Thirty One
Safe is safe.
- Dec 28, 2003
- 28,981
- 24,357
1. Does that make it better?Have you seen that recently?
2. Tough standard, because the negative posters don't post nearly enough when the Rangers are winning.
1. Does that make it better?Have you seen that recently?
1. Does that make it better?
2. Tough standard, because the negative posters don't post nearly enough when the Rangers are winning.
Orrr....wait....maybe some posters have other pressing matters aside from.....you know....posting.1. Does that make it better?
2. Tough standard, because the negative posters don't post nearly enough when the Rangers are winning.
You are wasting your breath. We are negative because we have not praised every move or live with our heads not in the sand. Us realistic negative types just cannot wait to tear down the team. Or we are not realistic enough because we can poke holes in statistical analysis.And the positive posters don't post nearly enough when the Rangers are losing. Human nature.
You are wasting your breath. We are negative because we have not praised every move or live with our heads not in the sand. Us realistic negative types just cannot wait to tear down the team. Or we are not realistic enough because we can poke holes in statistical analysis.
There is a certain amount of hubris in thinking that the "negative" are not posting because the Rangers are winning. Why? Is that because the "positive" fans think that their arguments are so superior during victories?
Eh, whatever.
If they win the Cup, I will be swathed in sunshine, Inferno. Then we can get back to debating the merits of the tradeWhat holes? Your exact words were that this was a failure of a trade unless they win the cup. There's no difference to alternative situations, its cup or bust. I'm just waiting for us to win the cup so you can join the light side of the force young padawan![]()
Must be an extreme coincidence, then.Orrr....wait....maybe some posters have other pressing matters aside from.....you know....posting.
My job is such that sometimes I have time to do it and I can go through stretches of when I do not. Posting or not posting certainly has nothing to do with whether or not the Rangers are winning or loosing.
To me that's more understandable. This place is ridiculous when the Rangers are losing.And the positive posters don't post nearly enough when the Rangers are losing. Human nature.
What's a better word then?Who said anything about "avoiding" it?
Why someone would avoid discussing their favorite hockey team because they're winning, I don't know.
cool.Go check the main board. I've been defending our honor, and debating the ridiculous Montreal bobbleheading, Thierren's irresponsible comments and pretty much everything else with Canadien fans the entire series.
Maybe. They always seem to find the time when the Rangers are losing.Preoccupied?
Maybe. They always seem to find the time when the Rangers are losing.
Basically a continuation of this thread.Seriously....what the hell is being discussed here? I'm confused.
outside of the playoffs, what jazzes me up about MSL is that he could be the guy who can help us land one of the rare UFAs worth signing, Stamkos in the summer after.
The Lighting aren't letting Stamkos hit free agency.
The Lighting aren't letting Stamkos hit free agency.
Basically a continuation of this thread.
http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showthread.php?t=1598965&highlight=
Truthfully, I'm just upset that the people I was arguing with haven't declared me right and them wrong like I expected.![]()
Thanks, but I was hoping for something more like this:You were right.![]()