MacKinnon has 150 points in his last 82 games

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
26,473
6,203
Visit site
McDavid is currently on the Crosby/Jagr tier but he’s also on pace to surpass their individual career achievements, whether we’re talking stats or hardware. MacKinnon is not on pace to equal them, let alone surpass them. For Mack it’s really more a matter of his peaking at a similar level. McDavid has both the peak and the consistency, which is a mark of a player who can challenge the Big 4. Maybe he doesn’t quite make it there, but he has the potential, and he’s definitely set to land in the all time top 10.

McDavid's peak level of play is on their tier. MacKinnon had one season that was on that tier. I don't see how you can argue that MacKinnon would be challenging prime Jagr/Crosby for best player when they would normally be beating him year and year out.
 

Toby91ca

Registered User
Oct 17, 2022
2,491
1,832
Best player in the league
I might agree....certainly fun to watch, but McDavid is fun to watch as well in a similar way. I'll be honest, Kucherov isn't as fun to watch, not as explosive, but that doesn't mean he's not up there as well.

So, while I agree MacKinnon has been right there with McDavid the last 2 or 3 years, that's not enough to suggest McDavid shouldn't up on another tier....he is, it's that simple. Doesn't mean he'll be better than MacKinnon for the rest of his career either, but he's done so much already, he's put himself at a level above. MacKinnon is way better than Crosby right now, but that doesn't mean Crosby shouldn't be at a higher level for career....not a fair comparison of course as Crosby is much older and MacKinnon and McDavid are closer to the same age.

It's interesting though, McDavid's significant separation (in my mind) could be a lot to do with him simply being a star player as soon as he hit the ice in his rookie season while it has taken MacKinnon a lot longer to develop into what he is now. I'd place McDavid above MacKinnon on an all-time list very easily and he'd be so many places higher.....but you might not see that having just looked at the last few years....but that's the thing, McDavid had so many better seasons in the years before that vs. MacKinnon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tarheelhockey

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
86,516
143,534
Bojangles Parking Lot
McDavid's peak level of play is on their tier. MacKinnon had one season that was on that tier. I don't see how you can argue that MacKinnon would be challenging prime Jagr/Crosby for best player when they would normally be beating him year and year out.

Snippets of the conversation that got us here:

“It’s his bad luck that he happened to come into the league at around the same time as McDavid. There was a long stretch of years where anyone putting up this kind of offensive performance would have stood out as the top scoring threat in the world.”

“there were also some years in the late 60s, late 70s, late 90s, early 00s, and mid 10s where he’d have been right in the conversation with guys like Lafleur and Jagr and Crosby. I think of Sakic‘s crazy peak in 2001, MacKinnon has been around that level recently.”

“Same with MacKinnon, this run would need to look more like 500 games rather than 82 games before we start entertaining him as the equal to a McDavid.”

That is, the way MacKinnon is playing right now (82-game pace in the 120-150 range depending on what year it is) would definitely challenge a prime Crosby or Jagr. That’s not to say he’s on their level if we are looking at extended periods of performance, just the brief window this OP is talking about.
 

avsfan2189

Registered User
Jun 22, 2019
108
91
what people don't realize is that Mack is definitely on Jagr and Crosby tier right now but isn't regarded due to his lack of full seasons played each year.

take a look. If he had played 82 games the last 10 years he'd be looking at having had 7-8 100+ point seasons. Crosby's only had 6 (yes you could use the same argument about lack of 82 games played per season) but the point is that yes then they are on that same tier.

Mcdavid's had 7 100 point seasons, Jagr with 5, Ovie with 4.

starting from Mcdavid's sophomore year vs Mack's breakout year in 17-18:

Mack: 1.31 ppg = 107 points over 82
Mcdavid: 1.32 = 108 points in 82

18-19'
Mack: 99 pts in 82 games
Mcdavid: 1.32 = 116 in 78 gms

19-20'
Mack: 1.35 ppg = 111 points over 82 gms
Mcdavid: 1.52 = 124 points over 78 gms

20-21'
Mack: 1.35 ppg = 111 points over 82 gms again
Mcdavid: 1.88 ppg = 154 points over 82 gms

21-22
Mack: 1.35 ppg = 111 points over 82 gms again for the THIRD year in a row
Mcdavid: 123 points in 80 gms

22-23
Mack: 1.56 ppg = 128 pts over 82 gms
Mcdavid: 153 points in 82 gms

23-24'
Mack: 140 points in 82 gms
Mcdavid: 1.74 ppg for 142 points over 82 gms

currently:
Mack: 1.92 ppg = 158 pts over 82gms
Mcdavid: 1.0 ppg = 82 pts over 82 gms

so that's 3 straight years of a 111 point pace THEN the year after a 128 point pace and THEN a 140 point pace and now a 158 point pace. That's 6 straight years of 100+ paces. The guy's earned his inclusion on this tier.

clearly there are years where Mcdavid is far above Mack but he aint slouching and shows he's on the crosby and jagr tier.
 
Last edited:

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
26,473
6,203
Visit site
That is, the way MacKinnon is playing right now (82-game pace in the 120-150 range depending on what year it is) would definitely challenge a prime Crosby or Jagr. That’s not to say he’s on their level if we are looking at extended periods of performance, just the brief window this OP is talking about.

Let's go with his last 82 regular season games:


PPG - 1.83

Kucherov - 1.79
McDavid - 1.76
Panarin - 1.44
Kaprizov - 1.42
Draisaitl - 1.32
Rantanen - 1.28
Makar - 1.26
Matthews - 1.25
Marner 1.24


Jagr's best 82 game stretch:


PPG - 1.79

Sakic 1.32
Selanne 1.26
Lindros 1.24
Forsberg 1.23
Fleury 1.22


Crosby's best 82 game stretch:


PPG 1.70

Malkin 1.25
Stamkos 1.15
St. Louis 1.12
Sedin 1.06
Giroux 1.06
Sedin 1.05
 

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
26,473
6,203
Visit site
take a look. If he had played 82 games the last 10 years he'd be looking at having had 7-8 100+ point seasons. Crosby's only had 6 (yes you could use the same argument about lack of 82 games played per season) but the point is that yes then they are on that same tier.

So why don't you make that argument??
 

D Wakaluk

Registered User
Dec 8, 2010
1,867
3,364
stuck in the '90s
Any geezers remember Duke 3D? Using the steroids item (+200% speed)?

That's what watching MacKinnon feels like. Guy's a beast

Tbh he feels more like a gamebreaker than McGod in his current form
 
  • Like
Reactions: Video Nasty

avsfan2189

Registered User
Jun 22, 2019
108
91
So why don't you make that argument??

because Crosby is already on his own tier, the argument is that Mack can be on that tier. I also mention at the end of that sentence part that the point is that they should be on the same tier.

the shortcut way is just career ppg and Mack is at 1.15 pg vs Crosby 1.25 ppg
 
Last edited:

Video Nasty

Registered User
Mar 12, 2017
5,627
9,803
I’m beginning to wonder when MacKinnon gets serious consideration as the best Nordique/Avalanche forward ever? Is he already there at this point for Avalanche fans?
 

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
86,516
143,534
Bojangles Parking Lot
Let's go with his last 82 regular season games:


PPG - 1.83

Kucherov - 1.79
McDavid - 1.76
Panarin - 1.44
Kaprizov - 1.42
Draisaitl - 1.32
Rantanen - 1.28
Makar - 1.26
Matthews - 1.25
Marner 1.24


Jagr's best 82 game stretch:


PPG - 1.79

Sakic 1.32
Selanne 1.26
Lindros 1.24
Forsberg 1.23
Fleury 1.22


Crosby's best 82 game stretch:


PPG 1.70

Malkin 1.25
Stamkos 1.15
St. Louis 1.12
Sedin 1.06
Giroux 1.06
Sedin 1.05


I’m honestly not sure what you’re inferring from these numbers.

It looks pretty clear that during their respective best 82-game stretches, Jagr/Crosby/MacKinnon all established a huge gap between themselves and the “pack”.

The difference for MacKinnon is that at the same time as his crazy run, there were also two other top-tier superstars who were similarly on fire and creating a huge gap between themselves and the pack. Thus my original comment: “It’s his bad luck that he happened to come into the league at around the same time as McDavid [and Kucherov]. There was a stretch of years where anyone putting up this kind of offensive performance would have stood out as the top scoring threat in the world.“

The numbers you posted show exactly what I meant by that. Apologies if you were posting the numbers as a form of agreement, I’m just not sure how to read them.
 

Jixer19

Registered User
Dec 19, 2015
1,122
1,024
Edmonton, Alberta
I’m talking about on ice play. His past eight seasons seem to be beyond what Sakic and Forsberg were able to cobble together.
I am only one Avs fan, but I would slot MacK third behind those two. Sakic is the top and Forsberg is always the what if factor of health, he was a beast when he was able to play, especially playoff time (which all 3 are known for, Sakic being Mr Clutch himself). Now will that change in the future? Who knows for sure, if MacK keeps this up and gets another cup or two, he could become 2nd, hard to top Sakic, just cause he has cups as a Captain and one as a GM now
 
  • Like
Reactions: Video Nasty

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
26,473
6,203
Visit site
I’m honestly not sure what you’re inferring from these numbers.

It looks pretty clear that during their respective best 82-game stretches, Jagr/Crosby/MacKinnon all established a huge gap between themselves and the “pack”.

The difference for MacKinnon is that at the same time as his crazy run, there were also two other top-tier superstars who were similarly on fire and creating a huge gap between themselves and the pack. Thus my original comment: “It’s his bad luck that he happened to come into the league at around the same time as McDavid [and Kucherov]. There was a stretch of years where anyone putting up this kind of offensive performance would have stood out as the top scoring threat in the world.“

The numbers you posted show exactly what I meant by that. Apologies if you were posting the numbers as a form of agreement, I’m just not sure how to read them.

I am saying that he wouldn't stand out anymore than he is now against Jagr or Crosby. At best, he would share the "top scoring threat" label with those two as he currently sharing that with McDavid and Kucherov.

What he is doing perhaps takes some of the shine off of McDavid's peak, if you thought that he was doing things that were above Crosby and Jagr.
 

Video Nasty

Registered User
Mar 12, 2017
5,627
9,803
I am saying that he wouldn't stand out anymore than he is now against Jagr or Crosby. At best, he would share the "top scoring threat" label with those two as he currently sharing that with McDavid and Kucherov.

What he is doing perhaps takes some of the shine off of McDavid's peak, if you thought that he was doing things that were above Crosby and Jagr.

Can we stop pretending that Crosby had even one season that topped any of Jagr’s five best?
 

Crow

Registered User
May 19, 2014
4,475
3,314
So yet another one of these threads where people add games from last year to a “streak” or equate it to a whole actual year to pump their tires. Strange.He has been playing great hockey and won a hart. Happy for him.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad