Kizimov just got sent down to the VHL. Better for him though since he was the 13th forward most days.Hoping SDA can get some good minutes in the KHL.
He will be playing with leafs prospect Semyon Kizimov
Does the NHLe model only take into consideration points, age, and league to create projections? If so, how does it show amirov to be so far ahead in his development if kapanen was 0.5ppg in liiga while amirov is below that? I know the liiga is weighed down, but the difference shouldn’t be that bad.
Thanks!He hasn't fully explained his methodology (I saw someone asked earlier this week), but I assume he takes all that into account and the strength of the league that specific season.
Also, he does only take into account where the player showed best that specific season if they play in multiple leagues. Him crushing the MHL last year in his D+0 shows better for NHLe / his star rating than it did for Kap in Liiga in his D+0.
Hoping SDA can get some good minutes in the KHL.
He will be playing with leafs prospect Semyon Kizimov
The NHLe models are great but there is a sampling issue for players that have taken Liljegren or Sandin’s development path. Not only is there not a particularly large sample of players that have played in the AHL when they were 18, or 19, the ones that did were the cream of the crop, generally high draft picks like the William Nylanders or the Radek Faksas ... guys that teams have high expectations of and who will get some NHL minutes. Generally these rookies are given easier minutes. During his Marlies tenure, Liljegren’s role did also change to a more defensive oriented one but he’s also had to contend with multiple high ankle sprains. Not only was his play impacted(quickness, pivots) but also his initial exposure to the NHL.I believe his model heavily values production (which is fair since that is really the only publicly available stat) and if you look at a guy like Liljegren solely based off of his production in the AHL as an 18/19 year old, it is obviously not great... And he is being compared to guys who are generally the cream of the crop. However, keep in mind that he has been playing tough minutes from pretty much day 1 there, whereas most other guys his age are spoon fed offensive minutes and cushy matchups that would really play up in his model.
Liljegren did not come out of nowhere, he is now just being recognized for what he has always been: a top prospect.
maybe it’s just me but I think the expectations placed on Liljegren were part of the reason why he fell - he was highly touted coming into his draft year as a top-5 pick but fell to our hands. I think he’s been written off far too early, especially since both he and Sandin have been outperforming their colleagues. This downtime is good and bad since they both need the NHL reps but for a guy like Sandin, this extra time can be instrumental in getting up to game shape.
I believe his model heavily values production (which is fair since that is really the only publicly available stat) and if you look at a guy like Liljegren solely based off of his production in the AHL as an 18/19 year old, it is obviously not great... And he is being compared to guys who are generally the cream of the crop. However, keep in mind that he has been playing tough minutes from pretty much day 1 there, whereas most other guys his age are spoon fed offensive minutes and cushy matchups that would really play up in his model.
Liljegren did not come out of nowhere, he is now just being recognized for what he has always been: a top prospect.
I mean Liljegren isn't a flashy player offensively but he did just have the 9th highest PPG ever for a 20 year old defensemen in the AHL. If he managed just 1 more point he would have been 4th.Completely agree on the expectations point with Liljegren.
I'd also add he was touted as a flashy offensive defenseman coming into his draft year but that's just not been his role and I don't think he's that type of player. I see him as a guy who uses his skating to be a good transition defender.
I would actually compare him to Dermott in a lot of ways. Similar size, both good skaters, good defenders at even strength/2nd PK type of guys, and both have good offensive tools but I don't see the creativity for either to be big point producers at the NHL level.
No points so far for Amirov, Salavat leads 4 1 în the 3rd period
I dont think he's devoid of offensive ability I just dont see high end offense there - especially compared to the pre draft hype of a high risk pp QB type player.I mean Liljegren isn't a flashy player offensively but he did just have the 9th highest PPG ever for a 20 year old defensemen in the AHL. If he managed just 1 more point he would have been 4th.
He also managed that with secondary PP time most of the year where guys like Theodore/Faulk/Green/Brannstrom all had the majority of powerplay opportunities.
His offense is better than most give him credit for.
I dont think he's devoid of offensive ability I just dont see high end offense there - especially compared to the pre draft hype of a high risk pp QB type player.
Back to the Dermott comparison, he had 18 pts in 28 games vs. 30 pts in 40 games for Liljegren as 20 year olds in the AHL. Liljegren does have a better shot which could help make him a 2nd pp guy though.
Ah yes, you are right. Should never trust the Hockey DB ages, he turned 21 in December of that season.Dermott was 21 when he had 18 points in 28 games. He had 24 points in 59 games as a 20 year old.