Player Discussion Matt Rempe - See Mod Note Post 769

eco's bones

Registered User
Jul 21, 2005
26,970
14,116
Elmira NY
FWIW Parros isn't really fit for the job he has and IMO it can be argued has a bias against the Rangers that goes back to the Rangers (or Dolan) calling him out personally for not suspending Tom Wilson after he drove Artemi Panarin's head into the ice two times leading to Panarin's being out with injury the rest of that season. If we're going to compare Rempe's hit on Heiskanen---Wilson's attack on Panarin was far worse.

Maybe I'm wrong and someone can cite an occasion or two when a player has been suspended for 6 games or more on a play where the player who was the recipient of a hit or attack of some kind wasn't seriously injured. It appears to me though that what Parros has in mind here though is a punishment that's unprecedented.
 

McRanger92

Registered User
Jun 7, 2017
12,822
24,146
FWIW Parros isn't really fit for the job he has and IMO it can be argued has a bias against the Rangers that goes back to the Rangers (or Dolan) calling him out personally for not suspending Tom Wilson after he drove Artemi Panarin's head into the ice two times leading to Panarin's being out with injury the rest of that season. If we're going to compare Rempe's hit on Heiskanen---Wilson's attack on Panarin was far worse.

Maybe I'm wrong and someone can cite an occasion or two when a player has been suspended for 6 games or more on a play where the player who was the recipient of a hit or attack of some kind wasn't seriously injured. It appears to me though that what Parros has in mind here though is a punishment that's unprecedented.

They might as well have Rafi Torres running player safety.

I wonder if the suspension is coming down before the early game today. I imagine these “hearings” are just the DPS telling the offender their predetermined ruling. I guess we’ll find out any time now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eco's bones

nyr2k2

Can't Beat Him
Jul 30, 2005
46,311
34,765
Maryland
FWIW Parros isn't really fit for the job he has and IMO it can be argued has a bias against the Rangers that goes back to the Rangers (or Dolan) calling him out personally for not suspending Tom Wilson after he drove Artemi Panarin's head into the ice two times leading to Panarin's being out with injury the rest of that season. If we're going to compare Rempe's hit on Heiskanen---Wilson's attack on Panarin was far worse.

Maybe I'm wrong and someone can cite an occasion or two when a player has been suspended for 6 games or more on a play where the player who was the recipient of a hit or attack of some kind wasn't seriously injured. It appears to me though that what Parros has in mind here though is a punishment that's unprecedented.
The elbow that Cookie threw on McDonagh that led to Cooke getting what was eventually 17 games, I think McDonagh was ok, I think he may have finished the game even. For Cooke it was because he had been suspended 4 times before and probably fined in there, too.

Rempe is now into repeat offender territory and in a very brief career so he may see some otherwise unusual suspensions, who knows. The fact that he already has a 4-game for the same offense and they're giving him an in-person makes me think they aren't f***ing around and feel like they have to throw the book at him now. I don't believe for a second Rempe wants to hurt anyone, but at his size if he can't get it under control he's really going to hurt someone badly.

The Parros thing is a different story. If the want a player, pick a guy who was tough but not an out and ought fighter. I didn't exactly think Shanny did a good job but he introduced some transparency to the process and was the type of guy they should have running the show. They'd probably do better with a guy who never played at a high level and some senior advisers who played NHL hockey to provide input.
 

eco's bones

Registered User
Jul 21, 2005
26,970
14,116
Elmira NY
The elbow that Cookie threw on McDonagh that led to Cooke getting what was eventually 17 games, I think McDonagh was ok, I think he may have finished the game even. For Cooke it was because he had been suspended 4 times before and probably fined in there, too.

Rempe is now into repeat offender territory and in a very brief career so he may see some otherwise unusual suspensions, who knows. The fact that he already has a 4-game for the same offense and they're giving him an in-person makes me think they aren't f***ing around and feel like they have to throw the book at him now. I don't believe for a second Rempe wants to hurt anyone, but at his size if he can't get it under control he's really going to hurt someone badly.

The Parros thing is a different story. If the want a player, pick a guy who was tough but not an out and ought fighter. I didn't exactly think Shanny did a good job but he introduced some transparency to the process and was the type of guy they should have running the show. They'd probably do better with a guy who never played at a high level and some senior advisers who played NHL hockey to provide input.

Some players get away with a lot of shit just because who they are. Ovechkin for one. Malkin has done a lot of shit too. Wilson's attack on Panarin was way overboard....not even necessarily a heat of battle thing......after which he beat his chest and did a victory howl. There isn't any consistency.....never really has been before with Shanahan or Campbell.

A lot of what's going on with Matthew has to do with all the publicity he's generated since coming into the league. Teaching him a lesson?---that's fine but then be evenhanded with others too but that's something that none of us expect. You don't convict and sentence someone for murder when his alleged victim isn't dead. Again suspensions if they happen at all if a player isn't hurt haven't ever been lengthy.....now we're expecting this one to be? It doesn't show a standard. Parros can judge at his whim.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EdJovanovski

CTRanger

N9Y4R
Jun 20, 2006
1,312
248
The Gold Coast
Rempe will get 6-8 games IMO. And it’s deserved. That was a shit hit, left his feet, drove the elbow into the back of the head. If that happened to a Ranger we’d be calling for blood.
 

Gordon Bombay

HFNYR Head Coach
Oct 13, 2006
2,786
3,534
For the record he left his feet after he made contact, which is allowed. No elbowing motion but definitely got him in the back of the head with it. And a clear boarding hit.

I think the league is trying to make "an example" because they don't know what to do with him. They fear he's going to seriously injure guys because of his size.

It sucks for us because he is a unicorn kind of player. He can definitely impact a game, but the league has decided they don't like that impact and they're gonna neuter him. It sucks
 

SA16

Sixstring
Aug 25, 2006
14,024
13,918
Long Island
For the record he left his feet after he made contact, which is allowed. No elbowing motion but definitely got him in the back of the head with it. And a clear boarding hit.

I think the league is trying to make "an example" because they don't know what to do with him. They fear he's going to seriously injure guys because of his size.

It sucks for us because he is a unicorn kind of player. He can definitely impact a game, but the league has decided they don't like that impact and they're gonna neuter him. It sucks

Why would the league like him? In 33 games he has already managed to injure Bastian, Siegenthaler, Lyubushkin, Van Riemsdyk, and Heiskanen to varying levels. That is the type of player the league should not want.
 

Bruner4329

Registered User
Apr 24, 2016
598
476
If this guy was on another team and did this to a Ranger (Wilson ring a bell) we would all be calling for blood. Sorry there is a smart way to play physical and a dumb way which is what Rempe does. Basically you can't play him in a tight game, especially in the 3rd period. for fear he will do something stupid like he did Friday night. So you dress him and then have him sit for at least 1/3 of the game. Brilliant.
 

will1066

If you score four, you better f'n win the game
Oct 12, 2008
50,038
71,188
1000016356.jpg
 

Bacon Artemi Bravo

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 20, 2007
8,036
12,597
This Carolina game would absolutely count against whatever the suspension ends up being. Final guess is 6 games.

Edit: 8 games seems massively excessive but that would take them through the next meeting with Dallas and the league may choose to do that.
 

LOFIN

Registered User
Sep 16, 2011
17,390
25,018
This Carolina game would absolutely count against whatever the suspension ends up being. Final guess is 6 games.

Edit: 8 games seems massively excessive but that would take them through the next meeting with Dallas and the league may choose to do that.
So he's eligeble to get suspended again... sorry, meant playing again vs the Devils 9th of January
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Bacon Artemi Bravo

Bacon Artemi Bravo

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 20, 2007
8,036
12,597
- recent history
- double infraction
- opponent is completely defenceless
- Rempe never lets up
- the opponent happens to be a star defenceman

Yeah, that's a recipe for a long one
100%. NHL can’t have minor league guys coming up and taking out top players. With the history, while it feels excessive, it’s so hard to defend him at all at this point. Love the guy but it’s a tough look for him.
 

eco's bones

Registered User
Jul 21, 2005
26,970
14,116
Elmira NY
8 games for a play with no injury? I don't think I've ever seen anything like that before

I would expect he'll appeal. A suspension like that for no injury on the play is unprecedented. I know of no other suspension anywhere close to that. The message I get here is that part of his sin is his size and it might even be there are some with power who are setting him up to be banned from the league.
 

Bacon Artemi Bravo

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 20, 2007
8,036
12,597
Can he play in the AHL and then get suspended for an illegal hit in the AHL? Double suspension.
He’s gonna be getting suspended from my beer league team if he keeps it up

I would expect he'll appeal. A suspension like that for no injury on the play is unprecedented. I know of no other suspension anywhere close to that. The message I get here is that part of his sin is his size and it might even be there are some with power who are setting him up to be banned from the league.
They want him suspended through the next time we play Dallas which is Jan 7th. They’re avoiding a shit show on Rempe’s dime. Hard to argue
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad