Martin + 2nd sounds good to me.
Oh no doubt. He's incredible at his role and he was amazing in that series.
But I can still see why Leafs fans are hesitant with this trade knowing Babcock's tendencies. Regardless of how effective he is, those are still minutes being eaten up on a team with some very good players.
We traded a 2nd last season for Boyle....who walked. I would do Martin+2nd for Glendenning.Doubt it sounds good to Leafs fans though.
I doubt that Glendening gets a 2nd. I'm pretty sure that was the Wings asking price but I think they'll end up with a 3rd or 4th and something to sweeten the deal a bit. We'll see though.I'm still skeptical the Leafs will pay the Wings asking price for Glendening. I'm guessing if a deal does get done it will be something like Glendening for Martin + 18 2nd + 19 3rd. Glendening for a 2nd and a 3rd to dump Martin
We traded a 2nd last season for Boyle....who walked. I would do Martin+2nd for Glendenning.
We traded a 2nd last season for Boyle....who walked. I would do Martin+2nd for Glendenning.
I doubt that Glendening gets a 2nd. I'm pretty sure that was the Wings asking price but I think they'll end up with a 3rd or 4th and something to sweeten the deal a bit. We'll see though.
Would be pretty sweet if they retained 300k to make it a even 1.5 million (or more), even if we had to sweeten the pot alittle more.
I do believe aaltonen will be given 3rd line centre chance next year with Johnnson and Kapanen as line mates. So your saving a lot on that line. Unless tavares changes everything
Let's take it with a grain of salt since friedman is a glorified hack
Would a 5th round pick be enough to get Detroit to keep Glendenning? ... Ok, I'll go as high as a 3rd. You're a tough negotiator.
Seriously though, if the Leafs trade for Glendenning there had better be salary retained. 3 seasons after this one at 1.8 is a joke for a 4th liner.
If we could do that, then great. But getting a useful 4C while unloading Martin (who isn't and won't be playing) is worth a 2nd to me....same as Boyle last season.a 2nd is pretty steep pick, id like to add another contract from us in this deal as well. Maybe moore? or maybe marincin? get more $ and contracts off the books
Fair enough.The Wings have no reason to back down from their asking price. We know that it is the Leafs that have inquired about Glendening and that the Wings responded they won't trade him cheaply and are happy to keep him.
Maybe the Wings don't want those players??? No reason to settle just to "call it a day". We are happy to keep Glenny.This little dance seems so long and drawn out for a 4th line guy.
Just do Leivo and a 3rd and call it a day, or Maybe Moore and a 3rd since Moore is the one losing his spot
IlWhats the scoop on guys like Rasanen and Grundstrom? I could see one of those guys with a later pick being part of the deal as well if the Leafs dont want to give up a second this year.
I'd say Moore + 3rd, maybe the pick is conditional to become a 2nd if we win a playoff round or two?
Babcock doesnt use 4th line against top line. That would be crazy, it's usually kadri or straight up power v power. defensive face off, pk and protecting leads yeah that I could see. There is no way he would use this guy against other teams top line. 20 mins ice time for the 4th line not gonna happen.classic babcock kind of player that he usually has on his roster. defensive minded C that matches up against opposing top lines. good FO% dont expect more than 15-20 pts/82 games. also tends to get overplayed a bit
Maybe he wants him so he can use him against other teams 1st line? He's used Glenny as a top line shut down role before, no reason to think he won't again. Fact is we just don't know.Babcock doesnt use 4th line against top line. That would be crazy, it's usually kadri or straight up power v power. defensive face off, pk and protecting leads yeah that I could see. There is no way he would use this guy against other teams top line. 20 mins ice time for the 4th line not gonna happen.