Marlies GDT: Marlies Calder Cup Champions!!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Canada4Gold

Registered User
Dec 22, 2010
43,047
9,234
That should have been very easy. If what the commentators were saying is correct and they’re only allowed to look at the 1 view then the AHL needs to fix that when other views are obviously available. I can see how the overhead may have been confusing since ththe stick went into the twine the same time the puck was going over and you wouldn’t see the puck height from the overhead. But if there are views available you should be allowed to use them. Let’s not put yourself in a situation when a game is awarded when it was obvious from unusable angles it’s not a goal. No cutting off tor nose to spite your face please
 

Sonny21

Registerd User
Oct 3, 2009
5,950
503
That should have been very easy. If what the commentators were saying is correct and they’re only allowed to look at the 1 view then the AHL needs to fix that when other views are obviously available. I can see how the overhead may have been confusing since ththe stick went into the twine the same time the puck was going over and you wouldn’t see the puck height from the overhead. But if there are views available you should be allowed to use them. Let’s not put yourself in a situation when a game is awarded when it was obvious from unusable angles it’s not a goal. No cutting off tor nose to spite your face please

Yep, also, what if the home team simply doesn't show the reply because benefits them not to? We've seen it many times in NHL where home teams don't show certain replays or angles in time so coaches have harder time to challenge.

This just takes it to the next level if you rely on the jumbo-tron for the review.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad