HuGort
Registered User
Habs might trade our first for Rossi plus your first? I have to think about it though. We currently draft 7th. If guy we want at 7 is gone.
Value of: Marco Rossi +
- Thread starter roon
- Start date
-
Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Kirby Dach isn't playing like he is a more talented anything.
The difference between Rossi and the 7th OA is not our 1st round pick in the mid teens.
Although a very limited sample size but Dach was by far our best forward during training camp and the first game he played. Better than Suzuki even.
But let’s say that doesn’t count. Their 22 years old season had Dach (last year) with more points than Rossi (this yesr) with 13 less games played. Nevermind the fact that one is 6’4 220 and the other is 5’9 180.
I’m sorry again but you’re not getting anywhere near a top 10 pick for Rossi. Again, your best comparable is Newhook is who got a late first and early second.
- Dec 10, 2012
- 41,570
- 19,672
You don't trade Rossi for a draft pick. If you think Rossi is expendable (he isn't), trade him for a similar aged, similar caliber defenseman.
Trading Rossi is incredibly short sighted.
Trading Rossi is incredibly short sighted.
Columbus could be interested in Rossi, but probably only if they somehow end up with 6th OA or worse, and much more likely for something other than that pick anyway. But they also don't line up well with Minnesota. Columbus only has the two top defense prospects (Jiricek, Mateychuk) and no appetite to move either one. Can't really see Minnesota being interested in Columbus's farm full of ten million small wings, either. The new GM may also want to use the top-10 pick as a chance to put his own stamp on the organization more than to acquire an older player.
Now if you want to talk JEEK, Columbus is all ears no matter who they hire as GM, and that pick and more is on the table for sure.
Now if you want to talk JEEK, Columbus is all ears no matter who they hire as GM, and that pick and more is on the table for sure.
Seems to me like it’s pretty much everyone’s opinion other than yours so far.
- Dec 10, 2012
- 41,570
- 19,672
Osakahaus
Chillin' on Fuji
- May 28, 2021
- 8,518
- 4,192
well the problem is the Wild and their cap hit. Do they want Nelson, and do they believe that Wahlstrom is a good player still? He's become very meh in doses and the islanders have seemingly given up on him. Given their track record in the past with disgruntled 1st round islanders forwards, maybe don't trade Wahlstrom to them. Perhaps wahlstrom scores an overtime goal in game 7
- Dec 10, 2012
- 41,570
- 19,672
well the problem is the Wild and their cap hit. Do they want Nelson, and do they believe that Wahlstrom is a good player still? He's become very meh in doses and the islanders have seemingly given up on him. Given their track record in the past with disgruntled 1st round islanders forwards, maybe don't trade Wahlstrom to them. Perhaps wahlstrom scores an overtime goal in game 7
The problem is that's a ridiculous proposal for Rossi and the Wild would never consider it for numerous reasons
If Rossi is becoming a legitimate top 6 center at age 22, that's kind of exactly what you'd expect from the 18 year old kid you draft this year.
Looks to me like a team would be trading with the intent of skipping 3/4 years of development time, which is certainly reasonable imo. People have made that out to be an insane proposal, but I don't think I agree.
This site has always favored draft picks and mystery boxes over proven players, and like OP I've never really understood it either. I think most people here would have a completely U23 team if it were up to them, and then be dumbfounded when it struggles to succeed.
Though I can't say I've watched Minny or Rossi, so it entirely depends on what you think he is right now.
Looks to me like a team would be trading with the intent of skipping 3/4 years of development time, which is certainly reasonable imo. People have made that out to be an insane proposal, but I don't think I agree.
This site has always favored draft picks and mystery boxes over proven players, and like OP I've never really understood it either. I think most people here would have a completely U23 team if it were up to them, and then be dumbfounded when it struggles to succeed.
Though I can't say I've watched Minny or Rossi, so it entirely depends on what you think he is right now.
- Dec 10, 2012
- 41,570
- 19,672
BondraTime
Registered User
Rossi doesn’t have near that kind of value around the league.
Teams aren’t trading out of the top 5 picks knowingly.
Have to go back to what, 2002 for the last time a top 5 pick was traded leading up to the draft when it was a known pick (not including Stutzle or Byram picks that were traded years prior). That trend isn’t going to be bucked for Marco Rossi and a few odds and ends.
Teams aren’t trading out of the top 5 picks knowingly.
Have to go back to what, 2002 for the last time a top 5 pick was traded leading up to the draft when it was a known pick (not including Stutzle or Byram picks that were traded years prior). That trend isn’t going to be bucked for Marco Rossi and a few odds and ends.
- Dec 10, 2012
- 41,570
- 19,672
F depth chart was also a strength of ours when we had Granlund, Nino, Coyle, Zucker, Larsson, etc. Then it wasn't. Have some patience. Wait to see who actually meets or exceeds expectations, and who falls short. Trying to win the game before the game starts is how you lose the game.
OP is trading a 22 year old middle six C with potential for a draft pick.
If he valued defense he would trade that player for another similar aged and similar caliber defenseman.
He may want a defenseman, but he is putting the mystery box defenseman over the established forward.
Even if I may lean to agree with that, it's just a guess. Nobody has any idea what GM's would value him at. 22 year old top six center? Sounds like a draft pick this year without the 3 years of development to get there.
Wouldn't surprise me at all if there was a team out there who bit in it, no matter how unlikely some think it may be.
He can still value defense and prefer to go with a defensive prospect.
Is there any top 4, 22 year old defensemen out there that would be available? Maybe throw some names out there. This is why discussions take place.
- Dec 10, 2012
- 41,570
- 19,672
Not exactly. With a top 5 pick you're mostly looking at a building block asset. first liner center, top pairing D or elite wingers. Below average 2C at 22 is not exactly what you expect from a top 5 draft pick, sorry
Let's look at those mystery boxes since Rossi was drafted and let's see how many of them you take before Rossi:
2020:
1. Lafreniere - Yes
2. Byfield - Yes
3. Stutzle - Yes
4. Raymond - Yes
5. Sanderson - Yes
2021:
1. Powers - Yes
2. Beniers - Yes
3. McTavish - Yes
4. Hughes - Yes
5. Johnson - Debatable but I think I take Johnson although I could argue Rossi is move proven
2022:
1. Slafkovsky - Yes
2. Nemec - Yes
3. Cooley - Yes
4. Wright - No
5. Gauthier - Yes
2023:
1. Bedard - Yes
2. Carlsson - yes
3. Fantilli - Yes
4. Smith - Yes
5. Reinbacher - Yes
Those mystery boxes usually end up much, much better than a guy like Rossi would so you can understand why people would value those much more than a complimentary piece like Rossi.
Even if you value him as a top 6 center, no one is ditching out a top 5 pick for him. No one.
BondraTime
Registered User
If you’re taking an offensive C in the top 5 of the draft, the pick that is being asked to give up (not even mentioning that Center is 5’9) and he had 37 points in his D+4, you’re not very pleased with the selection, even if he’s playing in your top 6.
JiricekSaveUs
Danila Yurov Fan Club Executive Assistant
- May 2, 2018
- 19,328
- 12,289
He's also repeatedly stated that his proposal was contingent on additions to Rossi, which hasn't been addressed once.
"Looking to get into the top 5 IDEALLY".
It appears as though most people just decided Rossi isn't worth a top 5 pick, discussion over." without even trying to discuss anything.
