It is a major factor when discussing teenage top 60 picks and not role playing seniors.The fact that you think PPG is a determining factor pretty much ends the conversation.
I'm very against the hope/hype/temptation of hoping he can step in this year, in any role. Too many shades of Robertson, putting weight on a kid to early, which then spirals into expectation in camp...I don’t think Knies’ is doomed by playing pro hockey next year, but I do think it’s much more likely that he’s not ready for a big role in the pros than it is that he’s outgrown the NCAA. It’s up to Dubas, but I don’t get why you’d take that risk personally.
The risk is that moving a very young man around will mess with his development. If he is not going to be on the Leafs, and playing in their top 9, then why not keep him in a place that has proven to be good with his development, rather than uproot him yet again? Why take the chance? Stability is something you want for young players- they have enough on their plate dealing with the changes maturing puts on you.I'm very against the hope/hype/temptation of hoping he can step in this year, in any role. Too many shades of Robertson, putting weight on a kid to early, which then spirals into expectation in camp...
But a 22 start ELC with a PTO to the Marlies for the rest of this year... and a mutually understood plan that he'll be a Marlie next year unless he grabs a top 9 spot by the throat and won't let go... I don't see the risk. He's a big U21 that will play the entire season at 20. He looked liked he belonged alongside the likes of Agostino and Miele, who are not only AHLers but high high end ones. Less ready prospects make the jump from the CHL every year and thrive.
Don't see it happening. I would be shocked if he doesn't sign next week. You can argue all you want about the best place for his development, but the Leafs have a good track record of developing and not rushing their prospects under Dubas. But more importantly, the longer you wait on these NCAA guys, the greater the risk that they become UFA's similar to McBain. If you have a chance to sign him now, you do it.I think Toronto signs him 12 months from now. Gives him another year to dominate the collegiate level. He still doesn’t know how to use all of his considerable physical gifts, keeping him in a stable environment at the U of M will be best for his development. He can be a Hobey Baker candidate next year and learn how to be a leader for what promises to be a stacked Gophers team
I’d tend to agree with the people who have followed him closely his freshman year. He’s way too good to make it to UFA status, I think one more year is the way. Sending a guy who isn’t quite ready to the pressure cooker that is the Leafs organization seems like a bad idea. If you give him 12 months, you have a player ready to walk on and be a difference maker.Don't see it happening. I would be shocked if he doesn't sign next week. You can argue all you want about the best place for his development, but the Leafs have a good track record of developing and not rushing their prospects under Dubas. But more importantly, the longer you wait on these NCAA guys, the greater the risk that they become UFA's similar to McBain. If you have a chance to sign him now, you do it.
History shows that that risk is very small. Every hockey player makes similar moves multiple times in their careers- at a younger age and with less support.The risk is that moving a very young man around will mess with his development. If he is not going to be on the Leafs, and playing in their top 9, then why not keep him in a place that has proven to be good with his development, rather than uproot him yet again? Why take the chance? Stability is something you want for young players- they have enough on their plate dealing with the changes maturing puts on you.
What history are you looking at?History shows that that risk is very small. Every hockey player makes similar moves multiple times in their careers- at a younger age and with less support.
That risk was much higher when he left Phoenix at 17 (to live in Nebraska, likely with a billet), and then again when he left Nebraska at 19. In all three cases the move is justified by the development gain of having the player play against the best possible competition available to them that they can still be successful at.
Hell in, the space of like 3 months he was "uprooted" twice to live out of a suitcase and travel to foreign countries? Were those opportunities good for his development or should he have declined to favour stability?
Never seen this much hype for a guy 59th in NCAA scoring
Right?
I went back to 2005-06 to see Draft+1 19 year olds in college
![]()
Elite Prospects - NCAA Stats All-time season
All-time/historical regular season stats and leaders per season for NCAA, including top goal scorers, most games played, PPG leaders and more.www.eliteprospects.com
Knies was 23rd in scoring.
If fans need an example to temper expectations, look at Dylan Holloway. That guy had 1.5ppg at Wisconsin and is currently struggling to score in the AHL
There are very very very few examples of guys on that list who jumped to the NHL at 20 successfully
To your point, there is no risk associated with him going back to MIN. It's the safest play.The risk is that moving a very young man around will mess with his development. If he is not going to be on the Leafs, and playing in their top 9, then why not keep him in a place that has proven to be good with his development, rather than uproot him yet again? Why take the chance? Stability is something you want for young players- they have enough on their plate dealing with the changes maturing puts on you.
Right?
I went back to 2005-06 to see Draft+1 19 year olds in college
![]()
Elite Prospects - NCAA Stats All-time season
All-time/historical regular season stats and leaders per season for NCAA, including top goal scorers, most games played, PPG leaders and more.www.eliteprospects.com
Knies was 23rd in scoring.
If fans need an example to temper expectations, look at Dylan Holloway. That guy had 1.5ppg at Wisconsin and is currently struggling to score in the AHL
There are very very very few examples of guys on that list who jumped to the NHL at 20 successfully
AHL at 20? Or all players being "uprooted" while younger and into less favourable situations, most often multiple times?What history are you looking at?
AHL at 20? Or all players being "uprooted" while younger and into less favourable situations, most often multiple times?
Never seen this much hype for a guy 59th in NCAA scoring
Maybe he can be as good as Marchment ..
Like it’s been said , it’s crazy how much hype this kid is getting.
I mean, even the experts are saying how good he's looked, so it's not just fan hype. They've seen him play, you probably haven't I'm guessing. Neither have I, outside of highlights. His stats may not be elite just yet, but it sounds like all the tools are there. The size, the scoring ability, the skating etc. A legit power forward prospect.Right?
I went back to 2005-06 to see Draft+1 19 year olds in college
![]()
Elite Prospects - NCAA Stats All-time season
All-time/historical regular season stats and leaders per season for NCAA, including top goal scorers, most games played, PPG leaders and more.www.eliteprospects.com
Knies was 23rd in scoring.
If fans need an example to temper expectations, look at Dylan Holloway. That guy had 1.5ppg at Wisconsin and is currently struggling to score in the AHL
There are very very very few examples of guys on that list who jumped to the NHL at 20 successfully
It's cause who drafted him... most other teams there would be very minimal talk of him. And that's no disrespect to Leafs and it's fans and Canadian media... there are just alot of Leaf fans on here and around!!
He's no Tyler Boucher, that's for sure.The new Matt Frattin.