The idea of a skill vs size dichotomy is not really always A or B, but there dirty jobs that need to be done in any hockey game. Many of those tasks fall to guys lower in the line up. That is where size can be more useful than “skill.” That’s where a guy like Kleven could get a toe hold in the NHL more easily than a “skill guy” because he’s built to handle game situations where someone else is going to have a hard time. It’s not that complicated and it’s not a referendum on either.
Dirty jobs can be done higher up the lineup, an example of that is Tanev.
The skilled jobs can be done lower down the lineup as well, an example of that is Ghost.
I agree that the low skilled players who do nothing other than PK are going to be in higher demand than a skilled PP specialist who doesn't do much else because of most organizational needs.
Usually, the top 4 is filled more with two way guys or play driving D than a bunch of guys like Tanev/Brodie.
I think we agree, I just think we likely disagree on Kleven being more useful... a #6 who PKs, is big, and generally useless outside of that is a dime a dozen and an easy UFA signing.
We were collecting these types last year.