Dr Jan Itor
Registered User
Doesn't mean it always has to.Could be that the team’s current “3rd” line has Foligno and Trenin on it.
Doesn't mean it always has to.Could be that the team’s current “3rd” line has Foligno and Trenin on it.
you forgot Boeser! The Wild have said they have a couple players identified for Free Agency already, Boeser to Wild is about as automatic as Vanek to Wild wasThat’s fine. I don’t have a problem if they keep Rossi in the top 6. But I expect Yurov to make his way to a scoring line rather fast. Maybe they put Ek father back on the third line:
Kaprizov-Rossi-Zucc
Boldy-Yurov-Xhgren
Khusnutdinov-Eriksson Ek-Hartman
Foligno-Gaudreau-Lauko
Trenin
That’s a pretty deep forward group.
Agreed. However, Foligno/Trenin/Hartman/Gaudreau are locked in through at least the 26-27 season. A scoring 3rd line with Rossi would need to look like Khusnutdinov-Rossi-Hartman. Speed, playmaking, finishing. I like that mix.Doesn't mean it always has to.
100% view him as a target, but did not include players outside the organization. He would take Ewgren's spot if he is signed. Ehgren down to 3LW. Khusnutdinov to 4C.you forgot Boeser! The Wild have said they have a couple players identified for Free Agency already, Boeser to Wild is about as automatic as Vanek to Wild was
I don't consider Hartman to the same as the other 3, and I'd be eyeballing Ohgren or Heidt for that LW spot.Agreed. However, Foligno/Trenin/Hartman/Gaudreau are locked in through at least the 26-27 season. A scoring 3rd line with Rossi would need to look like Khusnutdinov-Rossi-Hartman. Speed, playmaking, finishing. I like that mix.
If we bridge Rossi at $5M next year and Khusnutdinov at $2M, we'll have ~$6.5M to spend depending on any overages this year, leaving ~$1M in space.100% view him as a target, but did not include players outside the organization. He would take Ewgren's spot if he is signed. Ehgren down to 3LW. Khusnutdinov to 4C.
Kap-Rossi-Zucc
Boldy-Yurov-Boeser
Yougren-Eriksson Ek-Hartman
Foligno-Khusnutdinov-Trenin
Gaudreau
It would be crazy if they signed Boeser and traded Rossi because they "couldn't afford to keep him" (or whatever they will say).
So like Heidt-Rossi-Hartman? That is good in my books. Ohgren-Rossi-Hartman might have too much of a shooter lean to it lolI don't consider Hartman to the same as the other 3, and I'd be eyeballing Ohgren or Heidt for that LW spot.
If we bridge Rossi at $5M next year and Khusnutdinov at $2M, we'll have ~$6.5M to spend depending on any overages this year, leaving ~$1M in space.
Weird that Walz would misspeak. He never does that
Wow, so Walzy doesn’t watch the games. That’s interestingWell it's hard to know if that's all it was, he also said that Zuccarello was the QB of the PP and the PP runs through Zuccarello earlier in the game
He may be making mistakes intentionally to push a team message like a subliminal propagandist, or he may just be bad at his job. Taking it a step further, it's hard to know if the refs are intentionally fixing games or are just under the belief that "game management" makes the game better overall, and sometimes fixing them accidentally as a result. And what about GMs and their weird decision making? Or the Department of Player Safety being just so random in its judgements and punishments?Well it's hard to know if that's all it was, he also said that Zuccarello was the QB of the PP and the PP runs through Zuccarello earlier in the game
He may be making mistakes intentionally to push a team message like a subliminal propagandist, or he may just be bad at his job. Taking it a step further, it's hard to know if the refs are intentionally fixing games or are just under the belief that "game management" makes the game better overall, and sometimes fixing them accidentally as a result. And what about GMs and their weird decision making? Or the Department of Player Safety being just so random in its judgements and punishments?
Instead of leaping to conspiracy theories, I think it's wiser to address the potential that it's simply incompetence and work your way up from there. Either the NHL is filled with ingenious masterminds who can slip from their true personas to another of bumbling incompetents to mask their true, nefarious intent, or they're actually mostly just jocks who got jobs from an old boys' club and are actual incompetents. I know which I believe is more likely.
Fair enough. In the context of what MrRuin said regarding Rossi, it seemed like you thought "intentionally or not" might be intentionally. That's how it came off to me, but I must have misread your intent.I didn't think I was pushing any conspiracy theories, I was just saying it's hard to know if Walz misspoke or if he meant to say what he did for whatever reason he meant it
I feel like they do run the PP through Zuccarello. Whether they should is another question.
I just see time after time, him with the puck looking for the cross-ice pass. Maybe that's not what "running through" means though.I don't see that at all. It runs through Boldy for the most part. Zuccarello is on the offside.
I just see time after time, him with the puck looking for the cross-ice pass. Maybe that's not what "running through" means though.
I see this too. I think some powerplays "run through" a focal player, usually at the point, who can see the whole zone of ice in front of him. In the Wild's case, I think it runs through the wings in an east-west fashion. Saying it doesn't run through Zuccarello is saying it doesn't run through anyone, and saying it does is saying it runs through both he and Boldy. Both are right in their own ways.I just see time after time, him with the puck looking for the cross-ice pass. Maybe that's not what "running through" means though.
I think it runs through the wings in an east-west fashion. Saying it doesn't run through Zuccarello is saying it doesn't run through anyone, and saying it does is saying it runs through both he and Boldy.