Moving franchises was something that was done when their is no potential owner for the team. Usually these situations are when financial situation has become very dire. How many successful markets have had their teams relocated cause the owner does not get what he wants? Zero
I don't want to rehash every relocation that took place but they were all forced due to poor ownership with lack of funds to continue operating the teams or marketplaces that were mismanged and effected attendance again related to poor management and no potential buyers.
Ottawa is very good NHL marketplace with a bad owner, period. Bettman is in the mode of selling franchises not moving them like in the past. Threats of relocating are on that empty threats , they cause devide between the team and the community when used and is tatic employed when ownership is not getting it's way. If anyone drinks the relocation Kool-Aid you are playing into EM's hand.
Their is probably only one franchise that has any potential to be relocated and that is Arizona and that drama has been going on for 10 years and a few bad owners. Even then Gary is committed to making it work and if he won't let Arizona relocate, a hockey hotbed in Canada like Ottawa will never be up for discussion. The fact that we would even debate that as potential possiblity is very unreal cause we all know EM would never pay for the relocation fee and new arena in a new city and uncertain local and corporate support and no city will pony that kind of money for NHL team specially with EM as the owner.
Fact is Senators are not going anywhere but EM will be out as owner, is just matter of time and patience and you can take that to the bank.
It’s also dependent on the market showing that it can turn a profit for the owner.
Also, a local buyer only matters of the owner is looking sell. If he’s looking to move because the market can be shown to not turn a profit, the NHL won’t be able to stop it in the end, and why would they?
All kinds of measures will be tried, but you are deluding yourself if you’d think Ottawa is anything like Atlanta or Phoenix. The NHL doesn’t need a team in Ottawa to grow the game, fans in Ottawa already have deep loyalties to the Habs and Leafs, and the loyal Sens fans would eventually be snapped up by other teams. Several fans in here are already EK fans over the team.
No, fans should absolutely be worried because boycotting games is a dangerous game. Short term it’s cute, long term it’s deadly. If it can’t succeed in bleeding EM out (there are no indications that this is real option, I mean he is a billionaire, and just because he doesn’t want to use his own money to subsidize the team, doesn’t mean he can’t if push comes to shove), all that you’ve done is created a market that shows itself to not be able/willing to support an NHL team. Arguing that “we have in the past but have stoped because we don’t like the owner” is not going to work if the owner isn’t selling the team , it will just serve to add fuel to a relocation argument. As for fees, no need to worry, any city getting an NHL team that really wants it will cover those costs, let’s be honest.
This city should absolutely be worried. If there is no new arena downtown there is nothing holding the team in town beyond being a strong market, which it hasn’t shown itself to be for a few years now, no matter what the excuses.
The NHL won’t/can’t force a sale, and the owners as a collective won’t support a fanbase dictating ownership in any market.
Care is needed here