yababy
Registered User
- Jun 26, 2015
- 3,443
- 828
Marner shouldn't be paid more than Stone.
No state income tax in Never a just like Florida. Can't make a direct comparison. Calculate the net
Marner shouldn't be paid more than Stone.
Nothing wrong with the contract so long as you need a #1 centre and it doesn't blow your "team discount deal" up in your face.
Team discount is a myth. Building a team on the premise of underpaying players would have been an awful “plan”. If you’re referring to “finding a way to fit” which is what Shanahan said he was clearly referring to what, for example, Matthews did, taking a shorter term at lower cap hit so that we can fit the others.
Marleau and Zaitsev are not going to be easily moved
Lol.
Matthews took the shorter term so he could reach UFA status sooner.
So let me get this straight, every media outlet understands that Shanahan wanted the young players to sign cheaper deals except you?
Shanahan expects sacrifice from core to keep Leafs together - Sportsnet.ca
was reported that Matthews wanted longer term but the higher cap hit didn’t fit.
BS, he wanted freedom and a fastest way to UFA. And Fun as thanked him for not giving UFA years? Come on buddy.
Marner shouldn't be paid more than Stone.
No state income tax in Never a just like Florida. Can't make a direct comparison. Calculate the net
Matthews contract was fine. It was Tavares contract that set up this disaster
You're very good at being dramaticJT signing was the Fuse, and Matthews contract was the Dynamite and Marner' contract is going to be the Match that blows the Leafs Salary Cap sky high.
Matthews contract is #2 highest AAV and Tavares is #3 and if Marner gets $10.5 mil then his will be tied for at least the #5th highest AAV next year.
Maybe UFA players like Karlsson and Panarin, might break into this top 5, but those are all UFA years where the market decides, while both Marner and Matthews deals will include 4 X RFA years as the biggest portion of their terms.
You're very good at being dramatic
People always seem to forget the small things.No state income tax in Never a just like Florida. Can't make a direct comparison. Calculate the net
JT signing was the Fuse, and Matthews contract was the Dynamite and Marner' contract is going to be the Match that blows the Leafs Salary Cap sky high.
Matthews contract is #2 highest AAV and Tavares is #3 and if Marner gets $10.5 mil then his will be tied for at least the #5th highest AAV next year.
Maybe UFA players like Karlsson and Panarin, might break into this top 5, but those are all UFA years where the market decides, while both Marner and Matthews deals will include 4 X RFA years as the biggest portion of their terms.
People always seem to forget the small things.
Taxes
The dollar can and us
This is a question for all those underemployed research assistants out there with time on their hands ...
What is the percentage of UFA signing that actually pan out over the entire contract?
For example, Marleau's deal, although a shorter duration contract, was probably good for 1.5 years out of the 3. I'm not thinking this year will be better.
In many cases are you're buying retirement years?
It will be interesting to see if RFA or UFA become the players high point.
It will interesting how Tavares at age 35 & age 36 in the last 2 years of his deal is still worth $11 mil cap hit and how that impacts the rest of the roster, particularly when Matthews, Nylander and Marner (assuming 5-6 year deal) next contracts are due again as they hit UFA status at age 26 & 27.
IF JT is now just a 60 point player and Mitch and Matthews are up and asking $15 mil in 5-6 years.
Getting Marner on an 8 year deal this time might make that less on a problem down the road.
It will interesting how Tavares at age 35 & age 36 in the last 2 years of his deal is still worth $11 mil cap hit and how that impacts the rest of the roster, particularly when Matthews, Nylander and Marner (assuming 5-6 year deal) next contracts are due again as they hit UFA status at age 26 & 27.
IF JT is now just a 60 point player and Mitch and Matthews are up and asking $15 mil in 5-6 years.
Getting Marner on an 8 year deal this time might make that less on a problem down the road.
This is a question for all those underemployed research assistants out there with time on their hands ...
What is the percentage of UFA signing that actually pan out over the entire contract?
For example, Marleau's deal, although a shorter duration contract, was probably good for 1.5 years out of the 3. I'm not thinking this year will be better.
In many cases are you're buying retirement years?
It will be interesting to see if RFA or UFA become the players high point.
Or maybe this current recipe doesn’t work and we will have gladly traded Marner away in a DeRozan for Leonard type shakeup.
If we can get McDavid for marner I'm all in
There are a lot of overpayments I'd take for Marner.
Carlo and McAvoy would be nice.