Value of: Mikael Granlund to a contender

VeteranPresence

Registered User
Aug 13, 2024
472
797
I can honestly see the Sharks re-signing Granlund instead of shipping him off. It's rare to find guys who can produce like he is in such a difficult situation, and I imagine his experience and leadership are a big reason why Celebrini is having the start he is. Would picking up another draft pick when the team already has 12,000 of them in the next while justify disrupting that?
 

Gecklund

Registered User
Jul 17, 2012
26,152
12,923
California
I can honestly see the Sharks re-signing Granlund instead of shipping him off. It's rare to find guys who can produce like he is in such a difficult situation, and I imagine his experience and leadership are a big reason why Celebrini is having the start he is. Would picking up another draft pick when the team already has 12,000 of them in the next while justify disrupting that?
Sharks don’t have many draft picks in the next few years….

I agree that they might resign him but if a team is offering a first or a package that’s around the value of a first (first and good prospect) then I’d take that.
 

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
71,625
15,325
Folsom
I can honestly see the Sharks re-signing Granlund instead of shipping him off. It's rare to find guys who can produce like he is in such a difficult situation, and I imagine his experience and leadership are a big reason why Celebrini is having the start he is. Would picking up another draft pick when the team already has 12,000 of them in the next while justify disrupting that?
I can see it if the two sides are interested in an extension. The Sharks have good reason to extend him but they also have good reason to rent him. The Sharks don't have 12,000 draft picks at their disposal. They have 15 in the next three years when you start with 21 in any given three year period. As for Granlund's side of it, it doesn't seem like it would be in his best interest to stay there. He's not likely to see the playoffs here and he's not likely to get the most take-home pay staying here either. Now if the atmosphere and relationships developed in just the past season and this one overrides that for him then sure but that seems unlikely to me. The Sharks also just shouldn't pass on an opportunity to get another 1st round pick out of an expiring contract that they simply won't have moving forward.
 

Juxtaposer

Outro: Divina Comedia
Dec 21, 2009
50,177
24,025
Bay Area
I can honestly see the Sharks re-signing Granlund instead of shipping him off. It's rare to find guys who can produce like he is in such a difficult situation, and I imagine his experience and leadership are a big reason why Celebrini is having the start he is. Would picking up another draft pick when the team already has 12,000 of them in the next while justify disrupting that?
It's going to really depend on what teams are offering at the deadline and obviously if Granlund is even interested in sticking around. He would be well within his rights to say, "sorry, I want to play on a good team".

If a team that I am not expecting to make the ECF/WCF offers a 1st round pick, I think that would be hard to turn down. We need to pick up some RHDs, and the guys like Hensler/Mrtka/Fiddler who are looking like late-teens/early 20's picks are really only within our reach if we get a 1st for Granlund.

But if Granlund wants to come back and teams aren't offering a 1st round pick, then I would be happy to re-sign him up to three years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bullslugg

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad