Salary Cap: Marner Contract Discussion - Winter is coming

Who signs 1st.


  • Total voters
    216
Status
Not open for further replies.

nobody

Registered User
Aug 8, 2017
3,723
3,304
Realistically.

Lets say the Leafs cannot get Marner signed and other teams cant get their players signed.

Leafs obviously have money to spend and have a 5 year cup window starting this season so they dont have any time to waste......

WPG - Laine
OR
COL - Rantanen

If Mitch cannot get signed, witch player would you trade Marner for straight up?

Laine (9M x 8 years)
Line Combo: Laine-Matthews-Nylander

OR

Rantanen (9M x 8 years)
Line Combo: Hyman-Tavares-Rantanen
Don't want Laine.

No chance in hell Sakic would trade Rantanen for a guy he's going to have to pay more.
 

yubbers

Grown Menzez
May 1, 2013
36,534
5,856
its not that man. canadian household debt is pretty high; people (especially youngsters) are spending money like there is no tomorrow - all on credit; so if they lose jobs etc... they will have to default; i.e. not buying anymore hockey stuff because getting food to eat and place to live will trump paying for hockey stuff; that means league to break even will have to raise ticket prices across the board and the game tickets that were affordable before will not be anymore to some proportion of hockey fans ---- its a ripple effect man.

The tax breaks that the liberals gave us; means they earned less in revenue and they kept spending; i.e. taxes are probably going to increase on the households later as well -> that means less after tax income for canadians to spend on luxury items like hockey tickets etc...
Fully agree we have issues in Canada. Unless the Federal reserve goes off....US is in pretty good shape imho
 

Kiwi

Registered User
Mar 5, 2016
21,650
16,836
The Naki
the "we can and we will" remark really did rub me the wrong way and him saying "will not trade nylander" pissed me off even more; no reason to make a player more important than the team.

no player is more important than the team

Agreed, making knee jerk decisions is bad business but falling in love with players isn't good business either

There assets, behave accordingly
 
  • Like
Reactions: PromisedLand

IPS

Registered User
Sep 28, 2017
16,482
27,085
Realistically.

Lets say the Leafs cannot get Marner signed and other teams cant get their players signed.

Leafs obviously have money to spend and have a 5 year cup window starting this season so they dont have any time to waste......

WPG - Laine
OR
COL - Rantanen

If Mitch cannot get signed, witch player would you trade Marner for straight up?

Laine (9M x 8 years)
Line Combo: Laine-Matthews-Nylander

OR

Rantanen (9M x 8 years)
Line Combo: Hyman-Tavares-Rantanen

If Laine lived up to his potential it'd be f***in' wicked having the best ES goal scorer in the game (Matthews) and the best PP scorer in the game (potentially ofc) on the Leafs.

That's risky business though, but I'm of the strong opinion that Laine will bounce back
 

nobody

Registered User
Aug 8, 2017
3,723
3,304
If Laine lived up to his potential it'd be ****in' wicked having the best ES goal scorer in the game (Matthews) and the best PP scorer in the game (potentially ofc) on the Leafs.

That's risky business though, but I'm of the strong opinion that Laine will bounce back
Have you seen the dude play hockey? I'm sorry but I'm not trading Marner for a one trick PP pony. Laine is beyond atrocious 5 on 5 and this guy skates like he's stuck in mud. He has no handles to top things off. No vision. No hockey sense. Winnipeg would be stupid to pay that guy more than 7-8 million. He might be a 50/60 goal guy in the future but I don't think I've seen a more one dimensional player.
 

baton elevated

One Man Gang
Jun 4, 2009
1,353
821
Would Eichel turn Tavares into a 47 goal scorer? I don't think so. Would Babs allow Auston Matthews to ever play with Eichel or Marner? I don't think so.

Like I said, Eichel is a great player for what he is. He's a guy that is built to lead teams not play a secondary role. On the Leafs he's a tertiary option on the PP and secondary option playing with JT/ AM who are both elite shooters. Marner's bread and butter is his play making. Eichel doesn't have anywhere near as good play making abilities.

And like I've said multiple times before. Eichel's effort levels would not fly in Toronto under Babs. He would either end up glued to the bench or centering the 4th line because of his inconsistent effort levels. The media would eat him alive and I don't think the fans would be forgiving either. Eichel is to me what a guy like Ilya Kovalchuk used to be for the Thrashers. All skill, brings fans to the arena to watch him play. When he's on, he's lights out, when he's not on, he's pretty useless. You unfortunately don't win with guys like Eichel. Marner has pretty much demolished every league he's every played in. He has won pretty much every major junior award there is individually and as a team. He's been a captain of some formidable OHL teams and he's a heart and soul full out energy guy who the rest of the team thrives off of. Eichel just doesn't bring those extra intangibles. Sometimes you gotta take the "lesser" player because he brings more overall to the team. Marner is no doubt is inferior to Eichel as an athlete. But Marner is the much better hockey player.
Don't get me wrong, I really like Mitch (all this nonsense aside). I think Eichel playing with Matthews would be magic. They proved that in the 3 0n 3 all stars games. Alas, to each their own teams.
 

yubbers

Grown Menzez
May 1, 2013
36,534
5,856
I really hope that chatter about Matthews not getting the C cause it might hurt the Marner negotiations is hot air
 

nobody

Registered User
Aug 8, 2017
3,723
3,304
Don't get me wrong, I really like Mitch (all this nonsense aside). I think Eichel playing with Matthews would be magic. They proved that in the 3 0n 3 all stars games. Alas, to each their own teams.
If it was a guaranteed that Matthews would play with Eichel and that JT wouldn't have a drop off playing with Willy, I'm all game to get Eichel. But I don't see either of those things happening. Other stuff mentioned incorporated into the argument, having Mitch is basically a no-brainer. As tantalizing as it seems to have Auston and Eichel together.
 

PromisedLand

I need more FOOD
Dec 3, 2016
44,969
60,476
Hogwarts
This is why the league should have based contracts on percentage of the cap instead of dollar amounts. No escrow problems. No reason for the league to fear a recession, or changes in the CDN dollar, or for the players to worry about signing a long term contract and then the cap going up a lot.

In theory it might work but in practice this gets complicated because if a player is making say 10% of the cap when they signed the contract that means they will keep making 10% of the cap whether the cap goes up or down; so teams will not be able to get "good deals" and load up on their roster.

For example: McDavid's cap hit looks pretty big now but if the cap were to keep increasing his cap hit would not look that bad 2 to 3 years from now and oilers can add to their team while McDavid is locked long term.

Same thing happened with Crosby and Malkin; the team struggled when they were taking sizable proporiton of the cap; but as cap kept increasing and crosby and malkin's cap hit remained the same; pens had the cap flexibility to add in talent like Kessel and got 2 cups out of it.

Would not be surprised if Hawks also get to do something similar with Kane and Toews.

Only difference is that recent signings of the core players McDavid, Kucherov, Stamkos, Eichel, etc... have been long term deals; Leafs on the other hand got screwed with Matthews deal with only 5 year term

suppose the cap increases significantly by the time matthews 4th year is around the corner; leafs can then add good depth to help the team on the 4th and 5th year of matthews for a deep run; after that it is back to drawing board.

If Matthews was locked in for 8 years; Leafs would have had a lot of flexibility and more chances at cup runs as matthews' cap hit would have been locked for 8 years so with the cap increases money could have been spent in addressing other areas in matthews' 4th or 5th year onwards to help improve the team dramatically.

oh welll......
 

Suntouchable13

Registered User
Dec 20, 2003
44,579
20,794
Toronto, ON
Have you seen the dude play hockey? I'm sorry but I'm not trading Marner for a one trick PP pony. Laine is beyond atrocious 5 on 5 and this guy skates like he's stuck in mud. He has no handles to top things off. No vision. No hockey sense. Winnipeg would be stupid to pay that guy more than 7-8 million. He might be a 50/60 goal guy in the future but I don't think I've seen a more one dimensional player.

I couldn't agree more, man. Laine is as one dimensional as it gets.
 

PromisedLand

I need more FOOD
Dec 3, 2016
44,969
60,476
Hogwarts
Fully agree we have issues in Canada. Unless the Federal reserve goes off....US is in pretty good shape imho

I looked at my grocery bill from last year (found a receipt) and compared it to what I paid my last grocery trip. brought pretty much the same stuff and ended paying 30 bucks more than I did last year for one grocery trip. My annual income hasn't increased at the same rate as my grocery bills (or gas prices lol; etc...); i.e. I am not paying for hockey stuff as much as I used to before.

I am sure that is the same for other Canadians as well. Unless I am an outlier :laugh:

Federal Reserve is not an independent body; it is backed by several private banks unlike Bank of Canada; so am always a bit nervous about the Fed ;)
 

nobody

Registered User
Aug 8, 2017
3,723
3,304
Off topic:
Two things I find absolutely ridiculous are the facts that 1. Matthews vs. Laine used to be a thing. (I understand blind homerism by the finnish fanboys but all of that seem beyond stupid at this point. It's not even a remote competition between the two.) 2. Winnipeg Jets are moving on from Nik Ehlers instead on Laine. Ehlers has the potential to be a speed demon who can be an elite play maker and has a nice shot to boot. I wish the Leafs would scoop in and get him out of Winnipeg but I feel like that is beyond a pipe dream.

Oh what I would do to have Ehlers - Matthews - Nylander as a top line. I think that would be the best top line in the NHL by a country mile. The amount of skill, speed and creativity on that unit would be off the charts good.
 

Menzinger

Kessel4LadyByng
Apr 24, 2014
42,074
34,576
St. Paul, MN
Leafs should announce Matthew's getting the C and start leaking trade rumors to tsn on the same day for Marner.

Marner can either make 60 million playing for his hometown team for the next 6 years or he can have fun playing in irrelevancy in the sunbelt for 70 million.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: beleaf101

nobody

Registered User
Aug 8, 2017
3,723
3,304
But Marner is better than Rantanen.
He is. And therefore he will get paid more. However, Joe Sakic and the Avalanche are cheap and will go with the slightly inferior player to save atleast a couple of mil on the total contract.
 

baton elevated

One Man Gang
Jun 4, 2009
1,353
821
I looked at my grocery bill from last year (found a receipt) and compared it to what I paid my last grocery trip. brought pretty much the same stuff and ended paying 30 bucks more than I did last year for one grocery trip. My annual income hasn't increased at the same rate as my grocery bills (or gas prices lol; etc...); i.e. I am not paying for hockey stuff as much as I used to before.

I am sure that is the same for other Canadians as well. Unless I am an outlier :laugh:

Federal Reserve is not an independent body; it is backed by several private banks unlike Bank of Canada; so am always a bit nervous about the Fed ;)
Don't forget the Utilities. In the process of renewing House and Auto insurance, ouch. get ready for a shocker guys and gals!
 
  • Like
Reactions: PromisedLand

A1LeafNation

Good, is simply not good enough!
Oct 17, 2010
27,817
17,960
Agreed, making knee jerk decisions is bad business but falling in love with players isn't good business either

There assets, behave accordingly
Pretty sure if Jones was offered for Nylander, Dubas will drive Willy to the airport and boot his ass out the car while moving.

Pretty sure if there is an offersheet on Marner for 4 1st rounders Dubas will take that and run.

He will the proceed to laugh at all the comments of everyone whine over what we said in the past being untrue.
 

Menzinger

Kessel4LadyByng
Apr 24, 2014
42,074
34,576
St. Paul, MN
More and more I'm liking the idea of 3 year bridge followed by trade. WN and KK both have more to give, I really think that in three years time having them as a 1-2 punch would still be + level.

Even as a "one year rental" that trade value would still be high

The one advantage of that 3 year deal, even at at absurd aav is that it allows the Leafs to get full value for him at a trade next offsesson if they want.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigBlu

Coachcorner

Senor Martinez
Sep 28, 2017
6,285
4,989
But Marner is better than Rantanen.
In some ways, but rantanen got game too. It's useless to compare the too. Rantanen would not be the great ice hockey player marner is in toronto, never. Rantanen in toronto would be real good, but not like marner. Marna does pk, blocking that thang, pp killa, all time killa, leader too in some ways, rantanen got that twerk body, he strong and bigger like notorious, marner got that liked sympathy, rantanen could never have that in toronto. Everybody loves marna, he the city's own. We owe him now, but if he ain't singin......he could get more hatas. Don't it marne.r

Do the right thang like spike lee do.
 

A1LeafNation

Good, is simply not good enough!
Oct 17, 2010
27,817
17,960
If Marner signs a 3 year deal he will be traded before the end of it.

Dubas don't want to deal with these idiots again in 3 years. Leafs have Nylander, Johnsson, Kapanen, Kerfoot, Hyman Bracco, Moore, Mikheyev Korshkov and a shit ton of other wingers who can fill out the top 9 over the next 3 years and won't cost as much.
 

Stephen

Moderator
Feb 28, 2002
81,399
59,026
I think the way it's working out is this: Dreger works for Paul and Ferris and he spouts off stuff to get a feel of what the public would think if it were true. Dubas uses CJ to answer back to those stupid Dreger comments and here we are.

I just think we should try and trade him instead of playing around...if the captaincy is going to be an issue on top of not getting AM money...why do you want this guy near your team? MM has never been a captain of his junior team (neither did AM..but he was always younger than the others)...so he gets butt hurt over the obvious choice for captain. And before someone says that's BS...remember that Paul Marner freaked out last december or January because MM was not being included in the Captaincy talk...so there is a fire under all that smoke.

This is Lindros 2.0...Quebec made off like a bandit in that deal...lets do the same.

I find Team Marner is really misplaying the whole Mitch Marner vs Auston Matthews angle in this market. As much soft power and brand image Marner's built for himself the past few years with his high energy, fun loving persona, there's something very annoying about the way they have complained so much and it's all basically based on the fact that the Leafs seem to have historically prioritized Matthews over him.

So far, using Dreger and the agent as mouthpieces, Team Marner has complaining publicly about the captaincy conversation, complained about the lack of Schedule A bonuses negotiated under Lou, militant no home town discount policy, refusal to negotiate in season, insistence on negotiating last, complained about the negotiation process the day Auston Matthews re-signed, made the threat of an offer sheet, made the threat of an offer sheet tour on less, and finally, the threat of going to Switzerland to the ZSC Lions to "train."

I just have a hard time seeing this player and his entourage being very fun to deal with over the long term. I don't get the sense it's going to mellow out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: usernamezrhardtodo

Menzinger

Kessel4LadyByng
Apr 24, 2014
42,074
34,576
St. Paul, MN
There's also almost zero chance the Leafs are going to be able to fit a 15 mil Marner in 3 seasons under the cap - maybe 6-7 once the cap rises enough by then.
 

Kiwi

Registered User
Mar 5, 2016
21,650
16,836
The Naki
Pretty sure if Jones was offered for Nylander, Dubas will drive Willy to the airport and boot his ass out the car while moving.

Pretty sure if there is an offersheet on Marner for 4 1st rounders Dubas will take that and run.

He will the proceed to laugh at all the comments of everyone whine over what we said in the past being untrue.

You see making trades is hard but necessary sometimes, in the real world unless your dealing with Edmonton nobody is doing something completely stupid like your rather pointless example

But sure let's just keep on keeping on with Marner doing what he wants with zero pushback , it's a real winner

Dubas won't match? Sure of that are we because at the draft Dubas said something about looking at the offer then making a decision, I'm not sure what "take that and run" looks like to you but to me it ain't that
 

Stephen

Moderator
Feb 28, 2002
81,399
59,026
Leafs should announce Matthew's getting the C and start leaking trade rumors to tsn on the same day for Marner.

Marner can either make 60 million playing for his hometown team for the next 6 years or he can have fun playing in irrelevancy in the subelt for 70 million.

Dubas has been pretty respectful of Marner for the whole process publicly, but at some point, don't you just tell the Marner camp that "maybe we'll shop you around."

Brendan Shanahan said it himself. It's a privilege to be a Leaf. Marner acts like he's the heir to the empire.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad