Marner or Nylander?
- Thread starter Leafshater67
- Start date
Bouboumaster
Registered User
- Jul 4, 2014
- 9,451
- 7,220
Nylander has more heart for sure, and he has a second gear
However, if we're talking purely about talent, it's Marner, easily
Marner has a hockey IQ and a vision that Nylander simply doesn't possess
However, if we're talking purely about talent, it's Marner, easily
Marner has a hockey IQ and a vision that Nylander simply doesn't possess
GlitchMarner
There was a Glitch and my username was switched
Marner is the better overall player. He's better defensively and plays on the PK.
But he can be flat out ineffective in tight games whereas Nylander has the types of attributes that can make a difference in such games (I wish he would use them more often, though). Both guys have some soft tendencies and neither is much of a grinder, but when Nylander tries, he can shield the puck, drive to the net and manufacture goals in ways Marner simply can't. However, Marner is generally more aware and involved defensively.
But he can be flat out ineffective in tight games whereas Nylander has the types of attributes that can make a difference in such games (I wish he would use them more often, though). Both guys have some soft tendencies and neither is much of a grinder, but when Nylander tries, he can shield the puck, drive to the net and manufacture goals in ways Marner simply can't. However, Marner is generally more aware and involved defensively.
Nylander. More of a game breaker, a complete offensive weapon. Also appears to have the edge in intangibles.
Craig Button
Registered User
Nylander more heart and has another gear????
Nylander floats 90% of the time
There's a lot more to hockey than watching highlights
Nylander floats 90% of the time
There's a lot more to hockey than watching highlights
Craig Button
Registered User
Who Leads Toronto Maple Leafs In Short Handed Ice Time Playoffs | StatMuse
Bryan McCabe has the most career time on ice while shorthanded for the Maple Leafs in the playoffs, at 203:18 on ice.
Craig Button
Registered User
William Nylander Short Handed Ice Time Playoffs | StatMuse
William Nylander has been on the ice for 3:27 while shorthanded in the playoffs in his career.
Marner Short Handed Ice Time Playoffs | StatMuse
Mitch Marner has been on the ice for 97:31 while shorthanded in the playoffs in his career.
Matthews Short Handed Ice Time Playoffs | StatMuse
Auston Matthews has 3:07 on ice while shorthanded in the playoffs in his career.
Marner>Matthews>Nylander Defensively and Offensively
HockeyVirus
Woll stan.
- Nov 15, 2020
- 15,669
- 22,791
I've watched both for a decade.
Marner most times. Two way play and overall talent level easily him.
Nylander when the intensity is high. That is not just playoffs. That is when the arena is bumping and people are going nuts, Nylander always seems to be the guy who thrives in that shit. Marner (and Matthews) shrink most times
Marner most times. Two way play and overall talent level easily him.
Nylander when the intensity is high. That is not just playoffs. That is when the arena is bumping and people are going nuts, Nylander always seems to be the guy who thrives in that shit. Marner (and Matthews) shrink most times
I’d prefer Marner because if I were team building I think I would win more with Marner and some version of a discount nylander than if I did it the other way around. I think if you have some 60% version of Marner you get a ton of turnovers, you stop elevating the play of the rest of the group, but if you have a 60% version of nylander you still probably get 20-25 goals.
This is true but Nylander is really good at floating defensively all game then looking like a hero coming up with a huge goal.
Conspiracy Theorist
Registered User
- Jan 30, 2016
- 5,636
- 1,883
BraveCanadian
Registered User
- Jun 30, 2010
- 14,523
- 3,363
BraveCanadian
Registered User
- Jun 30, 2010
- 14,523
- 3,363
NyQuil
Big F$&*in Q
Marner typically plays against the better defensive units IIRC.
Nylander has a bit of that Martin Havlat role in Ottawa where he plays a fair amount on the 3rd line and feasts on weaker opposition.
Nylander has a bit of that Martin Havlat role in Ottawa where he plays a fair amount on the 3rd line and feasts on weaker opposition.
I mean this argument goes both ways, Marner also gets to play with far superior linemates 99% of the time, while Nylander has to carry a declining Tavares and whatever 3rd/4th liner plug they decide to put on LW.
NyQuil
Big F$&*in Q
True, but Nylander has a lot of individual skill (much like Havlat) which lends itself to playing against weaker opposition.
Nylander gets a lot more rope too (and rightly so) because his salary isn't in the same range.
If they swapped salaries, all of a sudden, the scrutiny is a little more direct in the other direction.
It's an interesting poll. They are differently valuable to some extent.
