SA16
Sixstring
Im all for him dressing 42 games and splitting time with one of the kids. I also dont care about your stats.
Im all for him dressing 42 games and splitting time with one of the kids. I also dont care about your stats.
Staal was absolutely fine last season playing on the bottom pair. Guy gets so much slack for nothing.
And I still believe there's a GM out there that will take him.He posted the worst metrics of all the D who played (including Pionk) and was heavily sub replacement level.
That was not fine. He didn't spend much time on the "bottom pair" either. He had the 2nd most minutes played of all defensemen, thats a problem (he sucked almost equally against all levels of competition, so this isn't skewed by playing against top players, 4th liners chewed him up too.)
He wasn't even good before the new year, but his game absolutely tanked after January 1, like beyond any other stretch of games in his career.
It's one thing if you don't have better players, but we do.
You can only bury a million or so in Hartford. The rest counts against the big club cap. No big savings.Hey theoretically what would happen if we buried Stall, Shattenkirk AND Smith in Hartford? Is it possible?
Hey theoretically what would happen if we buried Stall, Shattenkirk AND Smith in Hartford? Is it possible?
Yea I get that and the same with Zucc, they made these choices but we also have a choice on how we refer to the bad contract. Just don't care for posters making it sound like Staal killed their first born by playing D on the Rangers. I still stand by what I said because it is true: the dude lost most of his vision in an eye, playing a game on a team we like to watch. More respect could be shown, show your displeasure in his play and contract, just don't go crazy with the insults. If I wrote what people have written about Staal to another poster I would be banned.I stand up for Staal, when needed, but you make it sound like he stormed a beach to ensure our freedom.
The guy lost his eye playing a game for a massive salary. A game he's played his entire life and worked hard so he could make it to this level and play in the NHL.
He lost his eye earning the living he chose. You make the fans sound like we're watching gladiators.
Yea I get that and the same with Zucc, they made these choices but we also have a choice on how we refer to the bad contract. Just don't care for posters making it sound like Staal killed their first born by playing D on the Rangers. I still stand by what I said because it is true: the dude lost most of his vision in an eye, playing a game on a team we like to watch. More respect could be shown, show your displeasure in his play and contract, just don't go crazy with the insults. If I wrote what people have written about Staal to another poster I would be banned.
What have you done for me lately. The amount of hate Staal and Girardi have gotten on these boards, two of the greatest D in Ranger history.
I have a puck autographed by Leetch, J Patrick, and KarpovtsevLeetch, Park, Howell, greschner, zubov, beukaboom, Lowe, L Patrick, Johnson, J Patrick, Maloney, Ruotsalaine, karpotsov just to name a few
I have a puck autographed by Leetch, J Patrick, and Karpovtsev
Thanks. I have a white lady liberty 3rd jersey signed by Malik lolThat's awesome! I have a puck signed Richter and a lundquist signed Jersey
After his injury he has zero puck handling ability, and his breakout passes leave a lot to be desired. But his gap control and in zone coverage are still pretty good. He also got back to skating up ice a little bit last year which was nice to see.
My biggest issue with Staal is just his contract. If he was on a cheap deal I would be happy having him as my 6-7 defenseman.
What does that 5.6M matter though? He has 2 years left and it's not going to prevent us from anything. We have plenty of money to sign our RFAs and then a ton of money coming off the books over the next couple years. So how is that such a big issue?
Leetch, Park, Howell, greschner, zubov, beukaboom, Lowe, L Patrick, Johnson, J Patrick, Maloney, Ruotsalaine, karpotsov Staal Girardi just to name a few
He posted the worst metrics of all the D who played (including Pionk) and was heavily sub replacement level.
That was not fine. He didn't spend much time on the "bottom pair" either. He had the 2nd most minutes played of all defensemen, thats a problem (he sucked almost equally against all levels of competition, so this isn't skewed by playing against top players, 4th liners chewed him up too.)
He wasn't even good before the new year, but his game absolutely tanked after January 1, like beyond any other stretch of games in his career.
It's one thing if you don't have better players, but we do.
Zero issue with how ur saying it here... I do think the “are u not entertained!?!?!” Aspect of ur initial post was unwarranted. We all love the NYR & some may speak on a hockey forum a little bit unjustly but that’s the internet for u. It’s the world we now live in.Yea I get that and the same with Zucc, they made these choices but we also have a choice on how we refer to the bad contract. Just don't care for posters making it sound like Staal killed their first born by playing D on the Rangers. I still stand by what I said because it is true: the dude lost most of his vision in an eye, playing a game on a team we like to watch. More respect could be shown, show your displeasure in his play and contract, just don't go crazy with the insults. If I wrote what people have written about Staal to another poster I would be banned.
Staal is still a very good PKer and good bottom-pairing defenseman
They easily were one of the worst PK pairings in the entire league, and there really isn't even a way to try to spin it positively.I could swear I remember it being nearly automatic against the PK pairing of Staal/Pionk lol