- Jan 30, 2016
- 1,429
- 683
Except Laine.
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt.
Except Laine.
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt.
What do you base this statement on?The truth hurts. No need to get so sensitive. Laine is a tier below both Matthews and Pool Party.
The truth hurts. No need to get so sensitive. Laine is a tier below both Matthews and Pool Party.
The truth hurts. No need to get so sensitive. Laine is a tier below both Matthews and Pool Party.
At least Babcock doesn't see it that way since he already said that it's Matthews or Laine.
I guess one guy just showed us what he's been up to in here.
The truth hurts. No need to get so sensitive. Laine is a tier below both Matthews and Pool Party.
I wish there was a like button in this forum.Nice one Rob.
He's a winger, has played both sides this year and last year. I think most tend to list guys who play both sides by their which way they shoot. But yes, try to undermine Central scouting and TSN's ranking, considering Bob McKenzie's list is based off scouts he talks to, and not which position he thinks players play...NHL Central Scouting has Laine listed as RW... TSN's info graphic has Laine listed as RW...
We realize that these are the guys that we are listening to with their talk about "consensus #2 pick", right? This is the authority who we assume is knowledgeable about the players, right? The argument is that these people scout hockey players for a living, right?
But they couldn't scout that Laine is a left wing?
He's a winger, has played both sides this year and last year. I think most tend to list guys who play both sides by their which way they shoot. But yes, try to undermine Central scouting and TSN's ranking, considering Bob McKenzie's list is based off scouts he talks to, and not which position he thinks players play...
He's played on the left at the WHC, and did last year at the U-18's. But keep trying to discredit people because you disagree with their assessment. I know he played on the LW for Tappara, and was used their primarily on the PP at the WHC. It should flat out just say W.He was LW in his Liiga team. If you actually SCOUTED him instead of looking at the stat sheets, you wouldn't have that opinion.
I have compiled a highlight video from his WC's first 3 and half games thus far. I watched through the first 3 games' highlights. Ignoring the middle of the ice, guess how many offensive highlights he has made from each side while playing as the RIGHT winger, ignoring power play?
Left:
10
Right:
5
This is while playing as the RIGHT winger, while spending the vast majority of time on the RIGHT wing.
If they actually list wingers by the side they shoot on instead of by the side they play on, I have no words for the amount of stupid that is. If they think that he can play both wings, they haven't done much scouting. Every time he "accidentally" drifts to the left, he becomes twice as good of a player.
. It should probably just be listed as LW/RW.
]
Laine's a beauty. Matthews is a beauty. "You can't go wrong with either" never applied more. Can't we all just get along?
Agreed. The top 3 this year all look great.
Except Laine.
Matthews and Laine are in a class of their own.
Puljujarvi is good but he's not Matthews/Laine good.
Ovie's had fantasy eligibility on the right side for awhile, and actually played there quite a bit under Oates. Remember, he somehow got voted to an end of season all star team at both positions. Here's an article on it if you don't rememberWhy not just list him LW as he is not as effective right winger. Why is Ovie not listed as RW then? Ar all left wingers for that matter.
Ovie's had fantasy eligibility on the right side for awhile, and actually played there quite a bit under Oates. Remember, he somehow got voted to an end of season all star team at both positions. Here's an article on it if you don't remember
]
Why not just list him LW as he is not as effective right winger. Why is Ovie not listed as RW then? Ar all left wingers for that matter.
Laine played the entire Liiga season on LW.Ovechkin was listed as RW for some time. When he played that position.
Joukkue Tappara
Pelipaikka Vasen laitahyökkääjä
Syntynyt 19.4.1998
Ikä 18
Pituus 193
Paino 95
Maila R
Team Tappara
Position Left Wing
Born 19.4.1998
Age 18
Length 193
Weight 95
Handedness R
He's played on the left at the WHC, and did last year at the U-18's. But keep trying to discredit people because you disagree with their assessment. I know he played on the LW for Tappara, and was used their primarily on the PP at the WHC. It should flat out just say W.
Just stop it. Last year Laine was exclusively a LW. Not a single game as an RW, and still these clowns were listing Laine as a RW, and telling it's AINEC. Liiga & Liiga PO, EHT, CHL, U20, pre-season games. Not a single game as an RW since the last summer.
That was until WHC, where Laine was every time listed to be 1. line (Barkov line, the real 1. line) LW, and yet Jokinen as an older player forced him to play at RW. In the first games Laine constantly went to LW position in face offs, and big star Jokinen then told the rookie to get off and go to the RW position.
Also during all the WHC games that LW-listed but forced-RW Laine "accidentally" switched to LW during shifts. Most of his good plays (and points) on 5-on-5 he made *after* he "accidentally" switched to the left, including his first goal that's one of the sickest goal I have ever seen on WHC.