Is that all you have to say?
And yes 6 in 4 is better than 6 in 7. Let's just wait if he scores more..
And they also had equal amount of points (5) in WHC-17 as an 16 years old.
Yes it is, for now anyways.
Is that all you have to say?
And yes 6 in 4 is better than 6 in 7. Let's just wait if he scores more..
And they also had equal amount of points (5) in WHC-17 as an 16 years old.
Vesailen and Virtanen.
I can almost taste the sweet busting duo.
Says so,someone who has Mathew Barzal as a screen name
ha ! ha ! ha !
Says so,someone who has Mathew Barzal as a screen name
ha ! ha ! ha !
I haven't dropped him out of my top 10 all year. He leaves me speechless every time I watch him.
Bold claim: Vesalainen is the most talented player in the draft.
There is a rumour that he have contract with HPK about next season, but its just a rumour.There was just an interview where he said that Frölunda didn't give a **** about him. They didn't talk to him or play him. I think his weak season makes more sense now.
Funny how this is coming from a guy who actually bashed Finnish junior development and said that it's way better to be in Sweden. I hope he comes home next season, or goes to AHL.
Perhaps, but we who have actually watched his gameplay have seen that it's not just some scoring.
There was just an interview where he said that Frölunda didn't give a **** about him. They didn't talk to him or play him. I think his weak season makes more sense now.
Funny how this is coming from a guy who actually bashed Finnish junior development and said that it's way better to be in Sweden. I hope he comes home next season, or goes to AHL.
You who have actually watched his gameplay also should have seen that one of his three goals vs. Canada was into the empty net and the other was a shot into traffic that got deflected and poked around and eventually ended up in the net. Not all goals are created equal, hence watching the player is extremely important and goals and points don't tell the whole story.
Now don't look at me as another "Vesalainen hater." He's one of my favourite players in the draft. I just won't move him to No. 3 on my list or call him the best player in the draft because he does have some obvious concerns.
Vesalainen is now third on our draft list - he's doing what he needed to do at the U18 -
show his offensive upside. As one NHL scout told me..he's found his hands:
https://recrutes.ca/kristian-vesalainen-hat-trick-vs-canada-apr-18-2017/
Vesalainen is now third on our draft list - he's doing what he needed to do at the U18 -
show his offensive upside. As one NHL scout told me..he's found his hands:
https://recrutes.ca/kristian-vesalainen-hat-trick-vs-canada-apr-18-2017/
It's what happens when the vast majority doesn't understand what his age is and that he's playing vs adults unlike the vast majority of NA players, which sometimes just doesn't allow for a dominant performance even if you are better than the peers in your age group.
For some perspective, Vesalainen being 3 and half months older:
Matthews:
At the age of u17:
4+4=8 in 6 gp at u-17s
5+2=7 in 7 gp at u-18s
At the age of u18:
1+2=3 in 5 gp at u-20s
8+7=15 in 7 gp at u-18s
Vesalainen:
At the age of u17:
4+4=8 in 5 gp at u-17s
2+4=6 in 7 gp at u-18s
At the age of u18:
1+1=2 in 6 gp at u-20s
6+5=11 in 4 gp at u-18s
So while he's 3 and half months older than Matthews for this comparison, their international production actually is very comparable. And as such, talking of Vesalainen as an early second rounder is ridiculous.
Now do Teemu Pulkkinen
Now do Teemu Pulkkinen
You're saying that like Pettersson is some kind of a scrub... he is a top 10 talent. Vesalainen is top 15 in my opinion.Vesalainen isnt even better than Elias Pettersson.
One full season >>> short tournament
For all saying his U18 performance doesn't matter because Pulkkinen and Rajala both busted, here's top 10 scorers in the u18 in order: Kucherov, Rajala, Ovechkin, Grigorenko, Kessel, W. Nylander, Zakharov, Kovalchuk, Pulkkinen, Matthews. Rajala, Zakharov and Pulkkinen were all later round picks so they weren't seen as high of prospects to begin with. Grigorenko is the only one there who could suggest u18 don't matter in Vesalainen's case, however there are 6 other who have been "pretty" good in the NHL too. Your argument is laughable for the tournament not suggesting anything when it comes to top tier prospects.