ArielNederland
Registered User
- Jun 21, 2021
- 955
- 898
Pretty sure it’s 9 before it burns a year. Either way he might be getting a bit of a longer look. No issue. This is good for him and his development. The Knights have larger issues to work through either way.Not sure if this is remotely true, but would suck for us
View attachment 748554
Not sure if this is remotely true, but would suck for us
View attachment 748554
I think I'll just wait and see what happens.So this week we face SSM, NB and Guelph. All upper end teams. What are your thoughts on how we will do/expectations? I feel like if we can get 4 points I would consider that a successful week.
Right thats why it says unless he gets signed at Christmas by Chicago and assigned to London.....Frank Nazar would need to sign an NHL contract first and then he can be assigned by the Blackhawks. The NHL contract voids his eligibility to continue playing college hockey (scholarship), then he can be assigned to the OHL/AHL/NHL.
Oops lol! Must have misread that lol! Sorry!Right why it says unless he gets signed at Christmas by Chicago and assigned to London.....
Our back end is pretty strong this year. Probably one of the top in the league tbh.This is a first in a long time !
London is not playing in the Soo on the back-end of game three of a three game weekend,
The Greyhounds looks to have a powerful offence this year but are not as strong on the backend, if they stay close and whole them to three or less against, London should be able to take the two points
Let me repeat what was written in the post "The Greyhounds looks to have a powerful offence this year but are not as strong on the backend," Does a not as strong Backend as of a great offence mean weak defense or does it mean not as powerful as the offence??Our back end is pretty strong this year. Probably one of the top in the league tbh.
Should be a good game. Looking forward to it
The back end is a big part of the so far powerful offenseLet me repeat what was written in the post "The Greyhounds looks to have a powerful offence this year but are not as strong on the backend," Does a not as strong Backend as of a great offence mean weak defense or does it mean not as powerful as the offence??
Repeat it again for me. But don't copy and paste it. Type it again. Slowly.Let me repeat what was written in the post "The Greyhounds looks to have a powerful offence this year but are not as strong on the backend," Does a not as strong Backend as of a great offence mean weak defense or does it mean not as powerful as the offence??
No use of writing, isn'it, when someone can't read that is !! Cheers !Repeat it again for me. But don't copy and paste it. Type it again. Slowly.
The poster n post you responded to.....your reading too much into posts and attacking. Or is it that a SSM fan disagreed with your assessment of their team?Let me repeat what was written in the post "The Greyhounds looks to have a powerful offence this year but are not as strong on the backend," Does a not as strong Backend as of a great offence mean weak defense or does it mean not as powerful as the offence??
Ya, Right ! Sounds like someone is addressing the wrong poster - Cheers!The poster n post you responded to.....your reachng too much into posts and attacking. Or is it that a SSM fan disagreed with your assessment of their team?
Be better.
Yes, glad ya saw ya did that! TY.Ya, Right ! Sounds like someone is addressing the wrong poster - Cheers!
Haha I should know better. Last time I commented on something in the knights thread he literally told me it's not for me to be here. That was last year or the year before.The poster n post you responded to.....your reachng too much into posts and attacking. Or is it that a SSM fan disagreed with your assessment of their team?
Be better.
Don't know. But we can't have everyone on our team
Yikes what a low price. Would he have been an upgrade on any of our guys?
No disagreement. I am thinking our OAs are a better fit anyways, but that’s just such a low priceDon't know. But we can't have everyone on our team