Please.
Rangers would have lost the first series against the Flyers if we had Quick playing like he did against the Sharks.
-
Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
- Status
Please.
Rangers would have lost the first series against the Flyers if we had Quick playing like he did against the Sharks.
This game wasn't nearly as lopsided as EVERYONE is saying. We've carried the play against the best puck possession team in the game. You can't do a whole lot more than that.
Ghost of jas
Unsatisfied
Yeah, that sucked, but, I do not understand the mindset of part this fanbase to crap on this team when they lose. Yeah, it sucks being down 3-0. But, there are certain posters who only show up in down moments to spew crap. I do not understand that mindset.
haohmaru
boomshakalaka
Yeah, I think you said that back in early May, too.
I don't think they've got much of a chance but you'll have to excuse me if I don't take much that you say all that seriously. You gave up a long time ago.
Sucks even worse because the Rangers don't make it this far very often. Two SC Final appearances since 1979. I was hoping we'd make the most of this one. 
RiceCooker
"We Got Some Looks"
Can we get a PP specialist in the off season, you know someone who can hit the net on a point shot !!
Petey Pucks
Registered User
Raspewtin
Stay at home defenseman hater
- May 30, 2013
- 44,300
- 21,901
And still lost.
This is the playoffs. I'd have taken a win where we had 1 shot on goal.
In this series:
- Mats Zuccarrello has been our best player.
- Anton Stralman has been our most consistent - and arguably best - defender.
- And Hank has failed to come up with the big saves when it matters most (please, Hank defenders, don't jump all over me; there are a lot more problems than just him -- but it is incredibly disappointing to watch Quick making the saves he has made in this series while outside of the 3rd period in game 1, Hank has not seen nearly as many quality chances against where he actually came up with the save).
That is all you need to know about why this team is losing 3-0 in this series. If those things change, great, maybe they win a game and can crawl back into this series. If they don't, well, then this team deserves to lose.
- Mats Zuccarrello has been our best player.
- Anton Stralman has been our most consistent - and arguably best - defender.
- And Hank has failed to come up with the big saves when it matters most (please, Hank defenders, don't jump all over me; there are a lot more problems than just him -- but it is incredibly disappointing to watch Quick making the saves he has made in this series while outside of the 3rd period in game 1, Hank has not seen nearly as many quality chances against where he actually came up with the save).
That is all you need to know about why this team is losing 3-0 in this series. If those things change, great, maybe they win a game and can crawl back into this series. If they don't, well, then this team deserves to lose.
When O'Halloran messed up that call, and the linesman called a phantom icing, the NHL handed the Stanley Cup to their new darlings, the Los Angeles Kings.
Games 3 and 4 are mere formalities.
Hope Bettman gets hit with a beer bottle when he goes out on the ice on Wednesday.
6.25% chance to win the cup now if we give the Rangers a 50/50 chance to win every game. We can do it! 
Chimpradamus
Registered User
We heard you like the first five times tonight. We get it, you think Quick is the greatest thing since the invention of the wheel, because you have apparently not watched the rest of the rounds he performed in. If we had Quick in net, we would be golfing after the first round.
Sucks even worse because the Rangers don't make it this far very often. Two SC Final appearances since 1979. I was hoping we'd make the most of this one.
They will not be back to the finals anytime soon.
jerseyjinx94
I jinx players.
Fate.
Kings win Round 1 down 3 games to none.
They will lose the Finals being up 3 games to none.
It's fate.
Kings win Round 1 down 3 games to none.
They will lose the Finals being up 3 games to none.
It's fate.
0 for 6 on the PP. Quick made huge saves, but the team also missed several opportunities to create chances, and instead they made poor decisions with the puck and they paid for it. Kings got lucky breaks, but they out worked the Rangers when it counted.
BlueshirtBlitz
Foolish Samurai
If I could say what I wanted to say to half the people posting now (keep in mind, most of them were no-shows at the end of every other series) i'd be banned from this forum for life.
HatTrick Swayze
Just Be Nice
Said it in the GDT, gotta love the entire tri-state bandwagon getting a crash course on what it means to be a NYR fan.
Of course. But when you double up the opponent in shots and chances, you will usually like your chances.
Raspewtin
Stay at home defenseman hater
- May 30, 2013
- 44,300
- 21,901
Sorry the bolded is true.
Hank FINALLY gets his shot at the cup and he's..........good I guess. After all these years of him waiting I'm surprised this is how he plays.
I'm very shocked at him looking just slightly above average. Quick hasn't just been better, he's been convincingly better.
- Status
