Remember that Aho also did that with an extra 1:30 per game of ice time over Matthews, which given the # of games Aho played and the amount of ice time he gets on average, is an extra 6 games. That makes his PPG a 0.94 vs. 1.07 for Matthews.
Aho also had 50 more minutes of PP time than Matthews over their first two seasons (I am sure he eclipsed Matthews again this year, but I don't have the exact TOI #'s). That also inflates his numbers a little bit too.
Matthews also has the added benefit of being a lot better at faceoffs (which are important for elite centers) and being the best ES goal scorer in his generation.
So to answer your question, Matthew really is worth 3 mill more per year than Aho. And since this is a Marner thread, he's worth at least 2 mill more than Marner too.
Why did goal totals count in comparison when you just wrote of Matthews and Aho, but aren't a consideration for Marner and his comparables?
But regardless, ENOUGH of this.
I don't care what needs to change.
I don't care if it's the players, the gm, the coach. I don't care anymore.
The leafs can NO LONGER pay
FAR more money than other teams do for similar production. I don't CARE about 5v5 short handed goals/60 and other such nonsense. The leafs need to STOP paying a premium on REAL points. To STOP paying 70 point players as though they score 120.
Again, if that change is on the coach, then so be it. But ENOUGH of paying WAY more money for similar
real point production.