Byron Bitz
Registered User
- Apr 6, 2010
- 7,894
- 4,234
*smaller, weaker, smarter version of himIt would be weird to trade Lilly only to call up a smaller, weaker version of him.
*smaller, weaker, smarter version of himIt would be weird to trade Lilly only to call up a smaller, weaker version of him.
Plus you don't want two smaller rhd, one will do.*smaller, weaker, smarter version of him
maybe we have enuff shrimps
Is Steeves a center? I thought he was playing mostly wing.What's the low down on Steeves? Can't say I recall a prospect who from age ~22-24 in the AHL consistently put up top line numbers (has 154 points in 188 AHL games, pretty evenly distributed among his 3 seasons), and then pretty much never got a shot in the NHL. Maybe Kozun, but he was 5'8.
He's been given 7 NHL games, at most 3 in any season, and generally <10 minutes per game. So really, he hasn't been given any kind of shot at the NHL level. Is he an awful skater? Have some other issue likely to hold him back? Like he could easily be the next AHL AAAA player (eg Petan, TJ Brennan, etc), but he could also be the next Marchment/McMann. Would be a shame to watch him flourish elsewhere after never getting a shot here, especially when C depth has been a weakness of ours.
Yeah, maybe Greb-Holmberg-Nylander could work. Greb is chippy, Holmberg responsible, and Willy can drive it.
A Marner trade could reshape things. If there’s a C in there, maybe they slot with Pontus OR Greb on one flank with Willy on the other.
If Cowan sticks, I could see NickRob OR McMann-JT-Cowan working. That could distribute the offence well and push guys down.
The others compete on rhe fourth line with Dewar and Reaves and for a chance to move up.
Lots of in house options that get deeper if we see a big trade.
That’s good information.
And those players go through their learning curves.
I like the sounds of that.
Lily won't get traded if he signs a 2 year $1.4 M contract.He is 3rd pairing with Edmundson.He has no real trade value right now.It would be weird to trade Lilly only to call up a smaller, weaker version of him.
If he is good enough to be a 3rd pairing dman at 25 yrs of age, he has some trade value. But not the first we invested to pick him in the first place.Lily won't get traded if he signs a 2 year $1.4 M contract.He is 3rd pairing with Edmundson.He has no real trade value right now.
Lily won't get traded if he signs a 2 year $1.4 M contract.He is 3rd pairing with Edmundson.He has no real trade value right now.
I doubt Leafs move him for a 2nd and he won't get much at contract time.If he is good enough to be a 3rd pairing dman at 25 yrs of age, he has some trade value. But not the first we invested to pick him in the first place.
So give him a one year. He either plays well or is TD bait.He signed that deal last time so he's getting a pay rise on his next deal
Caps gone up and we're buying more UFA years
The cap has only gone up like 6% thought. A 6% raise on 1.4 is still under his qualifying offer of 1.5He signed that deal last time so he's getting a pay rise on his next deal
Caps gone up and we're buying more UFA years
The cap has only gone up like 6% thought. A 6% raise on 1.4 is still under his qualifying offer of 1.5
I doubt Leafs move him for a 2nd and he won't get much at contract time.
So give him a one year. He either plays well or is TD bait.
Next two years are both RFAWe were buying RFA years though, I'm presuming we're buying UFA years now to (unless it's a one year deal)
Switched mid thought from "Next 2 are RFA" to "two years to UFA"He's getting a raise
I don't know if Tre values him enough to even bother taking him to arb, he may just throw him into a deal or trade him for a pickSwitched mid thought from "Next 2 are RFA" to "two years to UFA"
The only thing he might have in has favour is a potential arbitration ruling with his point totals, facing GM that didnt sign his last deal and just re-upped someone he seems to value more (Benoit) for less
He might be their best option.Any chance Leafs use Niemela as a #6, #7 guy next year? With PP minutes on either unit depending on how it goes?
If thats all he is. yes I think this would be as a 3rd pairing pp guy so not used the same way. I'm looking forward to Niemela's year two in the A to see how much 70 games of experience and a summer working out show on the ice. We will get a look at some of that in camp.It would be weird to trade Lilly only to call up a smaller, weaker version of him.
Any chance Leafs use Niemela as a #6, #7 guy next year? With PP minutes on either unit depending on how it goes?
If Liljegren gets traded his chances of that improve but I think most likely scenario is he will be first call up in case of injury
I think hes worth keeping in the system, especially if.he has a strong next season. At least as an AHL/ECHL path for the next couple years. I'd see him more as a potential #7/6
He's got s good hockey IQ, makes lots of quite plays really well which don't always make.thr highlight reel but make a positive on ice impact