their top six centres.

Hoffman was signed to replace the departing Tatar, Savard was signed to replace Weber and Armia was renewed.

The scenario you are presenting is, at best, a re-imagining of what actually happened.
I believe you have it proper characterized
 

Habs Halifax

Loyal Habs Fan
Jul 11, 2016
70,792
27,847
East Coast
This is a weird take, because in order for it to hold together, you have to pretend that Danault left because Armia, Hoffman and Savard were signed.

Danault left because of the term he was looking for and the expectation that Montreal would move forward with Suzuki and Kotkaniemi as their top six centres.

Hoffman was signed to replace the departing Tatar, Savard was signed to replace Weber and Armia was renewed.

The scenario you are presenting is, at best, a re-imagining of what actually happened.

The weird take is thinking you had to sign Armia, Hoffman, and Savard before Danault. :laugh:

Danault left cause we disrespected him and decided to pay Petry and Gallagher but not him. He did not leave because of Suzuki and KK. That makes no sense at all cause he joins the Kings with Kopitar, Byfield, Turcotte.
 
Last edited:

OB5

Registered User
May 2, 2015
5,642
4,046
If I were the owner of the Ottawa Senators, I would trade you a 7th round pick so that I could demote him to the AHL, then the ECHL and then bench him. f*** that guy.
I'll take it
 
  • Like
Reactions: c_mak

RC51

Registered User
Dec 10, 2005
4,951
807
mtl
Hoffman without retention is without worth
Wait a minute. this guy scores an average of what 25 per year over year. and according to YOU his proper contract should be 1/2 of 4.5 mil so 2.25 . ok big shot name more players that have 2.25 contracts and have a 25 goal average for the last 7 years. So your " no worth" statement is way way out of wack. Now if you had said, I would want players but at 1/2 price only. Well good luck signing ANY players for your team.
 

pabst blue ribbon

🇺🇦🤝🇵🇱
Oct 26, 2015
3,283
2,063
PG
Hoffman over the last two seasons has 22 5v5 points in 104 games. This ranks Hoffman as 307th in 5v5 scoring amongst forwards over the past two seasons. Also it should be mentioned that Hoffman has scored 11 5v5 points over 52 games this season for the Habs is the same total he had with the Blues last season in 52 games as well. I don't think the "he plays on a bad team" is a particularly valid excuse.

I don't think that at this point any GM really wants a player who's only value at this point comes from being a good shooter on the PP at 4.5 million price tag for two seasons unless they are really desperate too boost their PP
 
  • Like
Reactions: BKarchitect

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad