Value of: Mathew Barzal to the Western Conference
- Thread starter ALEXIVICH CHULKATURI
- Start date
Romang67
BitterSwede
Killer Orcas
Registered User
Love the player but we don't need him and that cap space is nowhere to be found. Lastly not giving Willander up in any deal unless floored as we value him and his ELC when he arrives to the show.
hamzarocks
Registered User
Elias Pettersson (11.5M) + Williander + 1st + Cap Piece (do Nucks have a 4-5M player they want to move?) for Barzal + Dobson?
ALEXIVICH CHULKATURI
Registered User
What if this gets into a bidding war. Could we pry away Lambert?
This is a cap dump proposal.
None of those deals make sense for NYI. They'd be looking for a 1st back on top of an A prospect because a Barzal trade means a rebuild.
ALEXIVICH CHULKATURI
Registered User
They're 6-6-4, that's not exactly lighting the world on fire.
Fjordy
私たちはそうでした - 私たちはそうではありません。
- Jun 20, 2018
- 17,504
- 9,645
ALEXIVICH CHULKATURI
Registered User
SI90
Registered User
Absolutely not. Some nice projects but 27 year old Barzal on a long term contract is worth more.
Coffee
Take one step towards the direction you want to go
- Nov 12, 2021
- 9,241
- 8,086
Huffer
Registered User
- Jul 16, 2010
- 16,940
- 7,072
Honestly, I don't think so IMO. And that's not because I think Lambert is some amazing prospect or anything. It's for the same reason you even made this thread in the first place.
I would be very hesitant to trade a huge package for Barzal due to his contract and the value he brings in comparison.
I think the Jets try and re-sign Ehlers, Appleton, and Pionk (as UFA's), and they'll need to also give raises to Vilardi and Samberg. And they might also try to extend Connor as well (if possible) and that will take a raise as well (although starting in 2026).
The Jets are winning with a more balanced approach, and if Barzal brought a little more value for that $ I could possibly see it (a little more offense, better defense, etc.). But if he also did those things, you likely wouldn't be looking to move him either.
Coffee
Take one step towards the direction you want to go
- Nov 12, 2021
- 9,241
- 8,086
If this is the price for Barzal, Columbus will do Sillinger + 2nd round pick
No retention required
No retention required
Killer Orcas
Registered User
This is very interesting indeed but I think just too big of a risk on both sides. That's one hell of a blockbuster though !!
604
Registered User
- Nov 1, 2011
- 7,392
- 1,618
It’s too much to give for Barzal’s cap hit and Dobson’s request next year.
You need ELC’s in key positions to cover that.
biturbo19
Registered User
- Jul 13, 2010
- 27,268
- 12,401
Yeah. The original proposal is enticing from a Vancouver perspective. Willander (and his potential to be an impact defenceman on an ELC) is so important to the Canucks in the coming years...it makes things questionable. But the value is so good. It'd have to be something like this though, to make the cap work. Even then though, with Dobson due a raise...i'm just not sure they can afford that much $$$ tied up in three defencemen going forward.
The other issue, cap stuff aside, is the question of whether Barzal is a C/W. Because they'd absolutely need him to be a Center to replace Pettersson, who is prone to apparent malaise and scoring slumps...but is also still a generally reliable player defensively, while playing in the middle.
Glorydays22
Registered User
- Nov 21, 2011
- 1,666
- 913
Isles don't consider any of these for Brazal.
Bern, is this you incognito, making this proposal?
