pierre gagnon*
Registered User
Laine and Werenski are the leader's for rookie of the year and Laine will be the pick as offense usually wins the votes at this rate
Wow. Kid plays 14 games and now he's Lemieuex. Holy **** lmao
The pace at which he is able to adapt and progress is really something special. I mean McDavid was practically flawless since his first shift, but who have we seen something like this from? He's outproducing every goal scorer in the league at 18, while still having some kinks to work out in his game. That to me screams HIGH ceiling. Maybe the Lemieux comparisons weren't that far fetched after all.
Uhhh no?
You cant really be so out of Laine discussion to not havent heard that he has been compared to lemieux in wjc and fel time by pro hockey people, so dont pretend you havent heard about it
Ray Ferraro TSN Analyst.Got a source? Outside of Finnish fans, I have literally seen 0 such reports, let alone dozens. Fast and loose with the facts, presidential style.
He’s almost 6-5 and his reach is Mario [Lemieux]-like. When he puts his body between you and the puck and extends his arms, you’re seven feet away from the puck. It’s impossible to take the puck from him. I’ll say this: He really won me over at the worlds.”
“Right now Laine is better, all offence, he’s an artist kind of guy … He skates like (Mario) Lemieux,
Well maybe Toronto media thought that Laine is a wildcard but a few dozen experts said Laine = Lemieux.
Not such a wildcard when you think about it.
Ray Ferraro TSN Analyst.
http://www.tsn.ca/towering-laine-possesses-a-powerful-confidence-1.500870
Janne Niinimaa 741 NHL games.
http://edmontonjournal.com/sports/h...-a-huge-fan-of-laine-and-puljujarvi-for-draft
This has been well reported, and it is relatively old news. Not sure how anyone missed it.
I had to log in just to make this comment =
![]()
![]()
Too bad I am on my phone but on the top of my head here are some names that said Laine = Lemieux.
Hull, Chelios, Mckenzie drafting, Larionov, Mogilny, Selanne, Kurri, Lehtinen, Numminen etc.etc.
Too bad I am on my phone but on the top of my head here are some names that said Laine = Lemieux.
Hull, Chelios, Mckenzie drafting, Larionov, Mogilny, Selanne, Kurri, Lehtinen, Numminen etc.etc.
No they were not. Im sure Toronto media wants to play it that way but those guys said Laine=Lemieux. They did not say anything about style comparisons.
Finally I can talk about this kids potential and level realistically and not having to tone it down just to avoid hordes of people calling me an idiot.
What a game yesterday. I missed some parts of it, but from the beginning Laine was doing everything right. Every pass to his teammates (I think I saw one missed on a PP in the 3rd or something), always made the right and mature choices with the puck. He blocked shots, he blocked passes, cleared the crease, got it out of their zone. And of course did what he does, score a bunch of goals. On top of that he hits hard and often.
Nobody should have a problem with the name Lemieux thrown around in here anymore. Or the term "generational". His 11 goals in 14 games including 2 hat tricks is just that, generational.
Yes they did, don't make them into ceiling comments.
This season has been so ****ing fun. Matthews 4 goal night and now Laine with 2 hat tricks.
I would ****ing love to have Marner and Laine on a line.
Mogilny(Some random nobody who scored only 76 goals in a season) said something along the lines of:
"And how well does he play! He's like young Mario Lemieux. And it's completely true! He's simply good. Hopefully he stays healthy. He has a good future."
It's not a stylistic comparison. The focus is on how -good- Laine is.
I think it's just best let Patrik Laine be Patrik Laine without any comparisons, stylistical or any other kind. Far fetched or not. They strictly speaking do not add much real content to discussions. History is unrepeatable, changes in game are permanent era after era. Player individuals personalities every each. Their teams and linemates variable.
Comparisons often lead to misconceptions about history and reality that do not or didn't exist at all. Nobody can ever repeat anything just like some precedessor once did, maybe in totally different kind micro and macro level circumstances.
A process where careless labeling of some thing with a name-sticker can create collective perception error via thus born stagnated, dogmatic concepts that prevent to see the reality itself is continuously revisiting names of things.
Everyone fall prone to that error. Sure.
Laine made some ridiculously good passes last game. If his teammates could finish he likely wouldn't have only 5 assists for the season thus far.
The passes that really stood out for me in this video were at 0:24, 2:07, 2:35(ESPECIALLY, see the slow-mo afterwards), 6:40 and of course 7:44:
That's some pretty good playmaking for a selfish and one-dimensional goal-scoring winger.
Just imagine Laine's point totals if he was playing with a clone of himself, both Laines centered by Scheifele.
The passes that really stood out for me in this video were at 0:24, 2:07, 2:35(ESPECIALLY, see the slow-mo afterwards), 6:40 and of course 7:44: