I disagree. What do you dislike about it?
You would prefer?
"This year, it's about quitting early and hoping and praying to be as bad as teams bereft of talent.
We're trading Hughes and Petey for pennies on the dollar because if we can be as unwatchable and pathetic as possible, we might have a 13 percent chance of drafting one special player.
After that, it's just another 7 years of ineptitude and good luck and maybe we'll be pretty good".
"Next season starts now".
Sure, I guess.
I don't know, but perhaps there are people creative enough to recognize the Canucks situation (no prospects, capped, their best players due soon for raises and a defence that's so poor that players coming out of college were a great improvement), demands a little creative action, along the lines of "no team has ever done something like this before".
It's like people planning? Hoping? for Bedard with a 3% lottery chance. If everything goes exactly right this team stands a chance at being mid round playoff fodder.
Not being able to correctly assess where one sits is a huge issue.
Cratering for Bedard wasn't going to happen, but that doesn't mean there weren't other options that stand a much better chance of improving the team. It's kind of weird to me how there's so much laughing about how predictable teams will act, and then folks saying with the same confidence that entertaining a different approach to team building is impossible.
If the Canucks had just a couple of those road blocks in front of them, I'd be very much in agreement with what several folks here are saying, but this particular set of circumstances demands a new and creative approach.
I don't think this will happen.
Just sharing a little levity on being a proponent of video game tactics. I guess it's video game tactics VS sticks in the mud. lol