frontsfan67
Registered User
- Dec 3, 2022
- 3,928
- 2,538
Please don't entertain this with paragraphs of reasoning. Most "lads" know it's an unnecessary, unrealistic pipe dream
![Salt :salt: 🧂](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@14.0.2/assets/72x72/1f9c2.png)
Only way it gets done is Hawery. Mews will be back next year.
Please don't entertain this with paragraphs of reasoning. Most "lads" know it's an unnecessary, unrealistic pipe dream
Exactly! We don’t need Mews. His defensive game is suspect, but if we have to give up Hawery, I’d rather it be for Jett Luchanko….
I hope London comes to the table and says here is Hawery, let’s do the trade…
Did we ever figure out the A card situation? Did we come to the conclusion London has used 29 cards and can make 1 more move for 1 player?
I could be wrong but wouldn't he have had to wear a cage if he was on a B card?I am reasonably sure you are at 29. The only possible 30th is Fimis. The typical process is to automatically put the rookies on Affiliate cards and let them play their nine games keeping the main card free. Sometimes, with key prospects that are clearly “on the team,” they will assign a full card but it really isn’t necessary because they get their full card once they play their 10th game.
I don’t see a reason why London would have assigned a full card to Fimis right away.
I could be wrong but wouldn't he have had to wear a cage if he was on a B card?
100%. If Hawery was movable and London was motivated to move him, Luchanko makes wayyyyy more sense.
It could be a different situation but I know a clue years ago when Kingston ran into injury issues they picked up a couple 18 year old OJHL D for a few games they both wore cages, but I don't know if that's because they were true call-ups as opposed to someone signed.He’s 17. I don’t think so since he is not an underage player. But, I don’t know that rule specifically.
Fimis is wearing a full cage.I could be wrong but wouldn't he have had to wear a cage if he was on a B card?
That's due to injury.Fimis is wearing a full cage.
That's due to injury.
Luchanko isn't going to Saginaw just saying they just sold buying Luchanko would very a waste of assets only benefit is if he comes back next year that's a BIG gambleWith luchenko possibly to saginaw and mccue to flint, we are probably done trading
I heard guelph is considering keeping himWith McCue off the board it's all eyes on Luchanko hopefully NTC are waved
Luchanko isn't going to Saginaw just saying
Yah it's called hardball Luchanko wants to win a championship Guelph wants Hawery so we shall seeI heard guelph is considering keeping him
I wish Luchanko would force their hand lolYah it's called hardball Luchanko wants to win a championship Guelph wants Hawery do we shall see
Looks like Rogers OHL Actionpak is being offered for free, must be a promo.
Channels 466, 467 carrying games tonight.
I also noticed that channel 430 regularly carries Brantford Bulldogs games.
Not trying to be mean but that's the first time I've ever seen "grit" and "Julien" in the same sentence.I like Londons D more, I like Londons forwards more: Barkey, O’Reilly, Cowan, Nicholl, Montgomery, Halttunnen, Nurmi, Sim, Julien better high end and more grit.
I pray it's real...would be a dumb move for Saginaw and it would put to rest the rumors to london.I really hope the rumour of Jett Luchanko to Saginaw is not a real thing and just speculation.
Yes this would be Winterton 2.0! I would love that dealIf the Knights do anything I hope they can get a discount deal with conditional picks for Musty.