Hasek did stone Lemieux twice in the 92 finals on breakawaysHasek struggled against Pittsburgh in general. (Lemieux and Jagr having a lot to do with it). I remember hearing during the 2001 Buffalo series that his career stats against the pens were the worst of all teams.
You aren't wrong. 7:40 in the video.
Wow!!!. Lemieux was unbelievable.Insane reach, and with his skill its no chance
Mario was the complete package. If you would put together the components of a perfect hockey player, you would come up with Mario.
"Three full years of rest" lollllllllIt's actually massively overrated.
Lemieux was the second best player on his own line for a whopping half season, after three full years of rest. Then he fell apart in the playoffs, scoring zero goals and 3 points in his last six games despite playing ridiculously high minutes. People extrapolate that half season as proof that Lemieux could still dominate, but in reality he did the best he could and he was unable to handle playing hockey anymore.
Lemieux never led the NHL in anything after age 31.
Certainly worse team than Gretzky played in his prime years.Wow!!!. Lemieux was unbelievable.
Look the Pens roster in 88-89 when he did 199 points in 76 games.
The Pens first power play unit was:
Lemieux
Coffey
Rob f.. Brown
Bob who Errey
Russ!!!! Taglianetti!!!
199 points with those guys.
In 87-88 the roster was even worse..and he did 168 points.
This is the prime healthy Lemieux at 22-23 years old.
After that 160 points in 60 games with cancer in 92-93...
A Real phenom
He quit smoking before the 87-88 seasonJust imagine him if he was healthy, didn’t smoke and trained under Gary Roberts.
Bob Errey actually didn't score a PP point that entire season. And Taglianetti was with with Winnipeg in 1988-89. Then, don't forget Mario's buddy Dan Quinn, who put up 94 points in 1988-89, 50% of them on the power-play. (Quinn was a talented offensive player, but rather one dimensional. In three seasons '88 to '91, he went -87. Same could be said of Rob Brown.)Wow!!!. Lemieux was unbelievable.
Look the Pens roster in 88-89 when he did 199 points in 76 games.
The Pens first power play unit was:
Lemieux
Coffey
Rob f.. Brown
Bob who Errey
Russ!!!! Taglianetti!!!
Come on man.. they had a good offence because of Mario.Bob Errey actually didn't score a PP point that entire season. And Taglianetti was with with Winnipeg in 1988-89. Then, don't forget Mario's buddy Dan Quinn, who put up 94 points in 1988-89, 50% of them on the power-play. (Quinn was a talented offensive player, but rather one dimensional. In three seasons '88 to '91, he went -87. Same could be said of Rob Brown.)
Pens in 1988-89 were strong offensively. They scored 347 goals, third in the NHL and by far the most in the East. Problem with the club was defense.
Don't think I was disputing that.Come on man.. they had a good offence because of Mario.
Staying healthy is a non-neglectable skill.Lemieux was the perfect offensive player, to me him and Orr were better than Gretzky, the difference was that Gretzky was healthier than both...
He was a force of nature. Lemieux, Forsberg, Jagr, Lindros... we just don't have guys like that anymore. Lemieux smoked, drank and f***ed, but was still stronger than almost any other player. I still can't believe a 6'4", 230 lbs guy could skate like that.
Lemieux was the perfect offensive player, to me him and Orr were better than Gretzky, the difference was that Gretzky was healthier than both...
Ovechkin fits all those criteria very nicely. Except smoking... but he makes up in the other two areas.He was a force of nature. Lemieux, Forsberg, Jagr, Lindros... we just don't have guys like that anymore. Lemieux smoked, drank and f***ed, but was still stronger than almost any other player. I still can't believe a 6'4", 230 lbs guy could skate like that.
All those stars were awesome. Gave me chills!Insane reach, and with his skill its no chance
Staying healthy is a non-neglectable skill.
You're not helping your team if you're not on the ice.
IMO, Gretzky's durability is what make him stand above the other two.
I'd change the bolded to be "difference was that Gretzky performed better than both". Because he simply did, it wasn't just about health, it's also about actually performing to the maximum of your potential, consistently every year. Health alone doesn't ensure that.
Every single regular season, he was the best scorer by a huge margin, without fail
Every single international competition, he was the best scorer by a big margin
Every single playoff - he was the best scorer, by a big margin
Consistency is through the roof.
At the end of the day, you get judged on what you did do - not what you could do. I'm a firm believer that Lemieux had it in him to top 215/92 if he had been perfectly healthy his peak years - but that's all it is, a belief. I don't believe Lemieux would have hit those numbers consistently every year, like Gretzky did. That's where Gretzky separates himself. Same for his playoff runs.
Even Orr - look at his playoffs. He has some all-time great runs, and some less ones. Gretzky was dynamite in every playoff run.
To clarify - i'm talking about peak versions here, so this is Gretzky in Edmonton.
Pittsburgh's PP was extremely good that season. After 23 GP they were officially at 32.8 %, with 2nd best team 23.0 %. Net PP% was 30.3 % with 2nd best team at 20.6. Almost twice as high as the average team.
NHL.com Stats
Mario himself had 29 PP pts, with 2nd best in league at 19 PP pts (teammates Kovalev & Tärnström, and Hossa).