Lust for Life
Registered User
- Jun 30, 2018
- 874
- 1,360
If you don’t go by pure stat lines you can reshuffle these top all time lists forever. You could drop Roy and say he was on stacked teams, drop Brodeur since he benefited from the trap and dead puck era, move Hasek and Lundqvist up since they dragged pretty trash teams to the cup finals, move Jim Carey up for having one of the highest save pcts in the 80s![]()
Muzz has those two rings because of a really stacked team whom kept the shots down.
That 2nd cup he only played 11 games, Fleury got them through the tougher matchups early on.
That 1 year outlier 2 cups in his rookie year is his whole legacy.
He should sign a 1 game contract next year and pull a Brad TolliverI'm sad he never got his goal or his fight.
And Flopper’s is a Lidstrom shot away from going 0-3 in the Final as a starter.Muzz has those two rings because of a really stacked team whom kept the shots down.
That 2nd cup he only played 11 games, Fleury got them through the tougher matchups early on.
That 1 year outlier 2 cups in his rookie year is his whole legacy.
I would watch an hockey-based action movie starting MAF.He should sign a 1 game contract next year and pull a Brad Tolliver
![]()
That only ties the game.And Flopper’s is a Lidstrom shot away from going 0-3 in the Final as a starter.
He would’ve folded in OT, just like he usually did.That only ties the game.
![]()
Luckily, he ruined all of his detractor's time....He would’ve folded in OT, just like he usually did.
Top 5 of his era is a much better and fairer discussion, because then you can discuss things like team structure and scoring and coaching, as well as longevity and such. I don’t agree that he’s top 5 if his era, but I think there’s a good argument for him there to be made.MAF was the victim of some poor goalie coach hires. When they tried to change his game, it screwed him up big time. It was the Mike Bales hire that brought him back to his old self. Him losing his job to Vokoun is much more of an indictment on who they brought in to change him, than it is on MAF.
I agree that he probably isn’t top 5 all time (mostly because of those few years), but to say he isn’t top 5 of his era is insanity. Most people here just are much harder on him because that lull in his game because of coaching, probably cost us a Cup or 2.
I've always said that it's no coincidence the MAF's worst years were all when DB was the head coach. Once DF was fired, he bounced back and won two more Cups, got Vegas to the SCF and won the Vezina.MAF was the victim of some poor goalie coach hires. When they tried to change his game, it screwed him up big time. It was the Mike Bales hire that brought him back to his old self. Him losing his job to Vokoun is much more of an indictment on who they brought in to change him, than it is on MAF.
I agree that he probably isn’t top 5 all time (mostly because of those few years), but to say he isn’t top 5 of his era is insanity. Most people here just are much harder on him because that lull in his game because of coaching, probably cost us a Cup or 2.
You want to have a nuanced conversation instead of taking a hard line stance and dying on that hill no matter what? That’s not how we do things around here.There are so many tremendous topics where multiple things can be true, but the internet has really ruined good conversation in favor of NO.. I AM RIGHT!
Multiple things can be true:
- Amazing career and judging by NHL standards, he's an easy shoe-in for HOF
- He struggled in the playoffs at times and was not a clutch goalie
- Those struggles still do not take away the work he did in 09 and 17. Or even 2008/20whatever w/ Vegas to get to the Finals and lose.
From all accounts he was a great locker room guy and a great charitable man. At one point, he and Niemi had the worst save percentage in the new era playoffs. However he made it work in 09 and parts of 17.
This thread could be so awesome debating the good and bad of MAF, but instead we have to go into definitive statements right from the jump. Why not analyze some stuff and then form an opinion even if you agree/disagree with others?